Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Checklist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2008 | 04:41 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default Checklist

Safety Failure In Madrid Crash Also Found In U.S.

(Undated) -- The pilot error that led to a fatal plane crash last summer in Madrid, Spain is also being repeated in the U.S. That's the conclusion of government data analyzed by "USA Today." The probe found that failure to perform the routine but critical task of setting the wing flaps and slats before flight has happened dozens of times in the U.S. since 2000. Failure to perform the function led to the crash last August in Spain that killed 154 people.
Since 2000, pilots in the U.S. have reported a failure to properly set the wing flaps for takeoff 55 times, according to reports filed with a NASA aviation safety database. The flaps and slats expand the size of the wing, giving a plane more lift. Without the proper flap setting, aircraft face severe danger when trying to take off. Bill Voss, president of the non-profit Flight Safety Foundation calls it a disturbing trend and says, quote, "human errors are being made that take away layers of safety." Although the instances are few compared with the more than ten million airline flights every year, Voss says the potential for fatal crashes means airlines and regulators need to pay closer attention.
Reply
Old 10-23-2008 | 07:39 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,886
Likes: 683
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

I think all 121 aircraft in the us have configuration alerters for that...

Some of the older planes did not, but I think they were all retrofited?
Reply
Old 10-23-2008 | 10:41 AM
  #3  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think all 121 aircraft in the us have configuration alerters for that...

Some of the older planes did not, but I think they were all retrofited?
I'm wondering if in these "instances" that the alerters were probably what allowed the crew to make these reports, so it was probably an intial attempt at T/o, but they were aborted because they got the alerter, fixed the flap/slat/etc. setting and carried on.
Reply
Old 10-23-2008 | 11:30 AM
  #4  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,886
Likes: 683
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
I'm wondering if in these "instances" that the alerters were probably what allowed the crew to make these reports, so it was probably an intial attempt at T/o, but they were aborted because they got the alerter, fixed the flap/slat/etc. setting and carried on.
That's what I was thinking...power levers up, DING DING DING, ABORT, ABORT, ABORT....now the tower will report it as rejected, so YOU have to report it too (and do an ASAP).
Reply
Old 10-23-2008 | 03:03 PM
  #5  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

In the military (USN/USMC at least) - our version of the self-reporting program is called ASAP. One of these "instances" could be the pilot crossing the hold short and then realizing the flaps were not set properly or a wingman pipping up and saying something. If they used the system as designed - they would come back and file the ASAP report; but unlike the story almost leads you to believe - there was no takeoff attempt and no need for an aborted takeoff.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices