Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Zoom Climbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2009, 08:14 PM
  #21  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

I know that the dash 8 when flying empty we can typically rotate to 15 degrees nose up or so at pitch for V2 and maintain around 6 thousand feet per minute or so until close to 10 thousand feet on a nice cool day. It depends on the plane but without any actual hotdogging it does pretty well for a prop.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 01-16-2009, 09:12 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
A friend of mine that flies the X says that he has held 5-6k fpm up through 10k' a few times.
The Dorknob was like that when it was light. The best I saw a on normal climb profile was 6600 fpm till 10k at 18 degrees nu at 250kts. Heavier weights it dogged around 3-4500..

On an empty repo it was usually 25 degrees nu just to keep from exceeding the flap speed. The airplane accelerated way quicker the the CRJ/ERJ does. After about 60 kts on the TO roll the airspeed trend vector would peg.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 01-17-2009, 03:03 PM
  #23  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,731
Default

An empty Lear 24 can make 10k on takeoff before reaching the end of a 5500' strip. FWIW.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 01-17-2009, 03:17 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Default

Maybe from Leadville!
ovrtake92 is offline  
Old 01-17-2009, 11:15 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer View Post
I've never heard of FOQA till this thread. Just read up a little on it on the web. I guess its an electronic means of keeping a leash on the cockpit crew? Anything to do with that RJ crash awhile ago where the crew tried to take it too high? The site that I was reading said that there are only a few US airlines that are currently making use of FOQA.
FOQA has been around for about 15 years. The "Dude, 410" incident didn't have anything to do with it. Most airline unions have LOAs that basically prevent FOQA data from being used to go after pilots. It's primarily a trend monitoring/safety initiative.

I ferried a 145 last winter that was light on fuel and the temp was about -15. At 4000 feet I had to pull the thrust levers back because I was at 20 degrees nose up and about to accelerate right through the barber pole.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 01-19-2009, 09:59 AM
  #26  
Custom User Title
Thread Starter
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,270
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
FOQA has been around for about 15 years. The "Dude, 410" incident didn't have anything to do with it. Most airline unions have LOAs that basically prevent FOQA data from being used to go after pilots. It's primarily a trend monitoring/safety initiative.

I ferried a 145 last winter that was light on fuel and the temp was about -15. At 4000 feet I had to pull the thrust levers back because I was at 20 degrees nose up and about to accelerate right through the barber pole.
Gotcha, thanks for the input on FOQA.

These stories just confirm how amazing it is that a huge hunk of metal can be motivated to move so quickly.
AZFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DYNASTY HVY
Foreign
2
08-28-2008 10:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices