Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Power-on stalls

Old 06-17-2012, 06:33 PM
  #11  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

any stall recovery is summed up as "fly the airplane". If folks remembered that everything comes down to "fly the airplane" we might have less accidents aka Colgan, etc.
satpak77 is offline  
Old 06-18-2012, 03:33 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Sometimes CFIs pick up weird ideas and pass them on. They tend to be based on either "it's what I learned" or on a misunderstanding of something else.

The only power-on stall situation I can think of that would involve reducing power is if the stall wasn't recovered properly and the airplane entered a spin. Maybe somewhere along the way, some CFI added 2+2 together and came up with 7?
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 06-18-2012, 04:02 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

I've never heard of that and it sounds improper to me... reducing power to recover from a power-on stall that is.

Only time I reduce the throttles on any kind of recovery is Vmc demos and spins.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 06-18-2012, 07:31 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I can't agree with the above posts any more. I figured the procedure was wrong after looking over the Airplane Flying Handbook, thus the reason for this post and to confirm my suspicion. Have flown with several CFI's and DPEs without any opposition. Thanks everyone.
ahh, couple questions.

1) Does this mean you are going to continue to reduce the power to idle on power on stalls even though an AC from the FAA says to do the opposite?

2) Have you ever asked these several CFIs and DPEs WHY they are doing this? What exactly is the reason to pull the power out, because I can't think of one other than a spin situation.

It is totally possible especially in a small FBO type school that all the instructors, and even the local DPEs all learned what they know from the same person(or few persons). Just because a few people told you "for sure" that this is the correct procedure doesn't always make it true.

When I was a CFI the AFH, PHAC, and IFH were ALWAYS our go-to for settling arguments either among ourselves over beers, or if a student just didn't believe what you were telling them. Also all my lessons were generally structured around what was in those books with some input from other sources if they weren't in depth enough( aerodynamics for naval aviators, etc...)
pagey is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:02 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 182
Default

Reduce angle of attack... power applied simultaneously --as long as the airplane can take it & the pilot can maintain coordination-- Most trainers have no problem with this. Some higher performance airplanes will run out of rudder if you just go to full power at a sufficiently high angle of attack (p-factor).
M20EPilot is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:24 PM
  #16  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

I think you guys are misinterpreting...

I think he agrees wholeheartedly with everybody's post.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:58 PM
  #17  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

I just picked up on that too, and I'd read his response at least ten times with a large degree of incredulity. About the 12th time I finally got that maybe he was saying something different that what I thought. Surprised he hasn't jumped in to clarify.
bcrosier is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:34 PM
  #18  
Don't need that HUD!
 
trent890's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B777/B787 - Flight Test
Posts: 317
Default

Not to put words in the OP's mouth, but perhaps...

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I can't agree with the above posts any more.
should have been written as:

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I couldn't agree more with the above posts.
trent890 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 01:29 PM
  #19  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Student
Posts: 20
Default

Agreed, thank you for clarifying.

Originally Posted by trent890 View Post
Not to put words in the OP's mouth, but perhaps...



should have been written as:

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I couldn't agree more with the above posts.
left seat is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 03:13 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 165
Default

Not to put words in the OP's mouth, but perhaps...

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I can't agree with the above posts any more.
should have been written as:

Originally Posted by left seat View Post
I couldn't agree more with the above posts.
Haha, I love engrish
sinkrate3278 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
14
05-18-2012 05:28 AM
toney
Flight Schools and Training
31
03-04-2010 06:48 AM
homer j
Major
0
06-17-2008 03:35 PM
FalconPilot
Corporate
4
11-28-2007 03:12 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-14-2005 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices