Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Pilot Mill

Old 08-23-2014 | 05:44 AM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Skinny girl. Long legs. Big engines.
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Not to beat a dead horse, but have you considered the Air National Guard program? You can't buy better flight training at any price, and they'll PAY YOU to learn to fly, in jets, then the give you a job.

I did it both ways, started flying Cubs and C150's at FBO's, flew checks, then much later joined the Guard. My only regret is that I didn't join the Guard sooner!

^^^^^This is great advice. I'm helping my nephew get on this track right now.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 06:07 AM
  #22  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
You live in the Bay Area?
Northern California
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 06:19 AM
  #23  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
That disconnect is because "Regional Jets" didn't EXIST when we came up through the system, 30+ years ago.

There was no way in HELL any 500hr. 22yr. old kid was going to get a job in the right seat of a JET, with PEOPLE in the back, when we were flying checks at night in props, trying to build time to maybe one day get hired as a FLIGHT ENGINEER...

Then maybe, years and thousands of hours later, you'd get to the right seat of a jet...if your company didn't furlough you first.

I do fully support the 1500hr. rule, I only whish that when the RJ's were invented, it was already in place! They might never have grown to replace all the DC9's and 737-100+200's at the mainline in the first place!
The 1500 Hour requirement is arbitrary and capricious. If the FAA wanted to increase safety of regional airline crews, they should have focused like a laser on those that commute in on a red-eye and then show up to work and fly their regular line. I've had several in my jumpseat when I flew Chicago and New York red-eyes. But, I will agree that the 1500hr rule will put upward pressure on pay for regionals and increase the supply of ex-military pilots flying regionals.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 06:25 AM
  #24  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Send him to ATP. Zero to Hero in 180 days, with a guaranteed CFI job at the end.

I used to be an instructor there, and yes the students miss out on the whole $100 hamburger experience, but you get through your ratings very fast and they have good relationships with regional airlines to move onwards after you work as a CFI.

Also, this is an excellent way to prepare for structured airline environments and 'drinking from the fire hose' as a previous poster said.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 06:31 AM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by unitedflyier
It's all about timing. It can be the best job ever with lots of time at home with your family and enough cash to pay for your other half to stay at home for a few years. However if you get it wrong it can bankrupt you and your family chasing that dream.

Unfortunately none of us has a crystal ball so we will never know if our timing will be right.

Good luck to you all and krudawg glad you are retiring and I move up a number :-)
Well, I've been pushing to extend the flying age to 80; you want to sign my petition??? HA HA HA, only kidding.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 06:33 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Send him to ATP. Zero to Hero in 180 days, with a guaranteed CFI job at the end.

I used to be an instructor there, and yes the students miss out on the whole $100 hamburger experience, but you get through your ratings very fast and they have good relationships with regional airlines to move onwards after you work as a CFI.

Also, this is an excellent way to prepare for structured airline environments and 'drinking from the fire hose' as a previous poster said.
The only thing is the 50K price of admission. That's a big number.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 07:02 AM
  #27  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
The only thing is the 50K price of admission. That's a big number.
For sure it isn't cheap. But it is still cheaper than doing all of your flying at ERAU. Send him to a local state school for a generic business degree and you can probably save some cash.

Dealing with the small mom and pop FBOs is great for someone who isn't in a rush to get things done.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 07:03 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
The only thing is the 50K price of admission. That's a big number.

Dont let him get a degree in "aviation". Not worth the paper they are written on. Consider an aircraft partnership.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 07:07 AM
  #29  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
The 1500 Hour requirement is arbitrary and capricious. If the FAA wanted to increase safety of regional airline crews, they should have focused like a laser on those that commute in on a red-eye and then show up to work and fly their regular line. I've had several in my jumpseat when I flew Chicago and New York red-eyes. But, I will agree that the 1500hr rule will put upward pressure on pay for regionals and increase the supply of ex-military pilots flying regionals.
Any number is capricious.
The 1500 hr rule is the best thing to come along for many reasons in a long time. I only wish it was 1500 across the board. NO exceptions.
Reply
Old 08-23-2014 | 07:39 AM
  #30  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Any number is capricious.
The 1500 hr rule is the best thing to come along for many reasons in a long time. I only wish it was 1500 across the board. NO exceptions.
x2. While 1500 is somewhat arbitrary, it is far better than 250 in almost every case.

There's a lot to be learned between wet commercial and 1500. There's not as much to be learned between 1500 and say 2500, so 1500 is a good round number.

And anybody with less than 1500 has no business commenting on whether the 1500 rule is a good thing or not
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GizmoNC
Southwest
81
04-30-2013 06:33 PM
frogone
Flight Schools and Training
1
09-06-2011 10:37 PM
AZFlyer
Your Photos and Videos
2
12-10-2009 12:06 PM
greedyairlineexec
Major
13
01-02-2008 08:15 AM
Ellen
Regional
9
08-14-2007 08:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices