Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Fractional
SIDS & Obstacle Clearance >

SIDS & Obstacle Clearance


Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

SIDS & Obstacle Clearance

Old 09-18-2009 | 10:21 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
You always have to meet 3.3% or 200'/NM when departing IFR unless you've been specifically authorized otherwise.
I don't agree with that. I'm pretty sure the only regulatory issue is that you must clear obstacles by 35' and 200' laterally within the airport boundary, and within 300' beyond that.

"If you are using US Government NACO plates, obstacle climb gradients are indicated by a dagger symbology (sword); whereas, ATC climb gradients are published without any special symbology."

This is very good and probably the answer I'm looking for. Thank you for that.

Last edited by BIRDIE; 09-18-2009 at 10:56 PM.
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 10:28 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

.... and so in the absence of the dagger, 3.3 will keep you clear of obstacles, regardless of the published climb gradient on a SID. Is this correct?

Last edited by BIRDIE; 09-18-2009 at 11:03 PM.
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 10:31 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by steel
ODP is for (usually anyway) when ATC "isn't home", while SIDs require one speaking with ATC.
This is simply not true. SID's must be part of an ATC clearance while an ODP does not require a clearance. I would agree with that. But to say an ODP is there because ATC is not... well that is just bogus.
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 10:36 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

Uhh, yes it is, but good luck with what ever you're looking for....

fyi, if you are taking off out of an uncontrolled field IFR and get a departure time, what SID will you fly? SIDs aren't always part of an IFR clearance. ODPs aren't either. It depends on whether ATC supports the airport or not.

have fun...
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 10:43 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

ODP's need not be part of an IFR clearance. And if you believe that an ODP is there for a case when "ATC isn't home", I would ask your explanation for a departure from a runway that includes both an ODP and a SID for a 24 hour airport. But that would be going off on a tangent. Anyway, I think I got my answer from KC10 FATboy.

Last edited by BIRDIE; 09-18-2009 at 11:37 PM.
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 07:23 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Just remember that if departing an uncontrolled field when you can not maintain your own terrain separation and absent of any other clearance by ATC you must follow the ODP published on the back of the JEPP plate on the bottom box for the specific runway. Otherwise you must tell ATC that you can MAINTAIN YOUR OWN TERRAIN SEPARATION. Por ejemplo, try departing EGE or ASE by climbing to 400' and then turning on course maintaining a 3.3 degree climb gradient. In the real world we look at several different factors when it is IMC or night.

One-Engine-Inoperative Departure procedure-Aircraft Performance Group provides this data if required for that airport. *This will give you a non standard route to save your bacon if you bag a blower on departure*.
(I ALWAYS have this one in the back of my mind just incase)

JEPP DP on back of airport diagram for all-engines operative IMC departures

OR climb to 400' then proceed on course if their is no published ODP

Follow these steps at any airport and you will be safe. KC-10 is right that if non standard climb gradients are published for a SID and you are CLEARED via that SID then you must adhere to climb gradient or get a waiver from ATC regardless of whether it is for terrain, noise abatement or traffic.

Steel is also correct that if Tower is "home" you will not be doing a DP. You will either be cleared via a SID or given a heading to fly after takeoff to be funneled into the system. ODP=Uncontrolled field
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 09:14 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ovrtake92
Steel is also correct that if Tower is "home" you will not be doing a DP. You will either be cleared via a SID or given a heading to fly after takeoff to be funneled into the system. ODP=Uncontrolled field
All good comments and they are helpful. And certainly you must be able to comply with climb gradients when accepting a SID (based on all engines operating). I would just note that a SID is a DP, so to say that if the tower is "home" you will not be doing a DP is false. Also not true is ODP=Uncontrolled Field. That is incorrect. There are plenty of examples of runways served by both a SID and a ODP with a 24 hour control tower.

Reference the new Teterboro 6 off runway 1.

Last edited by BIRDIE; 09-19-2009 at 09:39 AM.
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 10:34 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

That is an interesting point, I wonder when if ever one would be issued a JEPP ODP from the back of the plate in lieu of a SID or Radar vectors at a tower operating airport. Maybe ATC does have the ability to issue a clearance like "fly the published ODP" But I have never heard of such a clearance. I make distiction between an airport diagram ODP and an actual dedicated SID.
In giving this further though I suppose that there might be a towered airport with mountainous terrain but is not served by a SID especially in other countries. This would definitely be a time where you would be cleared for takeoff but not given a SID or a radar vector but rather be expected to comply with the ODP on the back of the airport diagram. I havent ever run into this but now that I think of it, I bet it is fairly common in places like South America. Food for thought I guess.
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 12:29 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
If you are using US Government NACO plates, obstacle climb gradients are indicated by a dagger symbology (sword); whereas, ATC climb gradients are published without any special symbology.
I've been through the chart legend and looked over a variety of SIDs and have yet to see a dagger symbol. Please give a reference... anybody.
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 01:04 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Default

A 24 hour towered airport could still have a published ODP in the event the radar goes out.

Seems to me a SID of for ATC convenience. ie, they don't have to tell you the freqs / alts / routing if it's depicted and therefore makes their job easier.

An ODP, on the other hand, is simply to get the aircraft from the runway to the enroute structure without hitting dirt along the way. It's not for ATC, it's for the health of the pilot and pax.

I would also imagine that both SIDs and ODPs have to comply with the same climb gradient / terrain clearance requirements in the TERPs, but I could be wrong there. Just a hunch.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilkySmooth
Regional
18
09-17-2009 04:44 AM
jungle
Your Photos and Videos
1
08-08-2009 12:01 PM
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
21
06-05-2009 05:01 AM
iflyabeech
Hangar Talk
5
03-18-2009 02:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices