Search
Notices

Next steps...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:22 PM
  #31  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,348
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo View Post
With all these planes coming on line this year and the next, pilots leaving F9 and not getting the numbers to fill classes, something is going to have to give sooner than later? So if it is the distant future, will F9 be able to run their airline with the short staffing levels that we have already?
CX all vac, offer new hire bonus, sell delivery slots......
Indigo isn't going to give up a nickel. ...
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 10-12-2018, 10:26 PM
  #32  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,348
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA View Post
CX all vac, offer new hire bonus, sell delivery slots......
Indigo isn't going to give up a nickel. ...
Add increase block to 85+
Days off no more than 12

CBA ......pthhhhhh..operational need

And....when sick calls go thru the roof add an attendance policy......

We r far from the bottom
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 06:16 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA View Post
We r far from the bottom
Totally agree.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 09:28 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo View Post
With all these planes coming on line this year and the next, pilots leaving F9 and not getting the numbers to fill classes, something is going to have to give sooner than later? So if it is the distant future, will F9 be able to run their airline with the short staffing levels that we have already?
didn't the FAA say F9 can't take delivery of any new planes until the Mx program is fixed? what's going on with that?
spaaks is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 11:52 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingR6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: F9 FO
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA View Post
Add increase block to 85+
Days off no more than 12

CBA ......pthhhhhh..operational need

And....when sick calls go thru the roof add an attendance policy......

We r far from the bottom
Nailed it.

As far as the FAA allowing any more deliveries, it's my opinion that's why you saw the memo about "getting the a/c more mx touch time, and carrying more spares".
FlyingR6 is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 01:59 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks View Post
didn't the FAA say F9 can't take delivery of any new planes until the Mx program is fixed? what's going on with that?



That is not true! Delays are because of NEO engines.
Bolo is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 08:48 AM
  #37  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,348
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingR6 View Post
Nailed it.

As far as the FAA allowing any more deliveries, it's my opinion that's why you saw the memo about "getting the a/c more mx touch time, and carrying more spares".
They may also threaten to or actually close the denver base...... they closed DTW on spirit. ...
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 06:24 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA View Post
They may also threaten to or actually close the denver base...... they closed DTW on spirit. ...
That would cause the most enormous bump and flush in the history of airlines. The entire system would re-shuffle because 300 Denver captains would essentially have their pick of any other domicile and any other seat, for that matter. The number of involuntary displacements would be staggering. Talk about pouring accelerant on a dumpster fire!

Yeee haw.
OpenClimb is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 06:31 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
El Gipple's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo View Post
With all these planes coming on line this year and the next, pilots leaving F9 and not getting the numbers to fill classes, something is going to have to give sooner than later? So if it is the distant future, will F9 be able to run their airline with the short staffing levels that we have already?
That is the key. There is little leverage without help from the NMB which we all know is not happening anytime soon. The Company will deal when it makes sense for them to deal. Inability to staff the airline is where things are eventually going to give.

44 pilots have left the Company in 2018 with only 3 of them due to retirements. By my count, 7 CA's left for greener pastures (or possibly an early retirement from the sh!+show). Honestly, this number is lower than I would expect, BUT....combined with the failure to fill classes and plans for significant hiring over coming months, something is going to need to give.

Last edited by El Gipple; 10-14-2018 at 07:03 PM. Reason: Mispelling
El Gipple is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 06:38 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
El Gipple's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 29
Default

Not to mention the fact that average line values have climbed from 78.07/mo. to 81.77/mo. since January, getting pretty close to the CBA limitation of 85. Imagine how much more leverage we'd have if 38% of our pilots weren't averaging 100+ credit hours per month in 2018! Or the 13% crediting, on average, 130+ in 2018.
El Gipple is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Makanakis
Hawaiian
5
04-07-2016 10:42 AM
TimeLordPilot
Pilot Health
2
01-15-2013 03:50 AM
shiznit
Major
0
11-15-2010 01:54 PM
ryan1234
Money Talk
21
09-23-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices