Whitehouse Delays New Fatigue Rules
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
By ANDY PASZTOR
Reducing pilot fatigue is a top priority for U.S. airline regulators. But new rules are being delayed by disagreements within the Obama administration over whether the anticipated safety improvements would justify the cost to airlines.
When U.S. Federal Aviation Administration chief Randy Babbitt last summer launched a drive to update decades-old rules covering how many hours a day U.S. airline pilots can fly or remain on duty, the agency hoped to release draft regulations by early 2010.
That date later slipped by several months, but Mr. Babbitt and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood continued to say that keeping sleepy pilots away from the controls was essential. With Congress also prodding the FAA to move quickly, they talked about expedited White House review of regulatory changes.
Now, according to industry and government officials, the proposed changes are snagged by a dispute between the FAA and the White House Office of Management and Budget.
Budget officials have informally told the FAA that the proposal's projected cost to airlines wasn't justified by the anticipated safety benefits, according to people familiar with the details. As a result, there could be further delays in agreeing on a package.
The FAA's proposals could cost carriers billions of extra dollars through the next decade. But if the agency scales back the proposal to reduce likely costs, FAA and outside experts fear it would undercut basic safety goals. If that happens, some pilots' unions have threatened to oppose the entire package.
The tussle already has added to the friction between aviation regulators and officials at the budget office. Unless high-level administration officials break the logjam, people familiar with the details said, public release of the proposed rules could be delayed for months.
The FAA continues to push for speedy action. But according to the latest projected timetable released by the Department of Transportation, it could take until fall to issue a draft rule. Fielding public comments could take months longer.
Dispute Holds Up New Rules on Pilot Fatigue - WSJ.com
Reducing pilot fatigue is a top priority for U.S. airline regulators. But new rules are being delayed by disagreements within the Obama administration over whether the anticipated safety improvements would justify the cost to airlines.
When U.S. Federal Aviation Administration chief Randy Babbitt last summer launched a drive to update decades-old rules covering how many hours a day U.S. airline pilots can fly or remain on duty, the agency hoped to release draft regulations by early 2010.
That date later slipped by several months, but Mr. Babbitt and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood continued to say that keeping sleepy pilots away from the controls was essential. With Congress also prodding the FAA to move quickly, they talked about expedited White House review of regulatory changes.
Now, according to industry and government officials, the proposed changes are snagged by a dispute between the FAA and the White House Office of Management and Budget.
Budget officials have informally told the FAA that the proposal's projected cost to airlines wasn't justified by the anticipated safety benefits, according to people familiar with the details. As a result, there could be further delays in agreeing on a package.
The FAA's proposals could cost carriers billions of extra dollars through the next decade. But if the agency scales back the proposal to reduce likely costs, FAA and outside experts fear it would undercut basic safety goals. If that happens, some pilots' unions have threatened to oppose the entire package.
The tussle already has added to the friction between aviation regulators and officials at the budget office. Unless high-level administration officials break the logjam, people familiar with the details said, public release of the proposed rules could be delayed for months.
The FAA continues to push for speedy action. But according to the latest projected timetable released by the Department of Transportation, it could take until fall to issue a draft rule. Fielding public comments could take months longer.
Dispute Holds Up New Rules on Pilot Fatigue - WSJ.com
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: 75/76 CA
Dispute Holds Up New Rules on Pilot Fatigue - WSJ.com
make your voice heard....
Contact the White House | The White House
make your voice heard....
Contact the White House | The White House
#5
Remember folks, $afety (of the almighty dollar) is the number 1 priority to airline management.
They can preach about how safety is their number 1 concern, but we all know its $$ that really concerns them.
They can preach about how safety is their number 1 concern, but we all know its $$ that really concerns them.
#6
Wow.
But new rules are being delayed by disagreements within the Obama administration over whether the anticipated safety improvements would justify the cost to airlines.
I'm just surprised this administration would, given some of the rules like cap-and-trade that could be coming, would factor in the cost to the airlines as a reason not to do new rule changes. Not to mention they're fatigue and safety related.
But new rules are being delayed by disagreements within the Obama administration over whether the anticipated safety improvements would justify the cost to airlines.
I'm just surprised this administration would, given some of the rules like cap-and-trade that could be coming, would factor in the cost to the airlines as a reason not to do new rule changes. Not to mention they're fatigue and safety related.
#8
It's always money. There's a standard value for a human life. I don't know wha the current value is but say it's 2.5 million. If you've got an idea that will cost a billion but only save 10 lives, well, sorry about that. But if you spend a million and save a life, you're up 1.5 so it's reasonable to spend the money.
#9
Dispute Holds Up New Rules on Pilot Fatigue - WSJ.com
make your voice heard....
Contact the White House | The White House
make your voice heard....
Contact the White House | The White House
It's always money. There's a standard value for a human life. I don't know wha the current value is but say it's 2.5 million. If you've got an idea that will cost a billion but only save 10 lives, well, sorry about that. But if you spend a million and save a life, you're up 1.5 so it's reasonable to spend the money.
Safety is a close second to money.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



