CRS - Complete Joke
05-02-2016, 01:41 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Another idiot that thinks voting no would have gotten him his personal provision into the next contract. This wasn't on the table. I wish it were but it wasn't.
05-02-2016, 02:40 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by golfandfly
Quit being a tool. You whine more than anyone else on this forum and now you call someone an idiot for wanting to make changes to the contract..
05-02-2016, 03:54 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 181
Really?
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
We have the no voters simpering because they didn't get their way six months later and I am whining. You don't know the definition of the word.
05-02-2016, 04:21 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Originally Posted by kwri10s
Not correct. The only "problem" with real time trading, is that according to the NC there will not be a time period where trips are sitting in open time waiting to be assigned.
If OTP was the big show stopper, there were definitely ways to make both options possible. Assuming the guy with OTP actually wants trips, then he puts in a request for trips (even dictates some specific criteria for what he might want), just like any general M/U request. But, obviously his request gets priority. The idea that he's going to wait around until something actually shows in OT to act is ridiculous. He either wants a trip or he doesn't. He puts in when and what he wants and he's done.
Now (assuming we had RTTT) when something pops into OT that meets his or anyone else's OTP request, they automatically get it based on time stamp of their request? seniority? I don't know? Whatever is in the rules.
If the trip doesn't meet any existing OTP requests in the system, then it's a standard food fight for that and any other trip in OT except in real time - not "when I get around to it" CRS time.
How hard would that have been?
05-02-2016, 04:32 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Originally Posted by Dakota
NEVER going to happen. 57% of the guys probably think it's good the way it is. Just ask Albie, FDXLAG and ROCK. We have an industry leading contract.
05-04-2016, 01:27 PM
#27
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Another idiot that thinks voting no would have gotten him his personal provision into the next contract. This wasn't on the table. I wish it were but it wasn't.
05-04-2016, 03:18 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by Goulet69
That is very progressive of you FDXLAG. So anyone who has a different opinion of our contract than you is an idiot. Got it.
If you think voting no would have gotten us real time trip trading you meet the self-defeating definition threshold. It was not on the table.
05-04-2016, 03:48 PM
#30
"blue collar thug"!
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
An idiot, dolt, dullard or (archaically) mome is a person perceived to be lacking intelligence, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way.
If you think voting no would have gotten us real time trip trading you meet the self-defeating definition threshold. It was not on the table.
If you think voting no would have gotten us real time trip trading you meet the self-defeating definition threshold. It was not on the table.
With each subsequent post, you prove what a true piece of work you are.
And come on, let me have it!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
