![]() |
IMO
In my opinion I feel that the "yes" guys are voting out of fear. I feel they don't really think it's a good TA but are afraid of not getting a better one or of having to wait another 6-12 months. I have heard a bunch of "No" guys trying to persuade the "Yes" guys to vote no, but I haven't heard one "yes" guy try to persuade a "no" guy. A friend of mine said it best. Nads, you either got them or you don't.
TOGA! |
Policywonk, is it you? So nice to see you again, it's been such a long time.
|
Dang right I'm scared.
Scared we're going to waste another 2-3 years and never get back the time value of money. |
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 1981334)
Dang right I'm scared.
Scared we're going to waste another 2-3 years and never get back the time value of money. |
Originally Posted by JetJocF14
(Post 1981342)
Don't be such a wussy, it's not like your losing your job.
However. Huck does have an important point. My example (as everyone has a different number) one year delay=$32,650. Two year delay=$74,300. Don't even want to think about a third year. It is a balance of how much one believes it will cost to delay, how long it will be delayed, and how much one thinks a different TA might improve. Add how much you value money over possible QOL issues, or if you think QOL will improve or decline because of the TA. Easy call for some, tough call for others. |
Originally Posted by JetJocF14
(Post 1981342)
Don't be such a wussy, it's not like your losing your job.
|
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 1981385)
Says the triple captain......
He has less to lose? |
Originally Posted by GiggityGoo
(Post 1981293)
In my opinion I feel that the "yes" guys are voting out of fear. I feel they don't really think it's a good TA but are afraid of not getting a better one or of having to wait another 6-12 months.
TOGA! I find it interesting that some proponents of rejecting this TA have thrown out anything from 4 months to 1 year to achieve yet another TA. Sure it's anyones best guess, but the idea that this TA that took more than 4 years to achieve will be tossed to the trash bin and we will establish a new NC, possibly new committee's, and perhaps even a partial or full replacement of the MEC. THEN, survey, poll, and re-negotiate another complete TA within one year is mind boggling. Let's just say the deal will take probably more time than anyone of us will find reasonable. Unless of course you FEAR to discuss how long it may really take? So I think it may feel good to say all the YES voters are reacting to fear, but after speaking to many, it's an educated opinion based on the facts, risk assessment, and a high level of knowledge of failed TA's in previous airline labor deals. I have yet to find a pilot quivering in fear about the outcome. |
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 1981334)
Dang right I'm scared.
Scared we're going to waste another 2-3 years and never get back the time value of money. |
Sometimes it isn't just about the money. If it takes 2 years to get another TA so be it. Better than sacrificing QOL for the next 8 years while simultaneously showing the company we have no unity, no backbone and are willing to assist in throwing our profession under the bus
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands