Air France 447
#141
CNN international just reported that the Brazilian air force found two debris fields with recognizable signs of aircraft components (a seat, some life preservers) but no signs of survivors
God Bless
God Bless
#142
This is my First Post on this forum..so you will excuse my techical incompetence , as i'm more of an afficionado..
I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:
15 January 2009 - The EASA issues Emergency Airworthiness Directive No 2009-0012-E to address the above A330 and A340 Northrop-Grumman ADIRU problem of incorrectly responding to a defective inertial reference.
EASA Airworthiness Directives Publishing Tool
IF you look at the pdf inside that URL you will see that:
"An A330 aircraft experienced a sudden nose down order while in cruise. This
order was preceded by an automatic autopilot disconnection and triggering of the
“NAV IR1 FAULT” Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) Caution. "
There is also a procedure to recover from such cases of failure
- NAV - IR 1 2 (2 3) (1 3) FAULT
Note: Flight controls are in alternate law. Refer to F/CTL %u2013 ALTN LAW
(chapter 4 of the AFM)
Turn off the affected IRs.
Turn off the corresponding ADRs.
Set the affected IR mode rotary selectors to OFF.
Use AIR DATA switching as appropriate.
Use ATT HDG switching as appropriate.
Do not use speed brakes
-If CG above 32%:
Manually perform a forward fuel transfer from the trim tank.
Note: If trim tank pump is not available, do not perform manual forward fuel
transfer while speed is at or below 270 kt or while in climb.
Which seems to be a very similar scenario to the one at the moment of the accident.
Big Question:
Had the pilots been trained in that procedure.
BTW: I came across that EAD looking on wikipedia's ADIRU page:
Air Data Inertial Reference Unit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:
15 January 2009 - The EASA issues Emergency Airworthiness Directive No 2009-0012-E to address the above A330 and A340 Northrop-Grumman ADIRU problem of incorrectly responding to a defective inertial reference.
EASA Airworthiness Directives Publishing Tool
IF you look at the pdf inside that URL you will see that:
"An A330 aircraft experienced a sudden nose down order while in cruise. This
order was preceded by an automatic autopilot disconnection and triggering of the
“NAV IR1 FAULT” Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) Caution. "
There is also a procedure to recover from such cases of failure
- NAV - IR 1 2 (2 3) (1 3) FAULT
Note: Flight controls are in alternate law. Refer to F/CTL %u2013 ALTN LAW
(chapter 4 of the AFM)
Turn off the affected IRs.
Turn off the corresponding ADRs.
Set the affected IR mode rotary selectors to OFF.
Use AIR DATA switching as appropriate.
Use ATT HDG switching as appropriate.
Do not use speed brakes
-If CG above 32%:
Manually perform a forward fuel transfer from the trim tank.
Note: If trim tank pump is not available, do not perform manual forward fuel
transfer while speed is at or below 270 kt or while in climb.
Which seems to be a very similar scenario to the one at the moment of the accident.
Big Question:
Had the pilots been trained in that procedure.
BTW: I came across that EAD looking on wikipedia's ADIRU page:
Air Data Inertial Reference Unit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
#144
I'd rather have them troll here for information than airliners.net or some other forum.
What's real stupid is, why would someone come here and ask if the crew was training in this procedure? How would anyone here know? Perhaps an AF crew member could say if the company has implemented training, but that doesn't mean they were trained.
What's real stupid is, why would someone come here and ask if the crew was training in this procedure? How would anyone here know? Perhaps an AF crew member could say if the company has implemented training, but that doesn't mean they were trained.
#145
This is my First Post on this forum..so you will excuse my techical incompetence , as i'm more of an afficionado..
I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:
I've been some reseach and found some striking similarities between the sequence of events reported by ACARS and the following Emergency Airworthness Directive from 01/15/09:
Originally Posted by 11fan
Did someone just elfarto?
#146
#147
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
#148
New Hire
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
#149
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
#150
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post