Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
We are all on the same team here >

We are all on the same team here

Search

Notices

We are all on the same team here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2026 | 04:58 AM
  #121  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 542
Likes: 125
Default

Originally Posted by I like BIG Bus
Yeah, you’re right, I think the 163 and 167 reps should be recalled for what they did, but I’m not gonna campaign for it.
Yeah nice try.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 05:54 AM
  #122  
P/T Gear Slinger
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 879
Likes: 36
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by I like BIG Bus
Yeah, you’re right, I think the 163 and 167 reps should be recalled for what they did, but I’m not gonna campaign for it.
Well, that makes exactly 1 of you. Go for it.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 06:12 AM
  #123  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by BagMan
1) NC gone

the NC had made no progress since the beginning of negotiations, had no leverage and no plan other then to keep showing up until until we get released. A strategy that may have worked save the fact that the Mediator is recommending his removal in the round about way he has to. If we keep sending the NC back the very core of our strategy is not going to work.

2) MEC QUIT
He quit. After a two month delay in meetings he quit, now he wants another two months because our now former MEC thinks he should chose our LECs. no negotiations for four more months.

3) Scheduling Chair
If we actually have a person who's job it is to deal with scheduling, trips and problems over the past few years. and you honestly think that person should remain at their job. Lets just leave it at this "If you want me to vote out 169 and 165 YOU ARE MAKING A VERY POOR CASE" - Either make a case or ****. Many of us are growing tired of your pearl clutching and whining.

If these people were function even at a low level this wouldn't be happening. At this point you sound like the MSM trying to convince the public Joe Bidan is "Sharp as a Tack" after his debate meltdown. If the Union was functioning you might have a pot to **** in or a leg to stand on. as it is you don't and you don't
If the NC had "no plan," then that blame should be placed squarely where it belongs: on the reps. Specifically, it was LECs 165 and 169 whose great idea it was to cancel strategic planning in favor of a picket. The reps own the strategic plan and set direction; the NC executes on that plan and direction. In this case, the NC had neither a plan nor direction because LECs 165 and 169 have been playing games and dividing this pilot group for the last year and a half. Your frustrations regarding the NC should be directed right where they belong—to the reps of 165 and 169!

Also, the mediator never recommended anyone's removal. That is false. The people in the room have confirmed it is false. Stop parroting this tired old MP talking point. That, coupled with his comms—wow, that guy truly has a strange relationship with the truth.

You want a plan and to fix this mess? Look no further than your printer and find the nearest pen to mail in a petition to recall LECs 165 and 169.

Need a form and don't know where to go? Ask the 163 or 167 reps—I'm sure they can point you in the right direction.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 06:57 AM
  #124  
P/T Gear Slinger
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 879
Likes: 36
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by MPmonopolyCEO
You want a plan and to fix this mess? Look no further than your printer and find the nearest pen to mail in a petition to recall LECs 165 and 169.
Did I read somewhere on FB anyone could sign the petition, it didn't matter whether you were a 165/169 member?
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 07:10 AM
  #125  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
Did I read somewhere on FB anyone could sign the petition, it didn't matter whether you were a 165/169 member?
To sign the petition for a special LEC meeting, you must be a member of 165 or 169.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 07:17 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,754
Likes: 57
Default

Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
Did I read somewhere on FB anyone could sign the petition, it didn't matter whether you were a 165/169 member?
You probably did read that on fb but you have to be 165/169. There’s only really one way to find out for sure what the majority of all (no shame in person last min den only election) of those pilots want. After that we can move forward.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 07:23 AM
  #127  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by InformationMike
Let's hope you're right. Even 18 months from now seems brutal, but it may take longer. Hopefully that gets us referencing new contracts, and any retro reflects time on property enduring this nonsense.
Retro?

Retro pay is meant to make us whole for the period of company delay. Generally, you don't get retro pay for periods where the union is at fault for the delay.

I love when LEC 169 (MP) states, "This wasted over $70,000 of our membership dues," in his most recent communication when discussing the cost of an MEC meeting where he was (rightfully) denied a quorum by LECs 163 and 167.

Hey MP, how about the $70,000+ you took out of the pockets of every 12+ year CA at this airline in retro pay they will now (likely) not be receiving? Did you give that much thought before you pulled your stunt last week?
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 07:36 AM
  #128  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 126
Default

Originally Posted by I like BIG Bus
if you look through this thread it’s the same 5 people on this website frothing at the mouth calling for people in a different LEC to recall their reps. That’s 5 people out of 2300. If they think bitching and moaning on APC is going to get 169 to recall their reps they haven’t talked to very many 169 pilots. They want to talk about egos. MM flat out lied on those hit pieces he dropped going out the door. Kind of lets you know what kind of person and leader he was. We have a lot of smart, qualified and experienced people at this airline. I’m sure we can get those rolls filled quickly with motivated individuals. I swear if I heard “what are you willing to give up for that” one more time I was going to vomit. Instead of freaking out over this. Let’s find those people and pick up the ball and run, not throw more grenades and drag this out even further. That sounds like something a company plant or union buster would want to happen. Sack up!! .

Edited for sp
If only there was poll or something official that had been pushed forward to back your position instead of talking to a few people and assuming they speak for us all.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 07:44 AM
  #129  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 184
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by MPmonopolyCEO
Retro?

Retro pay is meant to make us whole for the period of company delay. Generally, you don't get retro pay for periods where the union is at fault for the delay.

I love when LEC 169 (MP) states, "This wasted over $70,000 of our membership dues," in his most recent communication when discussing the cost of an MEC meeting where he was (rightfully) denied a quorum by LECs 163 and 167.

Hey MP, how about the $70,000+ you took out of the pockets of every 12+ year CA at this airline in retro pay they will now (likely) not be receiving? Did you give that much thought before you pulled your stunt last week?
correct…let that sink in folks. The 12-24 months this clown show just set us back will not be considered in whatever “retro” we negotiate. The company will say it’s not their fault we couldn’t negotiate in those months and they would be right.
Reply
Old 04-29-2026 | 08:08 AM
  #130  
I like BIG Bus's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
If only there was poll or something official that had been pushed forward to back your position instead of talking to a few people and assuming they speak for us all.
That polling is garbage and old, taken before a lot of things have happened. As I pointed out previously, that polling shows that almost 80 percent don’t think the NC was doing a “very good job”. Have fun in your little APC echo chamber getting all fired up. You guys are now going to try and delay things even more trying to get whatever retribution you feel is deserved by doing the same thing you are that you feel somebody else did for what they felt as elected representatives of their pilot group. And doing so after many months of airport sits and discussions that they felt was for the betterment of our union. Chew on that for a while. Like it or not what’s happened has happened. Why don’t you pick up the phone or send an email and get the side of the story you supposedly know all about. And if you’re such an expert on everything that is going on, why don’t the lot of you volunteer for a position. You seem like you could make a great contribution. There are plenty of openings apparently. Seems to me that people resigning all over the place really weren’t in it for the pilot group they were in it for themselves and their buddies. There has been a concerted effort to oust MP since he took office as well as a concerted effort to put a “MM yes” vote in our FO rep spot. All spearheaded mostly by pilots that aren’t in 169 and one that holds a huge personal grudge. Why don’t you wait and see what happens before picking up a pitch fork and joining the angry mob. I know one of the pilots that is going to run for the MEC chair position and his credentials are stellar. You can’t possibly think that MM was a great chair. He basically admitted it himself. Let’s move on. This union will be much stronger going forward.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stonewall
FedEx
80
03-10-2026 03:47 PM
Cptdondo
Flight Schools and Training
6
04-07-2017 04:46 PM
hepcat13
Corporate
31
02-11-2016 08:04 PM
pilot0987
Your Photos and Videos
2
11-13-2012 06:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices