Contact approach altitude
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: CFII
Posts: 139
First, MVAs don't change hourly, unless the terrain changes hourly. ATC can only clear you in controlled airspace above the terrain, how you get there from an uncontrolled airport is your problem. A contact puts terrain clearance on the pilot's shoulders.
Second, scud running is a proven killer, so VFR might not be so good. Loads of instrument-rated pilots have come to grief trying to scud run, too. If you do get an IFR clearance, what's the concern for "staying out of the clouds"?
P
Third, your comment "at or below 3000'" sounds like you are confusing the contact approach with the cruise clearance. A contact approach doesn't require radar, but does require an available IAP at the destination.
Take from who's been to too many funerals-wait, get a clearance, fly the clearance and use the IAP, as published. Live long and prosper, by doing so.
GF
Second, scud running is a proven killer, so VFR might not be so good. Loads of instrument-rated pilots have come to grief trying to scud run, too. If you do get an IFR clearance, what's the concern for "staying out of the clouds"?
P
Third, your comment "at or below 3000'" sounds like you are confusing the contact approach with the cruise clearance. A contact approach doesn't require radar, but does require an available IAP at the destination.
Take from who's been to too many funerals-wait, get a clearance, fly the clearance and use the IAP, as published. Live long and prosper, by doing so.
GF
1)I've heard MVA's can/do change based on radar capability. (No radar=no MVA's)
(super duper radar wr3000 with optional wrx3216 capability vs bobs radar scope ) offer different accuracy and therefore different (higher) MVA for the poor controller working backup bobs radar.
2)
Didn't want to pick up ice.
3)
I believe "at or below xxxx " is phraseology for contact approach out of aim and "cruise xxxx" is phraseology for cruise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post