Management Assault
07-23-2018 | 08:59 PM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Here's a question.
In recent history F9 has paid for charter companies (SunCountry, Southern) to fly their planes and pilots with F9 passengers. This was to cover F9 schedules.
So, Why has mgmt cancelled vacations when they can just pay these charters to fly the uncovered schedules?
In recent history F9 has paid for charter companies (SunCountry, Southern) to fly their planes and pilots with F9 passengers. This was to cover F9 schedules.
So, Why has mgmt cancelled vacations when they can just pay these charters to fly the uncovered schedules?
Simple. They hate employees and will screw them over every chance they get. Pure vindictiveness. Nothing more.
07-23-2018 | 09:51 PM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,750
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
I agree. I believe the August vacation cancellation was just to **** us off. Let's be real; did they really need to cancel 140 pilots vacations? No way. How about cancel 25, that would have lightened up the open time. But 140!? It was a pure F U to us
07-23-2018 | 10:08 PM
#33
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Here's a question.
In recent history F9 has paid for charter companies (SunCountry, Southern) to fly their planes and pilots with F9 passengers. This was to cover F9 schedules.
So, Why has mgmt cancelled vacations when they can just pay these charters to fly the uncovered schedules?
In recent history F9 has paid for charter companies (SunCountry, Southern) to fly their planes and pilots with F9 passengers. This was to cover F9 schedules.
So, Why has mgmt cancelled vacations when they can just pay these charters to fly the uncovered schedules?
07-24-2018 | 03:55 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
07-24-2018 | 08:15 PM
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Not sure, but the company is cheap and not willing to give flying to another carrier unless it’s an absolute last resort. If they have aircraft and pilots to fly them, they will do everything within their legal power to complete flights in house before giving away revenue. Secondly, ALPA has defended these actions in the past stating the company was not in violation of our contract when exercising this option due to extenuating circumstances. Not that it would have stopped them but I don’t think the company would have received ALPA’s blessing this summer and I’m sure ALPA had a few legal avenues they could have pursued to make it less lucrative for the company if a contract violation did occur.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
