Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

What will punishment be?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2011 | 11:52 AM
  #1  
f16jetmech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default What will punishment be?

So an instructor coworker of mine made a big mistake and solo'd a student WITHOUT endorsing the medical. Long story but the student got a medical in scotland, had it on the way in the mail or something like that, but come to find out the medical is NOT a student medical. Its a first class without the student portion, so nowhere to put the instructor endorsement for solo flight. So the student now has to go get a NEW medical. So the medical date will be POST solo flight, obviously not good. My opinion is the instructor needs to fess up to the FAA ASAP and say hey i screwed up what do i need to do and go from there. Any other words of advise? What will punishment be do you think? Also, this is a good 141 school that tries to do things right... think there will be any punishment from FAA to the school?

Please, i say again PLEASE, refrain from any flaming comments towards the instructor. Good guy and a good instructor with an honest mistake. Constructive posting only please
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:15 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: FO 757/767
Default

I would have the flight school fess up to the FAA and show they have a policy in place to prevent this from happening in the future. As for the CFI, the best learning experience for anyone is mistakes. I'm sure he has beaten himself up enough over this. Learn and move on. Maybe put a letter in his file to be removed at a predetermined date, if there are no other incidences. This would probably further satisfy the FAA. The whole situation in the grand scheme of things is relatively minor.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:21 PM
  #3  
fatmike69's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: EMB120 CA
Default

I would in NO WAY fess up to the FAA. If you have an altitude/course deviation during your career, would you call the FAA immediately to "fess up"? One is just inviting enforcement actions here. To be honest with you, there is an extremely low chance of this ever being noticed. Have him file the NASA form for protection, and then leave it at that. Stay away from the FAA at all times whenever possible, that's my advice. If he feels absoloutely compelled to self-disclose to the FAA, be sure to consult an aviation attorney first.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:29 PM
  #4  
f16jetmech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

I would in NO WAY fess up to the FAA. If you have an altitude/course deviation during your career, would you call the FAA immediately to "fess up"? One is just inviting enforcement actions here. To be honest with you, there is an extremely low chance of this ever being noticed. Have him file the NASA form for protection, and then leave it at that. Stay away from the FAA at all times whenever possible, that's my advice. If he feels absoloutely compelled to self-disclose to the FAA, be sure to consult an aviation attorney first.
Don't know if that's the best policy especially knowing WHEN we get inspected (not if), it will be found.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

The school should disenroll the student from 141 and complete him 61. Most 141 programs require the medical/student pilot certificate before the student begins the flight training phase.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by fatmike69
I would in NO WAY fess up to the FAA. If you have an altitude/course deviation during your career, would you call the FAA immediately to "fess up"? One is just inviting enforcement actions here. To be honest with you, there is an extremely low chance of this ever being noticed. Have him file the NASA form for protection, and then leave it at that. Stay away from the FAA at all times whenever possible, that's my advice. If he feels absoloutely compelled to self-disclose to the FAA, be sure to consult an aviation attorney first.
I completely agree. This is not the first that person has ever violated a FAR, nor will it be the last. Same goes for any pilot. If you accidentally speed on the way home, do you call the cops? If you accidentally walk out of a restaurant without paying do you call the cops on yourself? No, you go back, apologize and pay. If you get off altitude by over 300 feet and tgen immediately correct, do you turn yourself in to the FSDO? I know a pilot that got off by over 300 feet, corrected, but told on themselves to ATC. Wrong move. I could go on..but if you like violations and kicking a hornets nest, go ahead. It sorta reminds me of the drunk captain interview question.....are you gonna throw people under the bus and get violatuons started, or can you use your head and make the safe choice that protects others careers? This is freaky stuff man. I would not want to fly with someone who goes to the feds right away. That is not to say don't use CRM, speak up for safety, and have postflight debriefs, etc. But now we are talking about unleashing the legal hounds here! Be thinking damn hard before getting the law involved. I say this for everyone's good.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 12:37 PM
  #7  
fatmike69's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: EMB120 CA
Default

Originally Posted by f16jetmech
Don't know if that's the best policy especially knowing WHEN we get inspected (not if), it will be found.
That's what the NASA form is for. You mentioned that this is a 141 flight school, do you have an in-house ASAP program? If so, even better, use it! That's a big reason why we have these tools available to us (NASA/ASAP). It will pretty much guaruntee a non-punitive result if an investigation is ever conducted (of course this comes with limitations, but as a CFI he should know what these are). As a captain at a 121 carrier, I can't tell you how many times I've seen "paperwork errors" that could probably warrant FAA action, that are effectively handled in-house. Honestly this is a pretty minor one.

I understand your viewpoint, but you really are taking your chances calling an enforcement agency to confess a violation. You might get an understanding fed that will recommend no action or some simple remedial training, or you might get one that recommends certificate action or fines. This is just my .2.....

Last edited by fatmike69; 07-15-2011 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 01:34 PM
  #8  
f16jetmech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

Again I want to make this clear that this is a 141 school that is inspected regularly by the Dallas FSDO. This is an endorsement that is put on final paperwork of a checkride. It's not like you put 2.0 hood when it should have been 1.5. This is a paperwork issue that can't be reversed. Are you suggesting forging his logbook? A federal document? I'm a bit confused on just brushing it aside.

Also an update, the school has decided that they will come forward if he doesn't. It could be their 141 ticket when the Feds find out
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 01:37 PM
  #9  
f16jetmech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

Originally Posted by f16jetmech
Don't know if that's the best policy especially knowing WHEN we get inspected (not if), it will be found.
That's what the NASA form is for. You mentioned that this is a 141 flight school, do you have an in-house ASAP program? If so, even better, use it! That's a big reason why we have these tools available to us (NASA/ASAP). It will pretty much guaruntee a non-punitive result if an investigation is ever conducted (of course this comes with limitations, but as a CFI he should know what these are). As a captain at a 121 carrier, I can't tell you how many times I've seen "paperwork errors" that could probably warrant FAA action, that are effectively handled in-house. Honestly this is a pretty minor one.

I understand your viewpoint, but you really are taking your chances calling an enforcement agency to confess a violation. You might get an understanding fed that will recommend no action or some simple remedial training, or you might get one that recommends certificate action or fines. This is just my .2.....
Unless you go back into his logbook and change the date that he solo'd, the solo date and medical date won't match up. How do you suggest to fix it in house? (no sarcasm, honestly asking)
Reply
Old 07-15-2011 | 01:47 PM
  #10  
fatmike69's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: EMB120 CA
Default

Originally Posted by f16jetmech
Again I want to make this clear that this is a 141 school that is inspected regularly by the Dallas FSDO. This is an endorsement that is put on final paperwork of a checkride. It's not like you put 2.0 hood when it should have been 1.5. This is a paperwork issue that can't be reversed. Are you suggesting forging his logbook? A federal document? I'm a bit confused on just brushing it aside.

Also an update, the school has decided that they will come forward if he doesn't. It could be their 141 ticket when the Feds find out
Of course I'm not suggesting forging a logbook, that would completely invalidate the entire NASA/ASAP immunity protection. By handling it "in-house" I meant that not everything needs to be reported to the Feds, including the flight school needing to report it. But now if the 141 school says that they are going to self disclose if he doesn't, that is a big time game changer. I still stand by original advice though, only fill out the NASA/ASAP form and leave it at that. The FAA will view that as "compliance" and "self-disclosure". Let the 141 school disclose it to the FAA. They have many more resources (legal departement, etc.) and will know how to disclose it to the FAA in the least incriminating way as possible. It's all about CYA and liability at this point, and trust me, your school has a major vested interest in this.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TPROP4ever
Hangar Talk
40
11-18-2009 11:23 PM
Squawk_5543
Hangar Talk
5
12-15-2007 01:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices