Ari Ben?
12-02-2006, 06:28 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
"You can still get away with saying that one person is PIC and the other is sole manipulator of the controls"
Really. Can you defend that with a FAR reference? I think that's a bit of a stretch. You're IMC and one guy is logging PIC as sole manipulator and the other as PIC? If the other guy is a CFI, then fine. You're saying two guys simultaneously log PIC if you simply declare the non-flying pilot as PIC in a light twin?
All I can say is I sure hope regional interviewers are putting pressure on guys that log a lot of this sort of time. This lowering the bar in experience standards has to stop.
Really. Can you defend that with a FAR reference? I think that's a bit of a stretch. You're IMC and one guy is logging PIC as sole manipulator and the other as PIC? If the other guy is a CFI, then fine. You're saying two guys simultaneously log PIC if you simply declare the non-flying pilot as PIC in a light twin?
All I can say is I sure hope regional interviewers are putting pressure on guys that log a lot of this sort of time. This lowering the bar in experience standards has to stop.
12-02-2006, 08:02 PM
#22
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by de727ups
Really. Can you defend that with a FAR reference? I think that's a bit of a stretch.
12-02-2006, 08:23 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: DHC-6 / PC-12
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by de727ups
"You can still get away with saying that one person is PIC and the other is sole manipulator of the controls"
Really. Can you defend that with a FAR reference? I think that's a bit of a stretch. You're IMC and one guy is logging PIC as sole manipulator and the other as PIC? If the other guy is a CFI, then fine. You're saying two guys simultaneously log PIC if you simply declare the non-flying pilot as PIC in a light twin?
All I can say is I sure hope regional interviewers are putting pressure on guys that log a lot of this sort of time. This lowering the bar in experience standards has to stop.
Really. Can you defend that with a FAR reference? I think that's a bit of a stretch. You're IMC and one guy is logging PIC as sole manipulator and the other as PIC? If the other guy is a CFI, then fine. You're saying two guys simultaneously log PIC if you simply declare the non-flying pilot as PIC in a light twin?
All I can say is I sure hope regional interviewers are putting pressure on guys that log a lot of this sort of time. This lowering the bar in experience standards has to stop.
12-03-2006, 04:21 AM
#24
Piper Commander
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: PA44 - Right
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by ConnectionPilot
do airlines look at how much PIC time you have or just multi, can't you log safety pilot time and log the multi time, but let the person under the hood log PIC?
12-03-2006, 03:40 PM
#28
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by AVIVIII
^^^ I cant decide if that was a good question or not...... ^^^
Half of me says that I probably know the answer, but the other half says that there's always that possibility...
Half of me says that I probably know the answer, but the other half says that there's always that possibility...
12-04-2006, 01:44 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: CA
Posts: 532
so basically when your a safety pilot and you pay for 100 hours, you only get 50, theoretically?
i'm looking at eagle and pinnacle as my two top regionals to apply to...does anyone know if pinnacle accepts this
i'm looking at eagle and pinnacle as my two top regionals to apply to...does anyone know if pinnacle accepts this
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
