![]() |
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
(Post 2863021)
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2863022)
Is that 188 320 ***CAPTAIN*** vacancies?
|
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
(Post 2863026)
Yeah, that’s what I counted....for the whole year.
|
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
(Post 2863021)
188 320 vacancies is what I counted, didn’t factor in the negative vacancies on the 190, but that seat is obviously overstaffed *extreme sarcasm*
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots. |
Originally Posted by SmitteyB
(Post 2863044)
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots. |
The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:
1) These folks have no idea how to plan 2) There will be several supplementals next year Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me. |
Originally Posted by SmitteyB
(Post 2863044)
Notice the fact that BOS 190 CA active pilots don’t change after the reduction. For instance they are forecasting -21 for 3 straight bid awards, but don’t change the Active pilots on subsequent bids. They probably overlooked that because it makes no sense.
They certainly can’t afford to reduce BOS 190 CA by 63 pilots. Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out... |
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2863091)
The only thing I know for certain after viewing all the numbers in a spreadsheet is:
1) These folks have no idea how to plan 2) There will be several supplementals next year Gibberish is what the numbers indicate to me. You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF? |
Originally Posted by RedOverWhite
(Post 2863098)
That's a good point, I didn't even compare the vacancy number to the total for 190 CA, I guess I just assumed -21 (BOS) was what they were overstaffed by for the year, and it was a merely a placeholder until they need to backfill via supplementals.
Seems like it's all kind of a WAG anyway, should be entertaining to see play out... |
Originally Posted by Softpayman
(Post 2863119)
You have it right there (#2). There will be supplemental bids.
You wrote it yourself yet you don't understand? WTF? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands