Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Best Tach time v Hobbs time ratio >

Best Tach time v Hobbs time ratio

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Best Tach time v Hobbs time ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:12 AM
  #21  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,603
Default

Originally Posted by DALFA View Post
Now you're just being ridiculous. Go spread your garbage on another thread please.
You've been given correct advice, obviously it's not what you want to hear....so he has a point in saying just pencil whip your hours. In reality you're not going into this with the right attitude all you want is some cheap hours so really "dude" just write it into your log book. There is plenty of places on the .net to find a simple Cessna POH do some research rather than just asking for quick answers, it'll better help you when you need to find answers as you progress through the more complex ratings if you so choose to pursue aviation as a career.
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 03:52 AM
  #22  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

I have to agree with JohnBurke!

Yes the "hours" matter, but people lose focus on the experience you need to gain during those hours.

I do see both sides however, so there's not any finger pointing here.

So my basic breakdown is;

1: lowest avg RPM setting per hour, so that could be slow taxi/time to runway(although least productive in experience gained)

2: pattern with full stop taxi back......some good experience hindered by taxi back

3: XC at L/D Max: slow, but most efficient cruise setting. Add a challenge of identifying checkpoints and off course deviations, amending your destination enroute, etc....

4: using #3 to get somewhere new, then practicing pattern there. Go to an airport you heard was a challenge, take the trip and make it a destination.

5: grab 2-3 friends and share the cost to go somewhere fun. They don't need to be pilot friends, take family, etc... Preferably you need to be comfortable with where you are going, and I highly recommend early in the morning or late afternoon if you have new flyers for less connective turbulence. This way you can run normal cruise settings also.

Take any of these scenarios, change your Wx mins, night flying, crosswinds, whatever you want to advance your skills. That is all I ask is you try to make the most out of each hour you are in the air
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 05:38 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

I would...but like I said..."i'm in the process of joining". So I don't have access to the airplane just yet.

Why so much hostility? Jeez...one would think I was asking for the best way to pencil whip a logbook. I'm just trying to stretch my dollar, out of all people you guys should know how expensive it is to rent a plane and now you can't even get a Part 121 job until you have at least 1,500 hours.
You're essentially asking us to do a performance problem for you to determine the best altitude and power setting for longest time aloft.

That is exactly the kind if experience you get by being PIC of your aircraft.
So you are on here basically saying... I want to log as much time as possible , but I don't want to do the work to plan it properly. Exactly the type if attitude we do not need in new pilots.

Call your club your wanting to join and ask for a copy of the performance pages, since you are evaluating if their aircraft meet your needs, so you can make an informed decision to join or not.

How hard is that? Grow up.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 06:34 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DALFA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Posts: 1,508
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer View Post
I have to agree with JohnBurke!

Yes the "hours" matter, but people lose focus on the experience you need to gain during those hours.

I do see both sides however, so there's not any finger pointing here.

So my basic breakdown is;

1: lowest avg RPM setting per hour, so that could be slow taxi/time to runway(although least productive in experience gained)

2: pattern with full stop taxi back......some good experience hindered by taxi back

3: XC at L/D Max: slow, but most efficient cruise setting. Add a challenge of identifying checkpoints and off course deviations, amending your destination enroute, etc....

4: using #3 to get somewhere new, then practicing pattern there. Go to an airport you heard was a challenge, take the trip and make it a destination.

5: grab 2-3 friends and share the cost to go somewhere fun. They don't need to be pilot friends, take family, etc... Preferably you need to be comfortable with where you are going, and I highly recommend early in the morning or late afternoon if you have new flyers for less connective turbulence. This way you can run normal cruise settings also.

Take any of these scenarios, change your Wx mins, night flying, crosswinds, whatever you want to advance your skills. That is all I ask is you try to make the most out of each hour you are in the air
Thank you. This is the kind of feedback I was looking for. Not the "go figure it out yourself" or "just pencil whip" type of responses. This is a forum where people share experiences and advice, if you're too bothered to do that...just don't post and sit in your glass house.

I realize that sitting on the tarmac logging time is the cheapest way, and staying in the pattern doing full-stop taxi backs is also cheap but if you look at my original post you will see that i'm actually looking to fly places and gain new experiences from flying to different airports. Sorry if i'm trying to save a few bucks by going 70-80 over full throttle at 110. If you can't understand that, then you're the one that needs help.
DALFA is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 07:04 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

UnderOveur is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 07:12 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DALFA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Posts: 1,508
Default

It has nothing to do with being butt-hurt. It's just sad that so many have an ego the size of a blimp and instead of offering some good advice they thrive on belittling others and giving smart-ass responses. You're supposed to be a professional, act like one.
DALFA is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 08:22 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

UnderOveur is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 09:07 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DALFA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Posts: 1,508
Default

Thanks for proving my point.
DALFA is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 09:48 AM
  #29  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,021
Default

Go spread your garbage on another thread please.
You're the student pilot with the avatar of a 747, who began this mess, asking ridiculous questions (there is such a thing as a stupid question) and seeking the easiest way out.

Lift a finger to help yourself. Crack a book. Read. It's an important skill, and one day you may find it benefits you in this industry.

You're got zero experience or background, yet seem to know more than everyone else. Why do you suppose that is?

Nearly all of us are flight instructors, either former, or current (many both). All of us started from zero (your present position) before getting to where we are now, and nearly all of us see the fallacy in your gotta-have-it-now mentality.

You're really going to fly off those magic 1,500 hours, building time, in the hopes that it qualifies you for a job?
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 10:15 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default

I don't think it matters. You need the hours AND the experience and the delta (pardon the pun) between hobbes and tach is probably not that much. If you're worried about saving $$ and not the flying part, you might miss something important.

Best of luck.
N9373M is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJ85FO
Regional
34
04-17-2017 04:16 PM
2StgTurbine
Career Questions
2
09-30-2010 06:27 PM
Sniper
Aviation Law
13
11-15-2009 08:16 PM
SNIZ
Cargo
67
11-01-2008 11:02 AM
TOAD
Cargo
10
10-27-2006 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices