Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

RVSM Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2010 | 04:34 AM
  #11  
ce650's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: EVIL PRIVATE JET
Default

Sorry guys I WAS just kidding. Guess I need to use those little smiley faces.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 05:52 AM
  #12  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

Originally Posted by ce650
Sorry guys I WAS just kidding. Guess I need to use those little smiley faces.
All is forgiven then!

(Sorry for my rant- I HAVE encountered several folks with that attitude... including one that ended up having a loss of separation due to crappy equipment).
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 06:10 AM
  #13  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
when you check in with Center say "negative RVSM" and getting up to altitude shouldn't be an issue...although there very well may be a delay for the climb (which would allow you to get to VMo and have plenty of energy for an aggressive climb rate).
.

I don't recommend zoom climbs in RVSM with TCAS equipped aircraft everywhere. Might get somebody hurt, or violated, or worse.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 06:36 AM
  #14  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 118
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
I don't recommend zoom climbs in RVSM with TCAS equipped aircraft everywhere. Might get somebody hurt, or violated, or worse.
If he's at FL280 and the controller is trying to climb him through RVSM airspace, odds are good that the controller will want to get him up to FL430 as soon as possible...and I'm not sure a zoom climb works too well when you're looking to go up 15,000ft anyway.

In a CJ3, which climbs pretty well at altitude anyway, beginning a climb at FL280 and VMo should allow a sustained climb of at least 1500fpm (probably more) all the way to FL430.

When traffic is an issue for climbing, I like to tell ATC what climb rates we're capable of so that they can plan their separation accordingly - no surprises for anyone and once ATC knows what we can do it usually allows us to get a climb clearance.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 09:22 AM
  #15  
dbtownley's Avatar
Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: TC-12B (SELRES)
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
UAL -

I **think** the Super Hornet was just recently certified though it doesn't have any of the items that you listed. The military was the cause of the exclusion in the first place - or so I was told at the Hornet Safety Systems Working Group in 2007. They started working on getting the strike/fighter community back into the block.

Iwaddle - Though I have not filed into RVSM lately - I have flown in it with the ATC's permission and like advised - I was sure to let them know that I was not properly equipped.

USMCFLYR
The Military gets a a free pass. They are covered under one of the 5 exceptions to the rule. Another is when doing flight test for first time RVSM approval.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 10:58 AM
  #16  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default Not Quite Free..

Originally Posted by dbtownley
The Military gets a free pass. They are covered under one of the 5 exceptions to the rule. Another is when doing flight test for first time RVSM approval.
We're not quite 'free:' we have to state negative-RVSM, and it is subject to controller approval/workload. That makes us the same as any other non-RVSM aircraft.

I try to show it to my students when we are cross-country, so they can learn the terminology, and see how the aircraft handles in the 30s (it's different; gets a little twitchy above FL320). I can get approval usually only once every 2-3 months.

Now, if it were for operational necessity (chasing somebody to stop an attack), all bets are off.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 11:51 AM
  #17  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

The military get's a pass with regards to needing to have prior approval through LOA. Officially, civilian non-RVSM aircraft must precoordinate operations in RVSM airspace prior to filing a flight plan or requesting access (including climbing above RVSM), however there is a lot of lee way given.

Military aircraft in RVSM airspace that don't have appropriate RVSM certified aircraft are subject to normal non-RVSM separation standards (2000' vertical).
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default New To Me

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
The military gets a pass with regards to needing to have prior approval through LOA. Officially, civilian non-RVSM aircraft must precoordinate operations in RVSM airspace prior to filing a flight plan or requesting access (including climbing above RVSM), however there is a lot of lee way given....
Josh:

I didn't know that distinction....thanks. I learned something today.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 02:13 PM
  #19  
lwaddle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: DH8D FO
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
The military get's a pass with regards to needing to have prior approval through LOA. Officially, civilian non-RVSM aircraft must precoordinate operations in RVSM airspace prior to filing a flight plan or requesting access (including climbing above RVSM), however there is a lot of lee way given.

Military aircraft in RVSM airspace that don't have appropriate RVSM certified aircraft are subject to normal non-RVSM separation standards (2000' vertical).
I can't find anything in the regulations that states you must precoordinate operations in RVSM prior to filing. In fact according to the AIM is specifically states: "file-and-fly" then request your transition.

It seems that you military guys have to deal with this all the time so I'm sure you know better than me. My plan is to file for FL430 and put "NEGATIVE RVSM" in the remarks. Once I'm with center I'll request FL430 Negative RVSM. I'll post tomorrow afternoon after I land to report how everything goes.

Here's what the AIM says:

4-6-11. Non-RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off

a. File-and-Fly. Operators of Non-RVSM aircraft climbing to and descending from RVSM flight levels should just file a flight plan.

b. Non-RVSM aircraft climbing to and descending from flight levels above RVSM airspace will be handled on a workload permitting basis. The vertical separation standard applied in RVSM airspace between non-RVSM aircraft and all other aircraft shall be 2,000 feet.

c. Non-RVSM aircraft climbing to/descending from RVSM airspace can only be considered for accommodation provided:

1. Aircraft is capable of a continuous climb/descent and does not need to level off at an intermediate altitude for any operational considerations and

2. Aircraft is capable of climb/descent at the normal rate for the aircraft.

d. Required Pilot Calls. The pilot of non-RVSM aircraft will inform the controller of the lack of RVSM approval in accordance with the direction provided in paragraph 4-6-8, Pilot/Controller Phraseology.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
dcutting9
Regional
17
02-09-2009 05:46 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices