Search
Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Air France 447

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2009, 12:12 PM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

CNN international just reported that the Brazilian air force found two debris fields with recognizable signs of aircraft components (a seat, some life preservers) but no signs of survivors

God Bless
The Dominican is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:14 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by elfarto View Post
This is my First Post on this forum..so you will excuse my techical incompetence , as i'm more of an afficionado..


I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:

15 January 2009 - The EASA issues Emergency Airworthiness Directive No 2009-0012-E to address the above A330 and A340 Northrop-Grumman ADIRU problem of incorrectly responding to a defective inertial reference.



EASA Airworthiness Directives Publishing Tool

IF you look at the pdf inside that URL you will see that:

"An A330 aircraft experienced a sudden nose down order while in cruise. This
order was preceded by an automatic autopilot disconnection and triggering of the
“NAV IR1 FAULT” Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) Caution. "

There is also a procedure to recover from such cases of failure

- NAV - IR 1 2 (2 3) (1 3) FAULT
Note: Flight controls are in alternate law. Refer to F/CTL %u2013 ALTN LAW
(chapter 4 of the AFM)
Turn off the affected IRs.
Turn off the corresponding ADRs.
Set the affected IR mode rotary selectors to OFF.
Use AIR DATA switching as appropriate.
Use ATT HDG switching as appropriate.
Do not use speed brakes
-If CG above 32%:
Manually perform a forward fuel transfer from the trim tank.
Note: If trim tank pump is not available, do not perform manual forward fuel
transfer while speed is at or below 270 kt or while in climb.


Which seems to be a very similar scenario to the one at the moment of the accident.

Big Question:
Had the pilots been trained in that procedure.

BTW: I came across that EAD looking on wikipedia's ADIRU page:
Air Data Inertial Reference Unit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As your first post it appears like you are a reporter trolling for info......
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:15 PM
  #143  
Working Class Dog
 
11Fan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Spares Pusher
Posts: 1,668
Default

Did someone just elfarto?
11Fan is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:18 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

I'd rather have them troll here for information than airliners.net or some other forum.

What's real stupid is, why would someone come here and ask if the crew was training in this procedure? How would anyone here know? Perhaps an AF crew member could say if the company has implemented training, but that doesn't mean they were trained.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:23 PM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by elfarto View Post
This is my First Post on this forum..so you will excuse my techical incompetence , as i'm more of an afficionado..


I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:
You apparently have some spelling incompetence too!!

Originally Posted by 11fan
Did someone just elfarto?
I know something doesn't smell quite right!!
shiznit is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:25 PM
  #146  
Working Class Dog
 
11Fan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Spares Pusher
Posts: 1,668
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
...why would someone come here and ask if the crew was training in this procedure?
Please do not try to introduce logic into the equation. It's throws everything off.
11Fan is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:28 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Air France 447 - AFR447 - A detailed meteorological analysis - Satellite and weather data
Zoot Suit is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:29 PM
  #148  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
You apparently have some spelling incompetence too!!
You will excuse me as English is not my native language. ;-)

Glad you make fun out of my nick..!


And btw, i'm not trying to troll anything, i came across that piece of info and i wanted to share it.

Thanks!
elfarto is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:35 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1 View Post
There have been a number of accidents that have occurred while "whoop whoop pull up" was sounding. Two that I can come up with, off the top of my head, that were CFIT.
You're absolutely right... I meant EPGWS. Sorry for the confusion.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 01:37 PM
  #150  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,706
Default

I'm met Tim, the guy who wrote that analysis and runs the website (and writes great weather software). Very detailed fellow, ex-AF too. This weather analysis is a bit technical but very good.
iaflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tr disagree
Hangar Talk
1
06-26-2009 08:55 PM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 12:48 PM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 07:57 AM
ol'tigerguy
Cargo
8
02-24-2009 03:29 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices