New Leadership
10-21-2015, 08:29 AM
#21
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
The real reason they should step down is they voted unanimously to end negotiations then whipsawed and immediately began viciously attacking the TA before anything was out about it .........no print copies, no roadshows nada.............it seems to me this duplicitous tactic was planned all along..........JMHO
10-21-2015, 08:52 AM
#22
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by MaxKts
Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
The real reason they should step down is they voted unanimously to end negotiations then whipsawed and immediately began viciously attacking the TA before anything was out about it .........no print copies, no roadshows nada.............it seems to me this duplicitous tactic was planned all along..........JMHO
Originally Posted by TonyC
Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
... why would the MEC vote unanimously to conclude negotiations and ...
.
10-21-2015, 02:01 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Originally Posted by skeebo2
Now that the TA is passed. Will the union leaders (DON, ANITA, etc) who vehemently railed against the contract. Please have the decency to step down.
Go back to the line where you belong. You don't represent most of us.
Please try to maintain some self respect.
This applies to all the "I TOLD you so" posts to follow= Waste of time
Go back to the line where you belong. You don't represent most of us.
Please try to maintain some self respect.
This applies to all the "I TOLD you so" posts to follow= Waste of time
Yet, only 54% of the eligible pilots they represent, voted for the TA.
If only 270 of the "yes" voters had voted "No"...The TA would have failed.
I agree. Our MEC is NOT representative of us.
Just sayin'
10-21-2015, 07:27 PM
#24
Beaches and Sand
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
If she leads your block then you may have something to say.... if not, then bloviate elsewhere. She definitely OVERWHELMINGLY represents a majority of her block. Fortunately, that is my block. Go away.
10-21-2015, 08:04 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by kc10/c130
If she leads your block then you may have something to say.... if not, then bloviate elsewhere. She definitely OVERWHELMINGLY represents a majority of her block. Fortunately, that is my block. Go away.
10-21-2015, 08:48 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
The real reason they should step down is they voted unanimously to end negotiations then whipsawed and immediately began viciously attacking the TA before anything was out about it .........no print copies, no roadshows nada.............it seems to me this duplicitous tactic was planned all along..........JMHO
The 9-5 vote was to end negotiations and send the TA back for final language. Nine voted YES; end negotiations and create a TA. Five voted NO; keep negotiating.
4 of those 5 then voted not to send the resultant TA to the membership for ratification and they put out information on why they thought the TA wasn't good enough.
There was already an unsuccessful attempt to recall the Block 11 rep and now someone is suggesting a recall of another block rep.
The CRM takeaway is that anyone that says "I'm uncomfortable with that" needs to be fired. Real nice.
10-21-2015, 09:52 PM
#27
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Just to be precise, it is a LEC decision not a block decision.
Those three alone are also the LEC, or Local Executive Council.
The information on our website is not correct when it says, "You are in LEC ____". Unless you're a Block Rep, you aren't. You're in LC ___.
Originally Posted by MX727
The 9-5 vote was to end negotiations and send the TA back for final language. Nine voted YES; end negotiations and create a TA. Five voted NO; keep negotiating.
4 of those 5 then voted not to send the resultant TA to the membership for ratification and they put out information on why they thought the TA wasn't good enough.
So, in total, 6 of the 14 cast at least one "No" vote.
.
10-21-2015, 10:27 PM
#28
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by skeebo2
Now that the TA is passed. Will the union leaders (DON, ANITA, etc) who vehemently railed against the contract. Please have the decency to step down.
Go back to the line where you belong. You don't represent most of us.
Please try to maintain some self respect.
This applies to all the "I TOLD you so" posts to follow= Waste of time
Go back to the line where you belong. You don't represent most of us.
Please try to maintain some self respect.
This applies to all the "I TOLD you so" posts to follow= Waste of time
10-22-2015, 09:22 AM
#29
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
“He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot.”
― Groucho Marx
I have nothing but respect for you -- and not much of that.”
-GM
Next time I see you, remind me not to talk to you.”
-Groucho Marx
Did anybody tell you that you're a few french fries short of a Happy Meal?”
― Susan Elizabeth Phillips,
“Roses are red, violets are blue, I have five fingers, the middle one is for you.”
― Gena Showalter,
"Raging idiot" is that the best you can do?
― Groucho Marx
I have nothing but respect for you -- and not much of that.”
-GM
Next time I see you, remind me not to talk to you.”
-Groucho Marx
Did anybody tell you that you're a few french fries short of a Happy Meal?”
― Susan Elizabeth Phillips,
“Roses are red, violets are blue, I have five fingers, the middle one is for you.”
― Gena Showalter,
"Raging idiot" is that the best you can do?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ArcticDog
Major
8
12-26-2008 08:08 AM
