Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Useless radio phraes >

Useless radio phraes

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Useless radio phraes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2006 | 03:17 PM
  #41  
Kill Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by hyflyt560
Direct-To (VTO) the VNAV point...not an issue.
direct where? and if you fly past TOD don't you have to catch up someplace?
Reply
Old 01-23-2006 | 09:06 PM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kill Bill
direct where? and if you fly past TOD don't you have to catch up someplace?
Currently flying Primus 1000 in one plane and FMS 3000 in another. Both allow you to go direct (vertically, or "VTO") to a VNAV altitude regardless of routing. Granted, if you go 80 miles past your TOD, a problem would exist, but a few miles?! That's what's not an issue. It's been almost 4 years on furlough from UAL, I have not the foggiest how the VNAV worked "back in the day."
Reply
Old 01-24-2006 | 07:49 AM
  #43  
Kill Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in the 737, you're already behind as soon as you start down at TOD...
Reply
Old 01-24-2006 | 04:12 PM
  #44  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

You ever up in ANC in the afternoon (usually)? There is a guy on approach that uses tree and fife, etc.

I had never heard this before, until I read an article in AOPA making fun of this. We tried to respond professionally using tree and fife, and lost it in mid-tranmission.

I can hear it in the other aircraft's transmission that nearly everyone is equally amused.

THe AIM prints proper phraseology. The majority of people I know use practical phraseology, i.e. short and sweet.
I think this parallels the industry and the FAA. WHat's practical vs. what's proper.
Reply
Old 01-30-2006 | 10:02 PM
  #45  
FlightDirectorOff's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Steerage
Default

Useless (phraes) phrases? How about a useless thread like this one. Gimme a break man! What, are we all just a bunch of walking AIM's here or something? We are (mostly) proffesionals but we don't have to be robots! And it is OK to be friendly once in a while on the radio. Some controllers sure are, and it is their turf.
Reply
Old 02-02-2006 | 06:06 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

XYZ 1234 vacating FL230 for xxxxx.... Vacating? Like a hotel/motel vacancy?
Reply
Old 02-09-2006 | 07:19 AM
  #47  
FuelJetA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Default

My pet peeve is when you pick up a clearance that is like this one...
You are cleared to XYZ as filed, climb and maintain 3,000 expect 5,000 in 10 minutes departure is 126.95 squawk 3371.

Everyone reads this back word for word! It's as filed people!

I say...
Acknowledge clearance, squawk 3371.

They say, read back correct. Done!

It took SO much less time. If they give you the full route they want to hear it. If they give you as filed, they expect that you have it already, so why read it back?

The other thing that irks controllers (I know a few) is when pilots say 'three point five' meaning 3,500. I've heard them ***** about it. Just say thirty-five hundred or three thousand five hundred.

Just my opinion.

Last edited by FuelJetA; 02-09-2006 at 09:55 AM.
Reply
Old 02-09-2006 | 07:21 AM
  #48  
FuelJetA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Saabtrash
XYZ 1234 vacating FL230 for xxxxx.... Vacating? Like a hotel/motel vacancy?
When you are given pilot's discretion for a lower altitude, that call is a recommended call according to the AIM. Vacating is the correct phraseology.
Reply
Old 02-10-2006 | 08:07 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: 767
Default

Originally Posted by FlightDirectorOff
Useless (phraes) phrases? How about a useless thread like this one. Gimme a break man! What, are we all just a bunch of walking AIM's here or something? We are (mostly) proffesionals but we don't have to be robots! And it is OK to be friendly once in a while on the radio. Some controllers sure are, and it is their turf.
Thank You DITTO!! I do think its funny when they say "with you" though...really I couldnt tell!! Ha Ha....however when things get tight (busy) get on ...and get off...I hate waiting for some yahoo to tell his life story!!!! when I need to deviate I need to deviate!!! Christ get a clue!!!
Reply
Old 02-10-2006 | 08:23 AM
  #50  
rheidorn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: CFI/MEI
Default

I agree, I flew a lot in Northern Az. There are so many old school GA pilots who are soooo slow and stupid when it comes to radio calls. The best phrase I like to use because it sound like Im actually flying something cool is the word vacating in stead of leaving or descending an altitude. lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rvr1200
Regional
15
12-18-2015 03:22 AM
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
1062
05-25-2015 04:20 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
10
01-23-2009 09:28 PM
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
35
05-26-2006 12:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices