Search

Notices

Contract 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2023 | 01:36 PM
  #131  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
If a company is being run properly premium shouldn’t exist. It’s just a mechanism for failure. It should certainly never be a selling point as if it is some sort of guarantee we all get. It should not have any bearing on rates since it should technically never happen. But that also means the argument that it should be 200% or more to start shouldn’t be a deal breaker either because again, if you (management) run the company properly 0% of pilots will get premium.
In theory, you are correct.

However, we all know that's an impossible feat. No way anyone (not mgt, me or you) can perfectly predict the amount of reserve use/sick/weather coverage a month ahead of time (or even a week or a few days). Premium is used after all else and does happen from time to time. For us, we've seen, it's not often. But lets not ignore it as an area for improvement.

I just don't want to give up true capital to get something the masses want more.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 01:45 PM
  #132  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
In theory, you are correct.

However, we all know that's an impossible feat. No way anyone (not mgt, me or you) can perfectly predict the amount of reserve use/sick/weather coverage a month ahead of time (or even a week or a few days). Premium is used after all else and does happen from time to time. For us, we've seen, it's not often. But lets not ignore it as an area for improvement.

I just don't want to give up true capital to get something the masses want more.
No doubt.

I would agree it’s pretty far down my list
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 02:06 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
In theory, you are correct.

However, we all know that's an impossible feat. No way anyone (not mgt, me or you) can perfectly predict the amount of reserve use/sick/weather coverage a month ahead of time (or even a week or a few days). Premium is used after all else and does happen from time to time. For us, we've seen, it's not often. But lets not ignore it as an area for improvement.

I just don't want to give up true capital to get something the masses want more.
You’re giving up a one time 50kish max for software that already exists out of a few billion to fix a clear problem. Just because there’s not much premium currently does not mean that will always be true. It’s not near the top of my list either but it’s a fairly inexpensive fix.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 05:07 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 115
From: 1900D CA
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
If a company is being run properly premium shouldn’t exist. It’s just a mechanism for failure. It should certainly never be a selling point as if it is some sort of guarantee we all get. It should not have any bearing on rates since it should technically never happen. But that also means the argument that it should be 200% or more to start shouldn’t be a deal breaker either because again, if you (management) run the company properly 0% of pilots will get premium.
No. The premium system is used by nearly every single airline. It allows the company to not carry a ton of reserves. It's mutually beneficial. It should and will stay.

Last minute things will always happen. Sick calls, broken planes, stranded crews, timed out crews. The only way to not have a premium or JA system is to carry to metric sh|t ton of reserves all the time. I want the premium system to stay
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 06:37 PM
  #135  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
You’re giving up a one time 50kish max for software that already exists out of a few billion to fix a clear problem. Just because there’s not much premium currently does not mean that will always be true. It’s not near the top of my list either but it’s a fairly inexpensive fix.
The word “fairly” is relative.

As I mentioned, even it if cost just $1 to actually fix, the company is likely to act like it costs much more and want to bargain something for it. Reason being is that the current system works just fine from their perspective.

If I never fly another premium trip for the rest of my career, i won’t lose a minutes sleep. Getting a premium trip is cool but It’s a BONUS. And given such, I dont want to lose out on the many other things I think are much more important.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 07:21 PM
  #136  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 120
From: Joystick Operator
Default

I know a lot of people who are leaving because this job doesnt have the pay or benefits that the legacies have.... Ontop of the normal operational BS we deal with on a daily basis, I dont blame them.

If F9 wants to be successful and grow, they need to attract good candidates and be able to keep them through their careers. But when you have no min day, low rates, meh insurance. no good LTD. no good flight benefits (will change naturally if we grow). Not much premium offered. Most flights you get on are delayed at least 30 mins usually. Waiting for gates. issues with gate agents. It all adds up.

Contract is an easy way to attract and keep pilots. The other stuff is pretty simple to fix, but I guess it just isn't bad enough to where they want to yet. Although I did hear rumors of gate agents being F9 employees in domiciles being talked about.

The fact I have to call ops 3 times to get a reply or just hear nothing at all is horrific. Never happened on any DL/UA/AA flights I did at my regional.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 08:40 PM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
The word “fairly” is relative.

As I mentioned, even it if cost just $1 to actually fix, the company is likely to act like it costs much more and want to bargain something for it. Reason being is that the current system works just fine from their perspective.

If I never fly another premium trip for the rest of my career, i won’t lose a minutes sleep. Getting a premium trip is cool but It’s a BONUS. And given such, I dont want to lose out on the many other things I think are much more important.
Actual costs are agreed upon before negotiations even start. The company does not disagree with costs. You should just stop while you’re behind on your arguments.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 09:40 PM
  #138  
madmax757's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 31
From: seated - facing forward
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
I know a lot of people who are leaving because this job doesnt have the pay or benefits that the legacies have.... Ontop of the normal operational BS we deal with on a daily basis, I dont blame them.

If F9 wants to be successful and grow, they need to attract good candidates and be able to keep them through their careers. But when you have no min day, low rates, meh insurance. no good LTD. no good flight benefits (will change naturally if we grow). Not much premium offered. Most flights you get on are delayed at least 30 mins usually. Waiting for gates. issues with gate agents. It all adds up.

Contract is an easy way to attract and keep pilots. The other stuff is pretty simple to fix, but I guess it just isn't bad enough to where they want to yet. Although I did hear rumors of gate agents being F9 employees in domiciles being talked about.

The fact I have to call ops 3 times to get a reply or just hear nothing at all is horrific. Never happened on any DL/UA/AA flights I did at my regional.
Just call once. Then go back to looking at your phone.
Reply
Old 03-03-2023 | 03:53 AM
  #139  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Actual costs are agreed upon before negotiations even start. The company does not disagree with costs. You should just stop while you’re behind on your arguments.
That’s not true at all. After speaking with both my CA rep and my FO rep it turns out this is literally what the negotiators do during contract time. By the time they all come to the table they know what topics are being asked for based on what was sent to the MEC from the pilot surveys. From there the company argues that contract improvement 1 is worth X while our negotiators argue the value is Y. When they agree on a value the discrepancy disappears and language gets codified into a new contract.
Reply
Old 03-03-2023 | 06:09 AM
  #140  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Actual costs are agreed upon before negotiations even start. The company does not disagree with costs. You should just stop while you’re behind on your arguments.
LOL coolaid, you can’t actually believe this…..

So all areas of the contract already have an agreed upon price prior to negotiation. Everything.

LTD - check. That costs X.
Revised reserve rules - check. Those cost Y.
And so on.

And ALL airlines run negotiations this way?

My bad dawg, I had no idea. I’ll stop while I’m behind…

Last edited by dracir1; 03-03-2023 at 06:29 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices