Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Zoom Climbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2009, 04:27 PM
  #11  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
On my IOE in the 747-400, I had to do a max-power takeoff (part of the checkout).

I know what you're talking about! I did a ferry flight from SFO to OAK when the -400 MOC was over there. I took off under 400K, no fuel and no pax. That 4 MMF can get going, and with a short flight across the bay I was completely out of my element. I didn't even have time to figure the breaks.

I frequently see 3000 fpm + in the 777 fully loaded climbing through FL300, and that's on profile. Man Boeing builds a good wing.
HSLD is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:36 PM
  #12  
Custom User Title
Thread Starter
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,270
Default

Originally Posted by III Corps View Post
An empty plane used to be an invitation to let it go. No longer. Too many studies have caught the attention of everyone after showing that lots of non-standard stuff goes on with an empty airplane. With FOQA and other FDR monitoring programs, the concepts is "There is never an empty airplane. There is always SOMEONE on board."
I've never heard of FOQA till this thread. Just read up a little on it on the web. I guess its an electronic means of keeping a leash on the cockpit crew? Anything to do with that RJ crash awhile ago where the crew tried to take it too high? The site that I was reading said that there are only a few US airlines that are currently making use of FOQA.

Now, in the past, yes. My old copilot flew with AA and one night they ferried a 767 out of ORD to DFW with only fuel to destination plus reserves. Brake release to FL410 in less than 8 minutes....unrestricted climb. Not bad for a fat dog.

Long time ago when flying the early Lears (23,24,25) we used to ask the pax if they wanted transportation or an airplane ride. If the latter, we would let it go. The real fun was to see how close we could get to destination and pull the throttles to idle and not touch them again for landing and roll out.
Now thats the stuff I'm talking about. There are some pretty amazing videos on youtube of various large transports, mostly airbus demos, as it were, doing some very impressive steep climbouts. Even the A380 gets some action! YouTube - A380 Chile Fidae 2008 radical takeoff
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:09 PM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,290
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer View Post

Im talking more like a fast rotation
This has stalled CRJ's. Don't do it...if you get an asymetric stall, you will rollover, nose in, and die. Three degrees/sec.

Originally Posted by AZFlyer View Post
with a steep climbout, leveling off quickly for a little air time.
Airliners aren't designed for negative G's. You will have all kinds of potential systems malfunctions, which will be hard to explain.

If you fly max allowed profile in an empty airplane, you will still have plenty of legal fun.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:34 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Diesel1030's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A terminal bum
Posts: 421
Default

YouTube - OD08 KDC-10 Low runway flyby & straight up take off

In the -10 she really gets up and goes. At training weights at around 320K or so she leaps like a homesick angel. Routinely have to limit the pitch to 20 degrees..she would keep on going if she was allowed..impressive!
Diesel1030 is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 10:59 AM
  #15  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel1030 View Post
YouTube - OD08 KDC-10 Low runway flyby & straight up take off

In the -10 she really gets up and goes. At training weights at around 320K or so she leaps like a homesick angel. Routinely have to limit the pitch to 20 degrees..she would keep on going if she was allowed..impressive!
That's sweet, nice control on the slow pass and transition!
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:48 AM
  #16  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
What is your definition of "hot dog a little"?

USMCFLYR
A Vienna Sausage

File:Vienna sausage tasty.JPG - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 09:57 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hi!

I have been flying the DC-9 lately. The -9-10s, the small ones, have a pretty good thrust-to-weight ratio when they're light.

We have a card for the TO numbers. It gives us a two-engine rotation pitch target (and a single-engine one, too). So, we rotate to the pitch target, and ensure we don't get too slow. The pitch may be greater than 25 degrees in some cases!

Pretty good rate of climb, but NOWHERE near that of a lightweight KC-135R. That was CRAZY!!! I saw one at an airshow: It did a high-spped pass, and then rotated to 70 degrees nose up, and held that pitch up to 15,000 feet.

cliff
GRB
atpcliff is offline  
Old 01-16-2009, 04:30 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Default

I used to think that the 1900 was a hot rod when empty. We would have many empty legs and always like to break the monotony by performing perfectly legal maneuvers on takeoff (Pitching to the chevrons). With these newfangled jets these days it is hard to hotdog because they perform so well with normal power and maneuvers. As I get older I find myself just pulling the power back after takeoff to keep the ride smooth and climb rate under control. When the X is light, it is a homesick angel but I heard the Lear 60 climbs like a raped ape!
ovrtake92 is offline  
Old 01-16-2009, 06:08 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by ovrtake92 View Post
I used to think that the 1900 was a hot rod when empty. We would have many empty legs and always like to break the monotony by performing perfectly legal maneuvers on takeoff (Pitching to the chevrons). With these newfangled jets these days it is hard to hotdog because they perform so well with normal power and maneuvers. As I get older I find myself just pulling the power back after takeoff to keep the ride smooth and climb rate under control. When the X is light, it is a homesick angel but I heard the Lear 60 climbs like a raped ape!
A friend of mine that flies the X says that he has held 5-6k fpm up through 10k' a few times. A L60 pilot told me that he hit the FL40+ in 14 minutes.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-16-2009, 09:41 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
ZnCrO4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PTC
Posts: 73
Default

Anything Turbine that is light is fun.... take for instance a Hawker MTOW28000, Taking off at somewhere around 16500 .... my best is brake release to 15K 1:47 seconds....
ZnCrO4 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DYNASTY HVY
Foreign
2
08-28-2008 10:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices