Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Saab 2000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #1  
atpwannabe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default Saab 2000

Does anyone have any info on any American companies that fly the Saab-2000? One of my fellow co-workers is from Croatia and rated as a PP. We got to talking and he mentioned that the 2000 was a very reliable a/c. Just curious.

Any info would be great.



atp
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Airliners.net had this to say about the Saab 2000

Lack of sales and profitability forced Saab to cease 340 and 2000 production, with the lines winding up in 1998. The last 2000 was delivered to Crossair in April 1999.


In 2000, 54 were in airline service with three used as corporate transports


From what I can tell, they are only used in Europe as a regional. Hendricks Motorsports does own/use two for Corporate shuttle use.
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 12:18 PM
  #3  
Andrew_VT's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 2
Default

What a shame too. If I remember correctly they cruised at 350 ktas (compared to the 275 for the sf340) and would make a perfect 50 seat RJ replacement with high oil prices.

I'd be very interested to know the comparable fuel burns over a given route.
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
III Corps's Avatar
No one's home
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe
Does anyone have any info on any American companies that fly the Saab-2000? One of my fellow co-workers is from Croatia and rated as a PP. We got to talking and he mentioned that the 2000 was a very reliable a/c. Just curious.

Any info would be great.



atp
The 2000 was a follow on to the Saab 340 but it was much like the Lockheed Electra in that it got caught in the transition period between fast turboprops and RJs. The airplane was in fact much more advanced than many of the RJs but the public didn't want to see those swingy things in the air.. they assumed that swingy things were throw backs when in fact, the 2000 was fast, economical, could haul a load and had numerous advances including anti-noise or active noise where you analyze the noise and create the same wave but 180 out of phase.

SAAB used multiple Cray computers to study noise and how it was transmitted both airborne and structure borne. The props were shaped by studies and the engines were located after CRAY computers showed noise paths. BUT.. SAAB ran into problems with feel...control feel. The control feel changed significantly with configuration and speed. So while they were much ahead of everyone else initially, they fell behind and were overtaken by the RJs while the solved their problems.

First was a MECs which wa a Mechanical Elevator Control system which was replaced by a PECs which was a Powered Elevator Control. By the time they got it sorted out, the RJs had passed them by and everyone wanted JETS although the JETS could carry people and fuel, bags and fuel, people and bags but NOT people, bags AND fuel. SAAB decided to fold the tent unfortunately.

One thing... never drink with the Swedes. They will have you blind in an hour with all their toasts and good will... but they can build airplanes. Although they are not a front line show, their Tunan was a good machine followed by the radical Draken and then the Viggen and now the Gripen.. a very nice little machine that can operate essentially off your country road.
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Chevy Lumina - Left
Default

Joe Gibbs racing
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
ce650's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: EVIL PRIVATE JET
Default

I believe general motors had a couple at one time . I know hendrick racing has 3 the last time I saw them
Reply
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:42 PM
  #7  
atpwannabe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

Great historical and interesting information guys.

It just seems to be beyond me that most regionals are getting rid of their TP a/c. Given the price of oil, albeit its down compared to maybe a couple of weeks ago, these a/c just seem to be more fuel efficient, profitable in terms of cost, and loved by the people that fly'em.

atp
Reply
Old 02-07-2008 | 04:49 AM
  #8  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

It's public perception. If it has props, it's a "Small plane."
Reply
Old 02-07-2008 | 04:51 AM
  #9  
Toejam's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: 320A
Default

People loved riding horses, until they started driving cars...
Reply
Old 02-07-2008 | 07:59 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

Good info IIICorps
I bet that 2000 is NEVER weight restricted. Unlike the RJ's. I have 5k plus on the SF340, great airplane.Give me the 2000 over any POS RJ.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Regional
2
01-30-2008 12:11 PM
coryk
Regional
5
10-15-2007 05:51 PM
Cessnadriver
Regional
16
09-09-2007 05:27 PM
DMBinHBurg
Regional
10
08-26-2007 07:20 PM
N618FT
Regional
11
07-29-2007 09:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices