Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Many Commitments for Electric Training Plane >

Many Commitments for Electric Training Plane

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Many Commitments for Electric Training Plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2019 | 11:43 AM
  #11  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,272
Likes: 260
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Making batteries five times more efficient (ie specific energy) than today's commercially available batteries equates to the absolute theoretical chemical max of about 1,000 Wh/Kg.

Kerosene specific energy is 12,000 Wh/Kg.

If you have an interest in electric planes, you need to understand that 12 to 1 specific energy advantage of jet fuel. And that's only with a 500% improvement in current batteries (theoretical max).
[RANT]There are fewer things in my life I have found more frustrating than explaining the laws of thermodynamics to avid environmentalists. I can understand them not being able to get it, there are a lot of people in our society that haven’t the most basic understanding of science or technology. It’s the head-patting and condescension from the people who don’t have a clue about what you just said, far less the immutability of it that gets me. It reminds me vaguely of when the Indiana State legislature had a bill before it to change the value of pi in the state of Indiana to 3.2.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasm.../#5b3e2544260a

[/RANT]

Reply
Old 07-25-2019 | 06:42 AM
  #12  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 43
From: Paahlot
Default

Electric will never be more then a niche.
Think everything that’s got a snowmobile engine now...oh I’m sorry I meant Rotax.
Reply
Old 07-25-2019 | 07:46 PM
  #13  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,073
Likes: 103
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Making batteries five times more efficient (ie specific energy) than today's commercially available batteries equates to the absolute theoretical chemical max of about 1,000 Wh/Kg.

Kerosene specific energy is 12,000 Wh/Kg.

If you have an interest in electric planes, you need to understand that 12 to 1 specific energy advantage of jet fuel. And that's only with a 500% improvement in current batteries (theoretical max).
It's actually closer to 6 to 1, because electric motors are close to 2x more efficient than jet engines.

Still way too far out to be practical, obviously.
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 07:21 AM
  #14  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,179
Likes: 807
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dera
It's actually closer to 6 to 1, because electric motors are close to 2x more efficient than jet engines.

Still way too far out to be practical, obviously.
Still have transmission and control losses, but the inherent efficiency of electric motors would enable better use of the energy deliver to the motor. Might close the gap to 8 to 1, bearing in mind there are some incremental improvements in jet engines coming down the pipe.
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 07:18 PM
  #15  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Making batteries five times more efficient (ie specific energy) than today's commercially available batteries equates to the absolute theoretical chemical max of about 1,000 Wh/Kg.

Kerosene specific energy is 12,000 Wh/Kg.

If you have an interest in electric planes, you need to understand that 12 to 1 specific energy advantage of jet fuel. And that's only with a 500% improvement in current batteries (theoretical max).
The science community has bet the entire planet on inventing that battery in the next decade. This will go down in history as mankind's biggest mistake.
Reply
Old 07-31-2019 | 01:15 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

My question is, what is the recharge time on these? If they are targeting the flight training market, many flights schools fly back to back flights in the same airplanes all day long. Even an hour recharge time would be a significant issue to many flight school as far as aircraft utilization goes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BFMthisA10
Air Wisconsin
24
11-03-2021 08:12 PM
TonyC
FedEx
27
01-23-2019 06:06 PM
okieskies99
United
4
07-03-2017 11:55 PM
Nevets
Regional
80
07-30-2009 07:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices