Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

Planesense

Old 05-11-2019 | 02:54 AM
  #2051  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 504
Likes: 12
Default

Yes the Opspec require a SIC so all flight time counts towards the ATP.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 04:08 AM
  #2052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Default

They make people sign a training contract in this day and age? Unbelievable.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 06:56 AM
  #2053  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Question

Originally Posted by tanker
Yes the Opspec require a SIC so all flight time counts towards the ATP.
But if the flight is Part 91 (re-positioning for instance), then it won't count, right?
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 08:39 AM
  #2054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
But if the flight is Part 91 (re-positioning for instance), then it won't count, right?
If they have Op Spec A062 then 91 legs will still be legal loggable time.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 01:42 PM
  #2055  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 255
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by MaxMar
If they have Op Spec A062 then 91 legs will still be legal loggable time.
According to another post, 91 legs can be flown single pilot, so how an SIC be required? (just curious)
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 02:57 PM
  #2056  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 504
Likes: 12
Default

The FAA changed the regulations recently so that if a Company’s OpSpecs require a SIC for 91K or 135 then the SIC can log the time during the 91 legs. So basically the SIC remains a required crewmember for 91 legs and doesn’t revert to being a passenger for those legs.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 03:16 PM
  #2057  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 255
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by tanker
The FAA changed the regulations recently so that if a Company’s OpSpecs require a SIC for 91K or 135 then the SIC can log the time during the 91 legs. So basically the SIC remains a required crewmember for 91 legs and doesn’t revert to being a passenger for those legs.
So required if he is there, but not required if he’s not? That doesn’t really make any sense.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 04:14 PM
  #2058  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 504
Likes: 12
Default

In the case of PlaneSense the OpSpecs requires the SIC at all times, even under Part 91. Prior to the change in the regs it didn't matter what the OpSecs said because the FAA under Part 91 considered the SIC as a passenger not a required crewmember. Now with the change in the Regs as long as the OpsSpecs require a SIC for 91K and 135 then the SIC is also required for 91 and the FAA considers the SIC a required crewmember at all times. Therefore all flight time is loggable.
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 07:14 PM
  #2059  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tanker
In the case of PlaneSense the OpSpecs requires the SIC at all times, even under Part 91. Prior to the change in the regs it didn't matter what the OpSecs said because the FAA under Part 91 considered the SIC as a passenger not a required crewmember. Now with the change in the Regs as long as the OpsSpecs require a SIC for 91K and 135 then the SIC is also required for 91 and the FAA considers the SIC a required crewmember at all times. Therefore all flight time is loggable.

Which FAA regulation was changed and exactly which Planesense OpSpec requires an SIC under Part 91?
Reply
Old 05-11-2019 | 07:15 PM
  #2060  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 255
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by tanker
In the case of PlaneSense the OpSpecs requires the SIC at all times, even under Part 91. Prior to the change in the regs it didn't matter what the OpSecs said because the FAA under Part 91 considered the SIC as a passenger not a required crewmember. Now with the change in the Regs as long as the OpsSpecs require a SIC for 91K and 135 then the SIC is also required for 91 and the FAA considers the SIC a required crewmember at all times. Therefore all flight time is loggable.
Thanks for that. That makes sense, I must have misread the PIC-SP for 91 legs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Geronimo4497
Fractional
12
02-10-2006 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices