Search
Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

Planesense

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2016, 06:36 PM
  #471  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Rayeli View Post
Does that not strike you as odd? I've never heard in any field of a company making people pay to interview.
Kind of "low rent" but what I've come to expect of these guys.

Looks like they had a bad day last week

WTOC : FAA investigating after small plane crash at Savannah-Hilton Head Int'l Airport
Ifly4funnow is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 03:56 AM
  #472  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

Originally Posted by Rayeli View Post
Does that not strike you as odd? I've never heard in any field of a company making people pay to interview.
You must not have done many aviation interviews.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 06:29 AM
  #473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,327
Default

I know who was involved. And they are ok...

What's the scuttle?
feltf4 is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 07:43 AM
  #474  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

Originally Posted by feltf4 View Post
I know who was involved. And they are ok...

What's the scuttle?
Last I heard was that the engine was on fire before they hit the ground, but you know how it goes with eyewitness reports....

I'm glad they are ok too. Say what you will about the PC-12, no one has died in it as result of an engine failure.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 10:01 AM
  #475  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by HwkrPlt View Post
I'm glad they are ok too. Say what you will about the PC-12, no one has died in it as result of an engine failure.
You're right the PC12 is a great airplane but it only has one engine. I was never comfortable flying it in low IFR conditions down low or over water for that reason. The PT6 is a great engine but it has had a number of failures. Even worse are all the FCU failures that were occurring a few years back. Planesense had 2 of those alone. In one case the crew turned the plane into a glider and the other occurred on rollout so it was a non event. I've lost track of the total number of PC12s that had that particular problem and never once has a crew successfully recovered the engine with the MOR. Even Pilatus over-temped the engine on a test flight when simulating FCU failures.

I have several thousand hours in the PC12 and the King Air and I was always happier operating the King Air in marginal conditions. If I was sitting in the back I would want to be in the King Air or a Jet.

I think they've been pretty lucky, to date, given the conditions they ask their crews to operate the plane in.
Ifly4funnow is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 10:05 AM
  #476  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
Default

More Info

Aircraft with 2 passengers ends up in ditch at Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport | savannahnow.com
Ifly4funnow is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 02:50 PM
  #477  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Ifly4funnow View Post
Kind of "low rent" but what I've come to expect of these guys.

Looks like they had a bad day last week

WTOC : FAA investigating after small plane crash at Savannah-Hilton Head Int'l Airport

Originally Posted by Ifly4funnow View Post
You're right the PC12 is a great airplane but it only has one engine. I was never comfortable flying it in low IFR conditions down low or over water for that reason. The PT6 is a great engine but it has had a number of failures. Even worse are all the FCU failures that were occurring a few years back. Planesense had 2 of those alone. In one case the crew turned the plane into a glider and the other occurred on rollout so it was a non event. I've lost track of the total number of PC12s that had that particular problem and never once has a crew successfully recovered the engine with the MOR. Even Pilatus over-temped the engine on a test flight when simulating FCU failures.

I have several thousand hours in the PC12 and the King Air and I was always happier operating the King Air in marginal conditions. If I was sitting in the back I would want to be in the King Air or a Jet.

I think they've been pretty lucky, to date, given the conditions they ask their crews to operate the plane in.

Wow you felt you had to create a second "fake" profile just to come in and rag on Planesense? I don't care what you said, some of it I even agree with, but don't be a little pansy hiding behind a fake profile.
Docflyer is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 04:34 PM
  #478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by Ifly4funnow View Post
You're right the PC12 is a great airplane but it only has one engine. I was never comfortable flying it in low IFR conditions down low or over water for that reason. The PT6 is a great engine but it has had a number of failures. Even worse are all the FCU failures that were occurring a few years back. Planesense had 2 of those alone. In one case the crew turned the plane into a glider and the other occurred on rollout so it was a non event. I've lost track of the total number of PC12s that had that particular problem and never once has a crew successfully recovered the engine with the MOR. Even Pilatus over-temped the engine on a test flight when simulating FCU failures.

I have several thousand hours in the PC12 and the King Air and I was always happier operating the King Air in marginal conditions. If I was sitting in the back I would want to be in the King Air or a Jet.

I think they've been pretty lucky, to date, given the conditions they ask their crews to operate the plane in.

Originally Posted by Docflyer View Post
Wow you felt you had to create a second "fake" profile just to come in and rag on Planesense? I don't care what you said, some of it I even agree with, but don't be a little pansy hiding behind a fake profile.
Not sure what's going on or who this celebrity profile is. I have thousands of hours in PC12's and working for this company. and plenty of time in king airs. Last king air was a junk box. I'd gladly step into a pc12 again and fly it over and over again, without a question. That king air. Not so much.

Planesense is a safe company. Their maintenance is top notch and they know they need to be. 1 engine or 2 engines. Doesn't necessarily make it safe. 2 engines just gives the guy/gal a chance to screw up or get it right. (Look at the atr the decided to shut down the good engine) 1 engine gives you a chance to just get it right.

Lets face it, no matter how reliable an engine is. It's going to happen at one point. It's a machine built by a human being.

These two, one of which I know. Did the best they could to save themselves. So anyone that's ragging on a company for one engine failure that ended in what I would consider good terms should really, think before they do.

And just curious, what conditions do you think that Planesense pilots are asked to work in? I worked there for a number of years and I'm just curious as to what "conditions", might be, dangerous, or therefore, life threatening? And your credibility is extremely low on the shear fact that you say your uncomfortable operating a single engine airplane in low visibility or over water, but only "happy" flying a king air in marginal conditions...

Im making the assumption that you operate in >3 miles and 3,000' at all time. Or you just operate a 4 engine beast at all times for those "below marginal days"

Check your facts. The company has some of the best pilots from all walks of avaition including the two that were in that cockpit at the time. One of them a seasons PSI guy and the other from a big 3.
feltf4 is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 05:48 PM
  #479  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by feltf4 View Post
Not sure what's going on or who this celebrity profile is. I have thousands of hours in PC12's and working for this company. and plenty of time in king airs. Last king air was a junk box. I'd gladly step into a pc12 again and fly it over and over again, without a question. That king air. Not so much.

Planesense is a safe company. Their maintenance is top notch and they know they need to be. 1 engine or 2 engines. Doesn't necessarily make it safe. 2 engines just gives the guy/gal a chance to screw up or get it right. (Look at the atr the decided to shut down the good engine) 1 engine gives you a chance to just get it right.

Lets face it, no matter how reliable an engine is. It's going to happen at one point. It's a machine built by a human being.

These two, one of which I know. Did the best they could to save themselves. So anyone that's ragging on a company for one engine failure that ended in what I would consider good terms should really, think before they do.

And just curious, what conditions do you think that Planesense pilots are asked to work in? I worked there for a number of years and I'm just curious as to what "conditions", might be, dangerous, or therefore, life threatening? And your credibility is extremely low on the shear fact that you say your uncomfortable operating a single engine airplane in low visibility or over water, but only "happy" flying a king air in marginal conditions...

Im making the assumption that you operate in >3 miles and 3,000' at all time. Or you just operate a 4 engine beast at all times for those "below marginal days"

Check your facts. The company has some of the best pilots from all walks of avaition including the two that were in that cockpit at the time. One of them a seasons PSI guy and the other from a big 3.
Never said their pilots weren't good, just I wasn't comfortable operating a single engine airplane like an airliner. It's a personal preference.
Ifly4funnow is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 05:49 PM
  #480  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Docflyer View Post
Wow you felt you had to create a second "fake" profile just to come in and rag on Planesense? I don't care what you said, some of it I even agree with, but don't be a little pansy hiding behind a fake profile.
Odd response but I'm glad to hear we agree on much.
Ifly4funnow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Geronimo4497
Fractional
12
02-10-2006 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices