Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   JetBlue (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/jetblue/)
-   -   No Pilots (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/jetblue/113179-no-pilots.html)

N311JB 05-03-2018 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by P-3Bubba (Post 2584989)
I flew with a guy who said that last summer he bent over backwards to help the operation and customers in need. He had a new comment to this upcoming summer seasons potential implosion,

“Last summer I got burned out. Maxed out extensions and schedule changes. What did I get? Tired and no thanks. I’m done with that. This summer I’m a no extender non helper.”

That’s what’s about to go down in the face I’d a CBA-less summer.

-Bubs

And with 3 pilot deaths in the last couple weeks, just remember health and family come first

queue 05-03-2018 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by jtrain609 (Post 2585483)
Because he's asking pilots to take matters into their own hands, not follow MEC guidance.

The MEC has been clear about what every pilot needs to be doing.

You are wrong. Consider this. Does ALPA file ASAP reports for you or is that the legal function of the certificated airman? If you violate a FAR and you get in trouble, is ALPA's non-existent certificate on the line, or is yours? Remember you work in a profession that has multiple layers of jurisdiction, some legal, some simply company policy (which mean nothing).

ALPA has it's role, as does each individual certificated airman. It's a matter of jurisdiction. MEC guidance is to follow SOP. Using ASAP or the FAA Hotline (the better option) is not just SOP, it's within the law.

-------- edit -----------
That is what bothers me about people being called in for logbook writeups. They were simply following SOP.

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

jtrain609 05-03-2018 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by queue (Post 2585569)
You are wrong. Consider this. Does ALPA file ASAP reports for you or is that the legal function of the certificated airman? If you violate a FAR and you get in trouble, is ALPA's non-existent certificate on the line, or is yours? Remember you work in a profession that has multiple layers of jurisdiction, some legal, some simply company policy (which mean nothing).

ALPA has it's role, as does each individual certificated airman. It's a matter of jurisdiction. MEC guidance is to follow SOP. Using ASAP or the FAA Hotline (the better option) is not just SOP, it's within the law.

-------- edit -----------
That is what bothers me about people being called in for logbook writeups. They were simply following SOP.

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

If you were getting the union e-mails you'd know the MEC says that pilots aren't being disciplined for MX write ups. Anyone who comes on here and says, "Yeah, but it happened to me!" or, "Yeah, but it happened to my buddy" might well be part of the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt campaign that's being run by the company and their legal counsel.

And that's my fundamental problem with you and a few of the other posters who have shown up since the first picket; you materialize out of nowhere, spread disinformation, and contradict the only source union pilots have for their information; the MEC.

And to really make my point, let me quote an MEC communication directly on that issue: "Our focus is clear. There have been no miscommunications; our statements are specific, true, and readily verifiable. Your MEC is the only credible source of information." (Bolded for emphasis)

queue 05-03-2018 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by jtrain609 (Post 2585589)
If you were getting the union e-mails you'd know the MEC says that pilots aren't being disciplined for MX write ups. Anyone who comes on here and says, "Yeah, but it happened to me!" or, "Yeah, but it happened to my buddy" might well be part of the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt campaign that's being run by the company and their legal counsel.

And that's my fundamental problem with you and a few of the other posters who have shown up since the first picket; you materialize out of nowhere, spread disinformation, and contradict the only source union pilots have for their information; the MEC.

And to really make my point, let me quote an MEC communication directly on that issue: "Our focus is clear. There have been no miscommunications; our statements are specific, true, and readily verifiable. Your MEC is the only credible source of information." (Bolded for emphasis)

I don't disagree with you about only trusting what the MEC puts out. So yes, the notion that people being called in are hearsay until each person proves it for themselves. That process of discovery is fine with me, and encouraged.

My concern is that IF people are called in for these events, and IF the motive is maintenance related, THEN I am concerned of the *threat* of intimidation. Safety culture is a function of public opinion affecting each person through intangible psychology.

So, do you have an issue with pilots knowing their legal options (e.g. ASAP, FAA Hotline)?



This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

jtrain609 05-03-2018 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by queue (Post 2585602)
I don't disagree with you about only trusting what the MEC puts out. So yes, the notion that people being called in are hearsay until each person proves it for themselves. That process of discovery is fine with me, and encouraged.

My concern is that IF people are called in for these events, and IF the motive is maintenance related, THEN I am concerned of the *threat* of intimidation. Safety culture is a function of public opinion affecting each person through intangible psychology.

So, do you have an issue with pilots knowing their legal options (e.g. ASAP, FAA Hotline)?



This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

We're God damned airline pilots, of course we know about ASAP. That's like walking into an attorney's office and counseling them on the elements of negligence. But more important than ASAP, pilots are owed union representation during disciplinary hearings. If you were a union pilot, you'd know that.

queue 05-03-2018 12:46 PM


Originally Posted by jtrain609 (Post 2585612)
We're God damned airline pilots, of course we know about ASAP. That's like walking into an attorney's office and counseling them on the elements of negligence. But more important than ASAP, pilots are owed union representation during disciplinary hearings. If you were a union pilot, you'd know that.

Funny how this board censors profanity except for the only unforgivable sin, using the Lord's name in vain. Did something strike one of your pressure points?

How do you know that I'm not a union pilot. I pay a lot of $$$. So Mr. Airline Pilot, when would you use the FAA hotline vs. ASAP? I would love for someone as knowledgeable and qualified as you to educate me on this.



This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

WacoQCF 05-03-2018 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW (Post 2579294)
Unfortunately, this is not true if historical data doesn't show that same pattern of pilots not willing to cover open time.

Atlas did not win a case when this was alleged in a court case for 2017. What they got was an injunction for the Union to stop using a campaign slogan of SHOP and BOOT (Stop Helping Out Purchase - ie Headquarters) and (Block Out On Time). The behavior, especially fatigue, not picking up open time trips, and sick calls was defended by the court.

queue 05-03-2018 02:00 PM


Originally Posted by WacoQCF (Post 2585686)
Atlas did not win a case when this was alleged in a court case for 2017. What they got was an injunction for the Union to stop using a campaign slogan of SHOP and BOOT (Stop Helping Out Purchase - ie Headquarters) and (Block Out On Time). The behavior, especially fatigue, not picking up open time trips, and sick calls was defended by the court.

So, if ALPA says it, it's okay.

If you say it on message boards, you get problems.




This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

PontiusPilot 05-03-2018 02:33 PM


Originally Posted by queue (Post 2585677)
Funny how this board censors profanity except for the only unforgivable sin, using the Lord's name in vain.

Hahaha. Seriously?

rvr1800 05-03-2018 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by queue (Post 2585677)
Funny how this board censors profanity except for the only unforgivable sin, using the Lord's name in vain.

What are your thoughts on the shroud of Turin?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands