IFR Approach PDF
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Posts: 1,317
IFR Approach PDF
While looking for an answer as to what the difference is between the thick and thin holding patterns, I came across this PDF. It explains how to set up for an approach, differences between Jepp and NOS charts, even how to brief the approach plates. I hope this will help someone out.
http://www.1worldaero.com/HOW%20TO%2...20APPROACH.pdf
http://www.1worldaero.com/HOW%20TO%2...20APPROACH.pdf
#2
This is some really good stuff jsfBoat - thanks for sharing!
I see that the Jepp approach briefed the highest obstacle.
“Highest Obstacle is at 2000 on the left side near Ricke”
Is this information standard on all Jepp approaches?
If the approach is an RNAV, does it list the controlling obstacle for the LNAV, LNAV/VNAV, and LPV approaches? What about the Missed Approach controller or the circling controllers?
I haven't looked at Jepp charts in over 20 years so I'm obviously not up to date. I knew that they derived their information from the NOS and presented it in a different fashion (though NOS has evolved to be more similar than in the past).
USMCFLYR
I see that the Jepp approach briefed the highest obstacle.
“Highest Obstacle is at 2000 on the left side near Ricke”
Is this information standard on all Jepp approaches?
If the approach is an RNAV, does it list the controlling obstacle for the LNAV, LNAV/VNAV, and LPV approaches? What about the Missed Approach controller or the circling controllers?
I haven't looked at Jepp charts in over 20 years so I'm obviously not up to date. I knew that they derived their information from the NOS and presented it in a different fashion (though NOS has evolved to be more similar than in the past).
USMCFLYR
#3
Since we are kind of on the subject, a student asked me an IAP question the other day and I didn't have an answer.
Why is it that some of the IAF "T" procedures on RNAV appchs show an arrow, while some are completely connected as one solid line?
Why is it that some of the IAF "T" procedures on RNAV appchs show an arrow, while some are completely connected as one solid line?
#4
USMCFLYR
#5
USMCFLYR...check these three approaches out.
1st: College Station (KCLL) RNAV 10
IAFs (HAXUN or GOVEY) have arrows that don't connect to the (IF) ICESO.
2nd: Randolph (KRND) RNAV 14R
IAF (HADKI) has a solid bold line (w/ an arrow on it) that connects to the (IF) WAXEL.
3rd: San Antonio (KSAT) RNAV (GPS) 03
IAFs (BEBNE or ANUBE) have arrows that connect to (IF) HARDD.
All of KCLL's RNAV approaches have short arrows that do not connect to the (IF). Does it have something to do with "Radar Required" at KCLL?
KCLL: http://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/1112/00928R10.PDF
KRND: http://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/1112/00341R14R.PDF
KSAT: http://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/1112/00369RY3.PDF
#6
Only 1 of those utilizes a TAA (the 3rd, which also goes down to Cat 1 Precision Minimums), which is why I'd expect to see the solid lines there. The TAA is supposed to be a more standardized GPS approach procedure that when combined with WAAS has the capability for Cat 1 mins. Otherwise, I'd expect it's just a scale issue with multiple IAFs? Interested to see what anyone else has to say. I know I can drump up multiple examples of the same (approaches with multiple IAFs that are not connected with a solid line).
Point is, that while there are two of those above approaches with a "T", only one of those two is a TAA "T". The non-TAA one is most likely an older approach, possibly upgraded with LPV minimums recently.
Point is, that while there are two of those above approaches with a "T", only one of those two is a TAA "T". The non-TAA one is most likely an older approach, possibly upgraded with LPV minimums recently.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 451
While looking for an answer as to what the difference is between the thick and thin holding patterns, I came across this PDF. It explains how to set up for an approach, differences between Jepp and NOS charts, even how to brief the approach plates. I hope this will help someone out.
http://www.1worldaero.com/HOW%20TO%2...20APPROACH.pdf
http://www.1worldaero.com/HOW%20TO%2...20APPROACH.pdf
I wonder if you got into a membership area or something and they saw this and closed the link.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 490
#10
This is a cool stuff, thanks.
I also like the IFR app where you can have ADF + RMI, VOR + ILS,
HSI, IFR sim and holding pattern instructor.
Pilot Trainer IFR Pack app for iPhone, iPad | FlyGo-Aviation Ltd.
I also like the IFR app where you can have ADF + RMI, VOR + ILS,
HSI, IFR sim and holding pattern instructor.
Pilot Trainer IFR Pack app for iPhone, iPad | FlyGo-Aviation Ltd.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post