Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Small plane crashes in Austin >

Small plane crashes in Austin

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Small plane crashes in Austin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:16 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: electron wrangler
Posts: 372
Default Re: Small plane crashes in Austin

Originally Posted by jungle View Post
Do you not find it ironic that the UN reports on climate say that carbon taxes will have zero effect on climate?
No. I think you're talking about Cap and Trade. Big business is already figuring out ways to game that system.

Taxes have been used with great success in the past to modify behavior. Gore's idea was to replace the income tax all together with a carbon tax.

A fairly distributed tax on everyone's carbon footprint - individuals and business alike. The long view: incentives for conservation and renewable energy. I'm not deluding myself that this will happen but I thought it was a visionary idea.

It is indeed ironic that Gore has positioned himself to make a great deal of money in "carbon markets".
Not at all. Here's a guy who has the courage of his convictions. A man who puts his money where his mouth is. You speak as if his success was assured.

Last edited by N2264J; 03-02-2010 at 06:52 AM.
N2264J is offline  
Old 03-02-2010, 08:46 AM
  #42  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by N2264J View Post
No. I think you're talking about Cap and Trade. Big business is already figuring out ways to game that system.

Taxes have been used with great success in the past to modify behavior. Gore's idea was to replace the income tax all together with a carbon tax.

A fairly distributed tax on everyone's carbon footprint - individuals and business alike. The long view: incentives for conservation and renewable energy. I'm not deluding myself that this will happen but I thought it was a visionary idea.



Not at all. Here's a guy who has the courage of his convictions. A man who puts his money where his mouth is. You speak as if his success was assured.
So where is the cheaper energy you allude to?
I'm sure you are all over modifying the behaviour of others, but you do not understand that you have been taken in by what grifters call a long con.

Spotting a long con may be difficult if your idealism and will to control others overwhelms common sense, that most uncommon of virtues.

Most of us who bear the major brunt of taxation understand quite clearly that it has mostly bought us more debt, much more debt than would be prudent and little else. The free market already provides great incentives for energy conservation and investment in future energy sources, forcing people to purchase inefficient programs at the point of a gun will never alter the available technology.

Victims of long cons often don't report them. It would cause a lot of embarrassment and not reflect well on the victim. People often find it hard to admit that they have been taken in by a confidence game.

Last edited by jungle; 03-02-2010 at 09:06 AM.
jungle is offline  
Old 03-02-2010, 09:19 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Again you miss the point Al is putting my money where his mouth (and wallet) is and he is using the goobermint to do it. Big Al's net worth in 2000 2 million, in 2008 100 million.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 03-02-2010 at 09:55 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-02-2010, 01:40 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Exclamation Unintended consequences?

Originally Posted by N2264J View Post
Taxes have been used with great success in the past to modify behavior. Gore's idea was to replace the income tax all together with a carbon tax.
Wouldn't a carbon tax just percolate down to the consumer as another sales tax, thus eliminating the progressive nature of federal taxation? The rich can afford to "go green" more easily than the middle class. And suppose the "behavioral modification" worked --- the feds would starve themselves of revenue.

A fairly distributed tax on everyone's carbon footprint - individuals and business alike.
Aye, there's the rub. Lobbyists and lawyers would have a field day arguing the proper allocation of "carbon penalty points" for each good and service on the market. Exemptions and exceptions would be handed out to those with the right connections and political clout.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 03-02-2010, 02:09 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

The funny part, he assumes corporations and businesses actually pay taxes instead of just passing the cost on to the customers.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-02-2010, 10:45 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
detpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Trying not to crash
Posts: 1,260
Default

Well... jumping from the first page to the last page sure makes you realize how off topic we are...
detpilot is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 05:27 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: electron wrangler
Posts: 372
Default Re: Small plane crashes in Austin

Originally Posted by detpilot View Post
Well... jumping from the first page to the last page sure makes you realize how off topic we are...
At the moment, this is the most popular thread on the front page.
N2264J is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 09:08 AM
  #48  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by detpilot View Post
Well... jumping from the first page to the last page sure makes you realize how off topic we are...
Quite right, so I will offer a little recap of the things we have learned so far:

1. The pilot of the aircraft was a "sleeper" actuated by a vast right wing terror group intending to take down the government.

2. We are stealing our oil, but at the same time paying too much.

3. Gore has a vision that will save us all if we just allow him to make us pay more for our energy.

4. Letting a Madcow whisper in your ear every day may turn your mind to mush.

Last edited by jungle; 03-03-2010 at 09:19 AM.
jungle is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 04:39 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: electron wrangler
Posts: 372
Default Re: Small plane crashes in Austin

Originally Posted by jungle View Post
So where is the cheaper energy you allude to?
My assertion is that any renewable source of energy that doesn't require a standing army to seize and won't foul the environment is going to be cheaper.
N2264J is offline  
Old 03-05-2010, 06:58 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by N2264J View Post
My assertion is that any renewable source of energy that doesn't require a standing army to seize and won't foul the environment is going to be cheaper.
Unobtanium?

Hey are you guys claiming the Pentagon Shooter for your team? Or is he one of Beck's too?
FDXLAG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
covsting76
Hangar Talk
4
09-30-2009 09:20 PM
jban642
Hangar Talk
1
11-18-2008 05:46 AM
jban642
Hangar Talk
4
08-12-2008 11:40 AM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
43
08-02-2008 06:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices