Class Dates
#61
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 1
Yeah we’re getting hit with the expanded Pratt inspections that just got announced they’re planning on us being over staffed this summer due to it.
#62
Almost there
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 118
I don’t disagree and think they know something they aren’t telling us yet. Day trips being more efficient don’t account for this much reduction in hiring. Do you have any updated article that mentions it?
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,750
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
Right now, isn't our fleet only about 30 Pratt powered planes out of 130+ fleet?
#64
Almost there
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 118
25/136 to be exact. So we should almost double our P&W fleet by end of next year.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,750
Likes: 99
From: 1900D CA
#66
New Hire
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
The Pratt inspections are for engines produced mid 2021 and earlier. I believe all of ours are after that date and don't apply.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
I find it hard to believe that P&W would sell engines to Airbus with a known defect and Airbus would just ignore that defect and deliver them to customers with a note:
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT"
The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries.
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT"
The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries.
#68
I find it hard to believe that P&W would sell engines to Airbus with a known defect and Airbus would just ignore that defect and deliver them to customers with a note:
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT"
The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries.
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT"
The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



