Type Rating Opinions
#1
Thread Starter
New Hire
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Hi guys, wanted to see if I can get some opinions from professionals here.
I am working on getting FAA ATPL based on ICAO ATPL. I haven't flown professionally since 2001 but have over 5000 total hours (960 jet, 1000 MEL). Oh, and I'm a US citizen.
My plan is to take ATPL practical concurrently with a type rating (for example 737NG). Airline or business aviation will work.
I have about $10K I can spend on the rating and am looking for opinions on which type ratings are more in demand in today's market.
I am working on getting FAA ATPL based on ICAO ATPL. I haven't flown professionally since 2001 but have over 5000 total hours (960 jet, 1000 MEL). Oh, and I'm a US citizen.
My plan is to take ATPL practical concurrently with a type rating (for example 737NG). Airline or business aviation will work.
I have about $10K I can spend on the rating and am looking for opinions on which type ratings are more in demand in today's market.
#4
For 10 K I think you're limited to the 737 or CE500. When you start talking Hawker or other business jets, there are only a couple places to go and they know it. Same thing for the bus and 75/76.
#6
#8
Thread Starter
New Hire
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
thanks but I was really hoping to hear some specific opinions/reasoning on the subj. Of course I have reasons to go ahead and do a type rating instead of just going to an instructor to practice for ATP practical. Either way I'll have to take a practical exam, it seems make sense to go to one of the type rating schools to do that.
So which type rating is more valuable? Are there more jobs on B-737, B-757 or Airbus? Something along those lines
So which type rating is more valuable? Are there more jobs on B-737, B-757 or Airbus? Something along those lines
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




