Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
MS Flight Simulator Dead? >

MS Flight Simulator Dead?

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

MS Flight Simulator Dead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2009, 05:58 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

you kidding you need like a super-computer to run fsx smoothly, but I will say I have had every MS Flight SIm every made I have thousands of hours on that thing, hell I used to take off , go to bed, wake up and shoot an approach JFK-FCO usually worked out well
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 06:06 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
you kidding you need like a super-computer to run fsx smoothly, but I will say I have had every MS Flight SIm every made I have thousands of hours on that thing, hell I used to take off , go to bed, wake up and shoot an approach JFK-FCO usually worked out well

You ain't never lied. I have 2 gigs of memory, running Vista and still can't maximize the scenery and all the traffic. I'm considering adding another gig or two so that I can.

Btw, I've thought about doing a flight like that as well; maybe doing JTT to LAX before going to bed and then waking up just in time to start my initial descent into LAX.

Btw, a well known member of APC pm'd me one of his old 4 day trips. I going to fly it........at the LCL time as printed on his schedule!!!!




atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 06:48 AM
  #13  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Real Thing

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
you kidding you need like a super-computer to run fsx smoothly, but I will say I have had every MS Flight SIm every made I have thousands of hours on that thing, hell I used to take off , go to bed, wake up and shoot an approach JFK-FCO usually worked out well
It is too bad that you couldn't sleep through real read eyes. Man I hated them. It was just like fight sim. Dark at night boring and you had to force yourself to stay awake all night.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:43 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
whatthe6789's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: CFI in training
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe View Post
You ain't never lied. I have 2 gigs of memory, running Vista and still can't maximize the scenery and all the traffic. I'm considering adding another gig or two so that I can.

Btw, I've thought about doing a flight like that as well; maybe doing JTT to LAX before going to bed and then waking up just in time to start my initial descent into LAX.

Btw, a well known member of APC pm'd me one of his old 4 day trips. I going to fly it........at the LCL time as printed on his schedule!!!!
atp
Only 2 gigs with Vista? Ouch, I have 3 and wouldn't recommend anything less, in fact I'm thinking about going up to 4, which is the most you can get without going to the 64-bit edition...
whatthe6789 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 05:05 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by whatthe6789 View Post
Only 2 gigs with Vista? Ouch, I have 3 and wouldn't recommend anything less, in fact I'm thinking about going up to 4, which is the most you can get without going to the 64-bit edition...
Ok. I'll upgrade in mid to late Feb. Thx for the tip.


atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 11:05 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe View Post
I currently use MS Flight Sim X.

I have blast with it. As a matter of fact, recently discovered that speed brakes causes the nose to pitch up and in some cases depending upon power setting and flaps, maintains a steady rate of descent.


atp

In addition, I found out that when you're parked at a gate and getting ready for departure by pressing F2 reverses engines and you are able to do powerbacks. It seems to only work well with the 737-800's. Just tried it with an RJ and it's as slow as molasses running uphill during an Artic winter .

I use to watch DC-9's for Eastern Airlines do powerbacks all the time at PBI when I worked the ramp for Delta.



atp

Last edited by atpwannabe; 02-01-2009 at 08:06 PM.
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 10:11 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default App to DCA/ MS Flight Sim X

Just completed a "flight" from CLE-DCA, flying the RJ-7. Landed Rwy 15; N1 was @ 38.7; N2 was 68.7; 30 deg flaps; 40% flt spoiler (speed brake)....... man my heart was in my throat practically. It was intense. I can only imagine what the real thing is like.




atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 03:31 PM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 16
Default

I just got a new computer with 4 Gigs of Ram, and an amazing Graphics Card, about 375 Dollars. The whole computer was about $1700. It runs on High Very Very smooth, and on Ultra High very well, its not as good landing, but its not to choppy, still getting 10-15 FPS. So I usually keep everything on high, then plane on Ultra. It's a great game, but I would recommend 4Gigs for sure, and try to get the best Graphics card you can. Makes a huge difference!
rocketright is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 04:21 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
DALSkyking's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by rocketright View Post
I just got a new computer with 4 Gigs of Ram, and an amazing Graphics Card, about 375 Dollars. The whole computer was about $1700. It runs on High Very Very smooth, and on Ultra High very well, its not as good landing, but its not to choppy, still getting 10-15 FPS. So I usually keep everything on high, then plane on Ultra. It's a great game, but I would recommend 4Gigs for sure, and try to get the best Graphics card you can. Makes a huge difference!

The graphics card isn't the main thing you should look at when buying a new computer for flight simming. It's the processer that makes the big difference. Any AMD dual core will work great. I would stick away from intel mainly because the front side bus isn't as high, and you would be paying a lot more for just the name of the company. Nvidia graphics cards work the best with fsx especially when surrounded by lots of clouds. I would reccommend a graphics card with memory over 512mb built onto it. As for the RAM go for high performance gaming RAM and definatly get 4 gigs of duel channel if your motherboard supports it. O and btw remember to geta high watt power supply that will be able to handle your new graphics card. I have a 600W PSU now, and it's great. Anything above 500W should work with any of the newer cards out there, but remember if you want to do multiple graphics cards together then you'll have to upgrade to 800W and up PSU's.
DALSkyking is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 05:05 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Default

What kind of joysticks are you guys using? I am setting up FS X on a 2.6 gigahertz machine with dual xeon processors 2gigs of RAM (WinXP)and a Gforce vid card with 768 gigs of memory on it. Should run nice.
Zoot Suit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices