![]() |
[QUOTE=Hedley;3878670]Not necessarily. You maintain your respective contracts until after the JCBA is completed. Once the JCBA is agreed to, both sides are then paid according to the new contract. When the SLI is subsequently completed, the two groups can begin to play together.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/ You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent. |
[QUOTE=Flyhigh44;3878731]
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3878670)
Not necessarily. You maintain your respective contracts until after the JCBA is completed. Once the JCBA is agreed to, both sides are then paid according to the new contract. When the SLI is subsequently completed, the two groups can begin to play together.
In the case of the UAL/CAL merger, it was announced in 2010, JCBA completed in 2012, and the SLI finalized in 2013.[/ You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent. |
Spirit is NOT going to happen....... how long do we "realistically" wait to ask to be released......
we all know the company will never come to the table with any intention of any agreement. |
Originally Posted by ReserveCA
(Post 3878742)
Spirit is NOT going to happen....... how long do we "realistically" wait to ask to be released......
we all know the company will never come to the table with any intention of any agreement. |
Originally Posted by Flyhigh44
(Post 3878731)
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent.
In the CAL/UAL case it turns out that wasn't applicable. CAL was hiring and had a slightly higher paying contract while UAL had people on furlough. Once the merger was announced, CAL didn't want to hire off the street with UAL pilots on furlough but couldn't legally recall pilots on another list at that point. The two unions worked out an agreement where furloughed pilots could be "hired" by CAL, they started at the bottom of the list but weren't probationary pilots and were started out at their pay longevity at the time of their furlough. It was a voluntary program and when the SLI came out everyone moved to their appropriate slot. Not really relevant to this potential deal, but it's just an interesting piece of airline history. |
[QUOTE=Flyhigh44;3878731]
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3878670)
You are incorrect. They will have to so there is no growth on the lower paid airline over the one that is paid more. It’s called leveling up. Everything else is correct. I have been through one. As far as seniority. You can most likely expect relative seniority +or- 1 percent. |
Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
(Post 3878797)
Just stirring the pot with no information
|
Not really impressed with the strike lanyard.....
isnt't the idea to grab attention? why not fluorescent green with blood red lettering? Afraid to tick mgmnt off? |
Lastly....
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew ? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing. |
Originally Posted by ReserveCA
(Post 3878912)
Lastly....
indigo is a holding company. They just happen to fly airplanes. Their whole livelihood is based on a spreadsheet, keeping it in the black. Why would they undergo a purchase of a larger company whose spreadsheet is completely in the red with no hopes of getting above board? where are they going to cut costs flight crew? cabin crew ? gate agents ? ramp crew? they're already running so short as it is above and below wing. My guess is you'll hear something soon, or something not soon. Just my opinion. I don't see them breaking the bank to do it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands