Equality
01-28-2013 | 11:50 AM
#43
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
That is because coercion is a requirement for control, no human is going to willingly be controlled in his person or property without proper and just reward for such action.
01-28-2013 | 11:59 AM
#44
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills,swimming pools,movie stars
How was that for Japanese American citizens in 1940's?
Why me? Am I trying to limit your freedom? Why that attitude?
However, if the govt wants to disarm you, for a lesson in reality... try and keep your arms... or your life.
cute.
So again, it is requested you define freedom....
Why me? Am I trying to limit your freedom? Why that attitude?
However, if the govt wants to disarm you, for a lesson in reality... try and keep your arms... or your life.
cute.
So again, it is requested you define freedom....
As far as Americans of any sort being detained in any fashion I am vehemently opposed to it. Again, I direct you to the Constitution, I don't understand why this is rocket science for you.
01-28-2013 | 12:09 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
No challenge at all, when you coerce or constrain the person or property of another-you limit freedom. Most of man's problems can be easily traced to breaking this rule.
That is because coercion is a requirement for control, no human is going to willingly be controlled in his person or property without proper and just reward for such action.
That is because coercion is a requirement for control, no human is going to willingly be controlled in his person or property without proper and just reward for such action.
will coercion be a constant in man? If not, what would a society be like without coercion.....
01-28-2013 | 12:13 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
the US Mil now has the right to detain US citizens indefinetly (sp).... your belief in the Constitution is idealistic but not real...
01-28-2013 | 12:15 PM
#47
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
01-28-2013 | 12:53 PM
#48
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills,swimming pools,movie stars
You're right to vocally belittle our Constitution however is guaranteed by that very same document.
01-28-2013 | 01:43 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
only the govt ensures free speech or cannot not silence it. The govt has no domain on APC... I can say what I choose... in addition you can go into Wal Mart and spew anti corporate rhetoric and be strong armed by security... again, not the govt's domain...
However, recently at the Inauguration, Free Speech zones were set up far away from the parade route so protesters were effectively silence....
You seem to have a pre-conditioned, almost religious understanding of the Constitution.... certainly not a real political application of it...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
272
03-06-2007 12:51 PM
GotheriK
Hangar Talk
0
12-23-2006 03:59 PM
