Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
DARPA robot lands sim 73 >

DARPA robot lands sim 73

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

DARPA robot lands sim 73

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2017, 04:19 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 18
Default

Reversing decades of CRM development and leaving it where the capt is king or a ground controller.... Give it a break people. Its hardly happening soon and is no where clear cut as some people make it out to be. Aviation is currently very very safe. Stuff like this will see a increase in incidents.
360nki is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 08:03 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

When the robot can land in 35kt crosswinds following a heavy that went high on the glide slope and go around due to wind shear and perform a flawless pattern back again to land in those conditions call me.

Until then I'm getting sick of chicken little crowing about the end of humans in the cockpit. My kid could land a straight in sim with no wind. Big deal.
labbats is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 07:42 AM
  #13  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

The real problem with the next level of automation is it will lower pilot salaries, not eliminate them.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-18-2017, 09:37 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop View Post
Single pilot cargo aircraft in 10 years or less.
I bet not!!
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:04 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 209
Default

So it can land like any other cat3 capable autopilot out there. Can it put the plane in a position to make that autoland? These things make big headlines but the simple fact is automation is still no where near as capable at making decisions as the human brain.

Stick and rudder is one aspect. Judgement and decision making skills are another.
Sam York is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:35 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by Sam York View Post
So it can land like any other cat3 capable autopilot out there. Can it put the plane in a position to make that autoland? These things make big headlines but the simple fact is automation is still no where near as capable at making decisions as the human brain.

Stick and rudder is one aspect. Judgement and decision making skills are another.
Agreed, even then, I still believe stick and rudder skills are important. Anyone who scoffs at them and say they aren't should not be a pilot. Complacency kills, look at that Korean who plunged the 777 into the SFO sea wall. Autopilot isn't doing what you want it to do? Click it off and hand fly it.
C130driver is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:23 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 209
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Agreed, even then, I still believe stick and rudder skills are important. Anyone who scoffs at them and say they aren't should not be a pilot. Complacency kills, look at that Korean who plunged the 777 into the SFO sea wall. Autopilot isn't doing what you want it to do? Click it off and hand fly it.
Yeah I didn't mean to imply otherwise. Stick and rudder or otherwise known as "pilot sh1t", be it VFR or IFR stick and rudder skills, are the base of the pilot flying skills.

Just like fitness is the base for most athletics. In my bike racing days if you didn't have base fitness you wouldn't be fast, your handeling skills would suck and you can't think and make good decisions while turning your lungs inside out. Stick and rudder skills are the same. Don't have that the rest suffers.
Sam York is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:41 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Agreed, even then, I still believe stick and rudder skills are important. Anyone who scoffs at them and say they aren't should not be a pilot. Complacency kills, look at that Korean who plunged the 777 into the SFO sea wall. Autopilot isn't doing what you want it to do? Click it off and hand fly it.
This is why I think it's more likely to see one human/one robot vs. total automation with no pilot. One compliments the other.
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 05:19 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe View Post
First, it was the PFE/FE to go. Now it looks as though FO's heads are on the chopping block!



atp
FOs??? They'll definitely chop the captains first. A) FOs are cheaper, and B) no self respecting robot pilot will do the walk around.

;D
Whiskey4 is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 06:56 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 461
Default

Originally Posted by Whiskey4 View Post
FOs??? They'll definitely chop the captains first. A) FOs are cheaper, and B) no self respecting robot pilot will do the walk around.

;D
(*slow clap*)

This is beautiful...
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-23-2013 06:49 PM
crflyer
Regional
13
07-30-2012 11:06 PM
seamonster
Major
52
06-08-2012 06:42 AM
TripleSeven
Flight Schools and Training
9
09-13-2006 04:55 PM
Z_Pilot
Major
4
05-05-2006 09:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices