Search

Notices

New uniform policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2016 | 08:03 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sprucie
http://m.ebay.com/itm/181806963779?_mwBanner=1

This should help nail down the parts cost if they are not installed in the 757s. I do not know if these are HEPA or not and I have have no proof one way or the other if they are currently in use.
We could hold a couple of barbecues at Memphis and cover the cost of those. Would sure like to know who exactly ordered the removal and why. Anyone get a bonus for the cost savings?
Reply
Old 06-03-2016 | 11:51 AM
  #62  
HIFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: 777 Captain in Training
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
I also am sorry to hear you've had to suffer through that. It really bothers me how many of our pilots seem to have to deal with these sort of problems, as it seems that the statistics are far higher than the norm. Of course, neither the union nor the company keeps track. Reading what we're exposed to makes me wonder if that's the reason why. I would really like the hear the reason for removing the HEPA filters also.
The real question is did they get approval from the aircraft manufacturer in a EA or just remove them. I can't see Airbus or Boeing approving a EA for that and if no EA how can FedEx just decide to remove them.
Reply
Old 06-03-2016 | 12:19 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR
The real question is did they get approval from the aircraft manufacturer in a EA or just remove them. I can't see Airbus or Boeing approving a EA for that and if no EA how can FedEx just decide to remove them.
I've heard rumors the filters were part of the MD-10 supplemental type certificate. If true, that might be a major fine and self-disclosure for operating a huge, huge number of unairworthy flights?
Reply
Old 06-03-2016 | 10:46 PM
  #64  
Adlerdriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 37
From: 767 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BlackKnight
While I'm certainly not arguing with you, I am glad to see them finally issue reflective vests.
They want us to wear a vest - fine. Was the best solution really to buy 4200+ vests and ship each one individually to all of us?

How about just put a couple of them on each jet, change the FOM to require wearing them for walk-arounds and call it good.
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 02:12 AM
  #65  
TheBaron Deux's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Counting down the bid packs
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
They want us to wear a vest - fine. Was the best solution really to buy 4200+ vests and ship each one individually to all of us?

How about just put a couple of them on each jet, change the FOM to require wearing them for walk-arounds and call it good.
When has logic ever been involved in company decisions? Delay starting the APU for another minute (x 10 years) and we'll have it all paid for.
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 03:59 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
They want us to wear a vest - fine. Was the best solution really to buy 4200+ vests and ship each one individually to all of us?

How about just put a couple of them on each jet, change the FOM to require wearing them for walk-arounds and call it good.


Valid, and agreed. Actually, I've had that discussion several times as a good way to go about it. Is it India where it's required, or Japan (been a while since I was on the 777)? The ramp guys just gave one to you at the jet...
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 10:58 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Default

CGN and FRA for sure, maybe others.
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 12:38 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: MD11 Captain
Default

Back to original thread topic - write an Insite report about your beefs with the policy change. Maybe (ha!) they'll listen. I did and it felt good to vent, which is all it accomplished. Why not at least give us a month or so to "transition" to this policy vs "fire, ready, aim"??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 03:11 PM
  #69  
fr8av8r's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 1
From: Chemtrailing since 1981
Default

Originally Posted by hoya saxa
"... Why not at least give us a month or so to "transition" to this policy vs "fire, ready, aim"??"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe "they" get a bigger bonus for "immediate results".
Reply
Old 06-04-2016 | 05:24 PM
  #70  
MaxKts's Avatar
Part Time Employee
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Default

Originally Posted by hoya saxa
....Why not at least give us a month or so to "transition" to this policy vs "fire, ready, aim"??
Because everyone would run to their "favorite" uniform shop and spend their allowance before being forced to go to M&H! 😉
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SayAgain
SkyWest
52
01-21-2016 11:07 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
jungle
Money Talk
10
01-27-2009 12:55 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices