NetJets hiring

Reply Subscribe

Page 3 of 8

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-23-2007, 07:37 PM

#21

Ziggyfuzz

Line Holder

Joined APC: Sep 2007

Posts: 44

Yes you must find your own way to your base to begin your tour...no cass or other Jumpseat agreements...

09-24-2007, 09:24 AM

#22

Part135 Guy

Line Holder

Joined APC: Jul 2007

Position: Only Citations

Posts: 73

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThreeGreens

I read on the other website that NJ is done giring for the year? Any truth to this?

I spoke with someone in recruiting a few weeks ago. He said that he believed they were done hiring for 2007 but are continuing to interview for the Jan. class. He said the process takes about 4-5 months from receipt of resume to class assignment. So it sounds like even if they are done hiring for 07, the process is continuous and will keep moving for the first of the year hires. I'm not with NJ (yet!

).... sent my app in last week. So can anyone from NJ chime in on this?

09-24-2007, 08:52 PM

#23

jetlag7

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Dec 2005

Position: CL650

Posts: 238

Quote:

Originally Posted by CL-65DRIVER

Just wondering the reasons?? Ive been giving NJ a lot of thought seems like a good place. However My dream has always been to fly something big across water! But id be interested in hearing your reasons.

A very wise man once told me to pick a job based on Pay and Work Rules -- NEVER pick a job based solely upon the type of jets in a company's fleet.

I have friends flying for some real DIRT-BAG operations and getting abused daily just because they wanted to fly something heavy across the pond.

Food for thought......

09-29-2007, 11:26 PM

#24

DLAJ77

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2007

Position: rear GV

Posts: 294

Are a lot of guys going into the X?

09-30-2007, 06:38 AM

#25

dudemize

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Position: ANG

Posts: 276

Quote:

Originally Posted by DLAJ77

Are a lot of guys going into the X?

I think it varies a lot from class to class. In my indoc class a few weeks ago, I was the only X guy. There were about 8-10 guys going to the G200.

I know there are at least 3 X guys in the Oct indoc class. If I had a choice I would have picked anything but the X, but that's just me.

10-01-2007, 07:30 PM

#26

Spooledup

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jun 2007

Position: A320 CA

Posts: 243

Can you get hired into the G200 without any Gulfstream time?

10-01-2007, 11:31 PM

#27

So Wonwee

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Oct 2006

Posts: 471

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spooledup

Can you get hired into the G200 without any Gulfstream time?

Yes, you can get hired in all class 3 and below aircraft.

10-02-2007, 06:36 AM

#28

Bill Lumberg

Banned

Joined APC: Jul 2006

Position: Space Shuttle PIC

Posts: 2,007

Quote:

Originally Posted by dudemize

What don't you like about the X? I know the X crews work hard, but I hear the G200 and Sovereign fleets are getting busier. At least you didn't get a non-APU aircraft like the Ultra or Beechjet.

Last edited by Bill Lumberg; 10-02-2007 at 06:43 AM.

10-02-2007, 03:28 PM

#29

palgia841

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Oct 2006

Position: CRJ left

Posts: 248

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfly1975

Yeah I used Cheryl Cage for my interview prep. She was a a great help. I don't know how much it costs cause the company I was working for payed for it. It taught me a lot about how to interview and if I had to pay for it knowing what I know now I probably would.

The company you were working for paid for you to get one-on-one consulting so you could get your next job and leave them??? Not calling you a liar, but you gotta admit it sounds a little odd....

10-02-2007, 05:15 PM

#30

dudemize

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Position: ANG

Posts: 276

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg

What don't you like about the X? I know the X crews work hard, but I hear the G200 and Sovereign fleets are getting busier. At least you didn't get a non-APU aircraft like the Ultra or Beechjet.

Well I haven't even started aircraft training yet but I was hoping for something with shorter legs but I'm sure the X will be fun to fly. It is true that some of the other fleets are catching up a little bit. And yes I would have chosen the X over the non-APU aircraft.

Well, back to looking over the new proposal.