JetBlue finally has come to the table
#261
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
I see the low-rent defeatists are already saying Yes to this garbage. I can wait for the final language but key elements are already missing. If we had these key elements, they would be bragging about it. I just hope people start building lists of what is missing so we can all be knowledgeable of it so that when the MEC does their road shows, we can throw the dirty laundry in their face.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#262
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
What does this bait matter if there's no profit sharing? Look at Delta's profit sharing. Again, more false choices from BJ and ALPA.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 323
My understanding.... with a pilot funded, after tax dollar disability plan, the benefits are then tax free. So pay a little now and get a lot more back should you need to use it.
This is something I've appreciated about our STD and LTD and was glad it hadn't been changed.
This is something I've appreciated about our STD and LTD and was glad it hadn't been changed.
#264
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Queue-
I just hope the No voters actually call the MEC and express their displeasure and what needs to be fixed the next time around (if its voted down).
Screaming loudly on a message board feels good, but nothing good comes from it. Engage your elected MEC officers and tell them you aren't happy and why.
EDIT: Ask them why they voted yes.
As I said, I'm likely voting yes, but if this vote fails, the MEC and NC should be recalled.
I just hope the No voters actually call the MEC and express their displeasure and what needs to be fixed the next time around (if its voted down).
Screaming loudly on a message board feels good, but nothing good comes from it. Engage your elected MEC officers and tell them you aren't happy and why.
EDIT: Ask them why they voted yes.
As I said, I'm likely voting yes, but if this vote fails, the MEC and NC should be recalled.
And, I know why they voted yes... because they are either apologists, defeated, begging for table scraps, have never done anything else in life, or already have a semi-good deal that most don't have. Sadly too many people are comparing things to their regional days. How many people are comparing what they are proposing here to their days of flying with UA, AA, DL? If you look at the facts on the table, the deal is already substandard compared to AA, UA, DL, WN, etc.
The MEC/NC will be engaged but it won't do any good unless everyone does it. People need to vote NO. No compromises.
I would love to be proven wrong but history always repeats itself. I'm agreeing with you that the MEC/NC should be recalled if this vote fails. They've had years of second chances, just like BJ. We've paid a fortune in dues to get sub-standard results. This is a business deal for me and I won't accept compromises.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: fifi whisperer
Posts: 1,255
You're wrong... by expressing sentiments here, others get one more data point. Humans use group-think to make decisions when they are not in full possession of the facts. Ever heard of "advertising"? People who are saying No already are giving you good reasons that must not be ignored.
And, I know why they voted yes... because they are either apologists, defeated, begging for table scraps, have never done anything else in life, or already have a semi-good deal that most don't have. Sadly too many people are comparing things to their regional days. How many people are comparing what they are proposing here to their days of flying with UA, AA, DL? If you look at the facts on the table, the deal is already substandard compared to AA, UA, DL, WN, etc.
The MEC/NC will be engaged but it won't do any good unless everyone does it. People need to vote NO. No compromises.
I would love to be proven wrong but history always repeats itself. I'm agreeing with you that the MEC/NC should be recalled if this vote fails. They've had years of second chances, just like BJ. We've paid a fortune in dues to get sub-standard results. This is a business deal for me and I won't accept compromises.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
And, I know why they voted yes... because they are either apologists, defeated, begging for table scraps, have never done anything else in life, or already have a semi-good deal that most don't have. Sadly too many people are comparing things to their regional days. How many people are comparing what they are proposing here to their days of flying with UA, AA, DL? If you look at the facts on the table, the deal is already substandard compared to AA, UA, DL, WN, etc.
The MEC/NC will be engaged but it won't do any good unless everyone does it. People need to vote NO. No compromises.
I would love to be proven wrong but history always repeats itself. I'm agreeing with you that the MEC/NC should be recalled if this vote fails. They've had years of second chances, just like BJ. We've paid a fortune in dues to get sub-standard results. This is a business deal for me and I won't accept compromises.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Of course people use group think to make decisions. I've stated how I'm planning to vote and you are welcome to agree or disagree with me. Many (most) folks here disagree with me, and thats fine. It's likely going to pass 70/30, regardless of "data points" on APC.
If you want to ask why I'm voting yes, than thats fine. I'm happy to answer.
FYI the "No Jetblue express" is a huge clause that no one is talking about. That said, final language is crucial. We are making less than DL, AA etc. I can't disagree with fact. We are making better money than Southwest, with all of our flying done in house. That counts for something. Also, we are ahead of Alaska (as we should be).
Lets all breath in deeply. Have a beer. relax. If you are ****ed and need to talk, call your MEC reps. If not, wait for final language and we can all move forward.
#266
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: fifi whisperer
Posts: 1,255
You're wrong... by expressing sentiments here, others get one more data point. Humans use group-think to make decisions when they are not in full possession of the facts. Ever heard of "advertising"? People who are saying No already are giving you good reasons that must not be ignored.
And, I know why they voted yes... because they are either apologists, defeated, begging for table scraps, have never done anything else in life, or already have a semi-good deal that most don't have. Sadly too many people are comparing things to their regional days. How many people are comparing what they are proposing here to their days of flying with UA, AA, DL? If you look at the facts on the table, the deal is already substandard compared to AA, UA, DL, WN, etc.
The MEC/NC will be engaged but it won't do any good unless everyone does it. People need to vote NO. No compromises.
I would love to be proven wrong but history always repeats itself. I'm agreeing with you that the MEC/NC should be recalled if this vote fails. They've had years of second chances, just like BJ. We've paid a fortune in dues to get sub-standard results. This is a business deal for me and I won't accept compromises.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
And, I know why they voted yes... because they are either apologists, defeated, begging for table scraps, have never done anything else in life, or already have a semi-good deal that most don't have. Sadly too many people are comparing things to their regional days. How many people are comparing what they are proposing here to their days of flying with UA, AA, DL? If you look at the facts on the table, the deal is already substandard compared to AA, UA, DL, WN, etc.
The MEC/NC will be engaged but it won't do any good unless everyone does it. People need to vote NO. No compromises.
I would love to be proven wrong but history always repeats itself. I'm agreeing with you that the MEC/NC should be recalled if this vote fails. They've had years of second chances, just like BJ. We've paid a fortune in dues to get sub-standard results. This is a business deal for me and I won't accept compromises.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...hwest_airlines
#267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 252
There needs to other stuff in here. No 321 over ride. What’s the company to going to entire fleet of 321s? I need to see an auto bump of 2% after the TA expires. Sorry but this is the contract we should have had already. The company has had this in their back pocket for 3 years now.
#268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: fifi whisperer
Posts: 1,255
There needs to other stuff in here. No 321 over ride. What’s the company to going to entire fleet of 321s? I need to see an auto bump of 2% after the TA expires. Sorry but this is the contract we should have had already. The company has had this in their back pocket for 3 years now.
Final language matters!
#269
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
FYI the "No Jetblue express" is a huge clause that no one is talking about. That said, final language is crucial. We are making less than DL, AA etc. I can't disagree with fact. We are making better money than Southwest, with all of our flying done in house. That counts for something. Also, we are ahead of Alaska (as we should be).
Lets all breath in deeply. Have a beer. relax. If you are ****ed and need to talk, call your MEC reps. If not, wait for final language and we can all move forward.
Lets all breath in deeply. Have a beer. relax. If you are ****ed and need to talk, call your MEC reps. If not, wait for final language and we can all move forward.
Rather than ask you why "yes" (because it's always easy to be a pitchman), tell me why not vote No and fight for something better? Why give up so easily?
This contract is already obsolete from bullet points alone, and in 1 yr when DL/UA negotiate again, we'll be really obsolete and back to the back of the line for many, many years to come. Then again BJ will use timeline to their tactical advantage. We will be at the back of the line forever because they know they can save tons of $$$ for themselves by filibustering negotiations for years, thusly depriving us. So tell me, why not hold out, say "NO", and work for something better?
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#270
On Reserve
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 17
Pay/Scope is on par with southwest (slightly better on pay)
https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...hwest_airlines
https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...hwest_airlines
Our AIP out the water. How about their 6.5 hour min day pay? Productive trips and profit sharing? We get our garbage 5 hour average duty day
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post