Search
Notices

Safety becon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2018, 08:17 AM
  #11  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 9
Default

On that note.. Is this something our union could push for legally? Requesting that all line pilots acting in any type of training capacity resign from doing so.

Does this make sense?
The union is spending resources informing/warning potential new hire candidates of the pitfalls of accepting a job at Frontier. But when those same pilots ignore this warning, and accept employment anyways. The Union stands idely by, while our Union brother and sister line pilots train them? How is this helping?

I thought the Company's inability to attract, train and retain new pilots was one of our largest bargaining chips. Every Union memo I get mentions this. Am I wrong?? Delusional? This whole process just sucks.
Revert is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 09:18 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

I’m guessing that that is a very fine line.

But, you’d think it would be obvious. I’m not sure how many hints the union has to put out.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 12:01 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 465
Default

Originally Posted by Missed Appch View Post
I completely agree. I wonder how many people have helped the company out by becoming the lowest paid check airman in the industry over the past year. But at least we are hiring some of the most unqualified candidates for them to fly with.
Absolutely, SE taxi is the only one I brought up on the board because there are easy and clear ways to defend why someone would not do this in regards to safety. There are so many other things our brothers and sisters should be doing that have nothing to do with safety but everything to do with following the letter of the contract. Yet they choose convenience, passengers, or personal desires over a greater purpose of getting this isht done. Then there are other things that have nothing to do with the contract but one would think it may be common sense, such as STAFFING. It is a big issue so anything that effects STAFFING an aircraft is simply delaying our goal. Worse yet, there are several who feel we just "need a raise" and will almost accept anything. They are clueless to happenings of the other pilot groups and think we actually have pretty good hear and just need a little more money. Holy batman wtf. Its a sad place right now, you'd think with as ruthless as this management team is that people would actually unite.
Gary et al is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 04:47 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,361
Default

How many different threads do we need to complain about the same thing?
dracir1 is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 05:01 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
How many different threads do we need to complain about the same thing?
Twelve. No more, no less.

Thanks for asking.

OpenClimb is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevjets
Union Talk
51
03-25-2017 09:29 AM
flyou11
Regional
11
07-18-2012 04:53 PM
MX727
Cargo
5
06-27-2012 05:26 PM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
05-23-2012 07:37 AM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
0
08-03-2009 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices