![]() |
Fly an E190 & want to work for JB founder?
Interesting twist about JB’s founder’s new start up - will start early with ex-Azul E190s. 60 A220s still on order too. Not many details yet from Neeleman. Here’s the article:
https://theaircurrent.com/airlines/neeleman-plans-jump-on-moxy-with-outgoing-azul-e-jets/ Again, not many details yet... |
There’s a little more here:
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...2-brazils-azul And here: https://www.latimes.com/business/sto...ts-new-airline |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2886314)
There’s a little more here:
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...2-brazils-azul And here: https://www.latimes.com/business/sto...ts-new-airline |
Now that’s a golden opportunity for the guys on this forum that are very unhappy with B6.
|
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2886351)
Now that’s a golden opportunity for the guys on this forum that are very unhappy with B6.
"Don't expect peer compensation or QOL, just leave". |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2886505)
You're perfect for your new employer.
"Don't expect peer compensation or QOL, just leave". My post was actually sarcastic. All the guys complaining on here will never leave. I understand their plight but posting on these boards is not the most effective means of getting things done. Trust me, I want Delta level profit sharing too. |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2886555)
My post was actually sarcastic. All the guys complaining on here will never leave. I understand their plight but posting on these boards is not the most effective means of getting things done.
Trust me, I want Delta level profit sharing too. Vertical learning curve. Some seem to have a curve-shaped like Kansas ... flat. I.E. they never or refuse to learn because of position within the organization (project pilot, etc) or are a slow learner because that is how we were brought up. To act with character, values, and integrity. I support that but just not in a business that is a one-way street. The pilot group needs to have an Empire State Building curve. Vertical. Otherwise, the cycle of learning is continual and we will never get there as a group. We have 19-year pilots who ignore the facts, we have 10-year pilots who are still hopeful and then we have new hires. We are not on the same page. How do we get there? Experience. Kansas or Empire State Building! The company has time on their side and by the time the cycle is run its course and all iterations are exhausted ... all of us will be retired. All of us. Drop all your allusions. You are cost unit and nothing more. Act like one and FAST!. Learning complete. |
French Carrier Aigle Azur Files for Bankruptcy
September 4, 2019 Jose Antonio Payet News French carrier Aigle Azur has filed for bankruptcy following some turbulent months of financial difficulties and problems at the corporate level. Other shareholders include David Neeleman with 32 percent , as reported by FlightGlobal. ---- Getting my app ready. |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2886555)
My post was actually sarcastic. All the guys complaining on here will never leave. I understand their plight but posting on these boards is not the most effective means of getting things done.
Trust me, I want Delta level profit sharing too. In addition to BluejetDork's post about education, I would add that the best place to educate the "specials" is the place where the "specials" hang out. APC. |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2886555)
Trust me, I want Delta level profit sharing too.
The profitability of the company or size relative to Delta or is it something else? "Edumated" us! |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2886351)
Now that’s a golden opportunity for the guys on this forum that are very unhappy with B6.
|
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
(Post 2886895)
Why the incremental difference?
The profitability of the company or size relative to Delta or is it something else? "Edumated" us!
Originally Posted by localizer
... Crickets ...
|
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
(Post 2888112)
Again, why the incremental difference between DAL and B6?
What are you asking me? Why does Delta get paid more? Perhaps their company has been around much longer and is much bigger and more profitable? |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2888144)
What are you asking me? Why does Delta get paid more?
Perhaps their company has been around much longer and is much bigger and more profitable? |
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2888144)
What are you asking me? Why does Delta get paid more?
Perhaps their company has been around much longer and is much bigger and more profitable? You’re new so you get a pass...but don’t buy that line for a second. Jetblue can absolutely afford to pay us in line with our legacy/SWA peers. Pilot pay has never bankrupted a company, despite management wanting you to believe it has or will. Nor will it limit growth opportunities. Keep in mind, jetblue recently bought back what, $1.5 billion in stock? If jetblue couldn’t afford to pay us industry leading pay, they also couldn’t afford to buy back that much stock. Nor could they afford to buy the majority of its A321s with cash. |
The reason is simple.
Management keeps changing the formula. Up until 2006, the formula was simple. 15% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit sharing percentage. Basically the standard formula across airlines and other industries. Then the monkey business started. It changed to: 15% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit-sharing percentage - 500 basis points (5% cliff). Then it changed again: 10% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit-sharing percentage - 500 basis points (5% cliff). That is what turned what should have been 8.7% into 0.02%. Not the size of DAL compared to BlueJet or the age difference. Greed and then blame-shifting that the gullible swallow hook line and sinker. But we have some newbie pointing to the size of DAL as the reason. Talk about mouth wide open and ready for the juice. Learn your history before dropping your: "if you don't like it leave" BS. It's old and the company is not waiting for the pilot group to smarten up. They have time to wait!!! Why pilots continually work against themselves and trust those how are not in their ranks is extremely strange. They must screen for that trait. Drop it! |
It's not 0.02%.
|
Originally Posted by 360KIAS
(Post 2888215)
It's not 0.02%.
Or 0.02. Take your pick Should have been 8.7% |
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
(Post 2888233)
0.2%
Or 0.02. Take your pick Should have been 8.7% If things are so bad here why don't you just leave, and let us be happy and content with the scraps we get? :rolleyes: |
0.002, 0.02 or 0.2% all looks the same on an iPhone screen.
In our paycheck, the 8.5% we lost is very noticeable. But only if we had DAL size or age we could have a real profit-sharing plan. If only. [/sarcasm] Targeted selection at its finest! |
Neelemans magic isn't gonna work this time around. Today's environment favors pilots and good contracts. He's gonna have a hard time finding pilots who are willing to work for peanuts. If he does find those suckers they'er gonna quickly find out they are grossly underpaid in comparison to their peers. And that will be where Neeleman will hit a brick wall. He has never dealt with that reality. Times have changed it is no longer 2001.
|
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
(Post 2888233)
0.2%
Or 0.02. Take your pick Should have been 8.7% |
For instance?
10X really? Is that significant in your spectrum world. To those who are not (my son is, BTW) it doesn't matter since what we are really talking about is the left side of the decimal point. Not the right side. Those who try to avoid real issue ... distract. That is all that you did. Next time start with: "Yep you are correct but btw it should be 0.2%, not 0.02%." You are correct. I was typing and deciding at the same time to either post 0.002 or the % and conflated the two into 0.02%. Later. |
James and BluejetDork nailed it.
|
Originally Posted by CafeConLeche
(Post 2888323)
Neelemans magic isn't gonna work this time around. Today's environment favors pilots and good contracts. He's gonna have a hard time finding pilots who are willing to work for peanuts. If he does find those suckers they'er gonna quickly find out they are grossly underpaid in comparison to their peers. And that will be where Neeleman will hit a brick wall. He has never dealt with that reality. Times have changed it is no longer 2001.
He’ll have no problem unless he grossly under compensates them. |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2888796)
He’ll have no problem unless he grossly under compensates them. |
Originally Posted by CafeConLeche
(Post 2888323)
Neelemans magic isn't gonna work this time around. Today's environment favors pilots and good contracts. He's gonna have a hard time finding pilots who are willing to work for peanuts. If he does find those suckers they'er gonna quickly find out they are grossly underpaid in comparison to their peers. And that will be where Neeleman will hit a brick wall. He has never dealt with that reality. Times have changed it is no longer 2001.
|
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 2888929)
Maybe he’s banking on a large recession type event.
They are really banking on a recession. |
Originally Posted by BlueJetDork
(Post 2888204)
The reason is simple.
Management keeps changing the formula. Up until 2006, the formula was simple. 15% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit sharing percentage. Basically the standard formula across airlines and other industries. Then the monkey business started. It changed to: 15% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit-sharing percentage - 500 basis points (5% cliff). Then it changed again: 10% of pre-tax profit divided by company-wide eligible earnings = profit-sharing percentage - 500 basis points (5% cliff). That is what turned what should have been 8.7% into 0.02%. Not the size of DAL compared to BlueJet or the age difference. Greed and then blame-shifting that the gullible swallow hook line and sinker. But we have some newbie pointing to the size of DAL as the reason. Talk about mouth wide open and ready for the juice. Learn your history before dropping your: "if you don't like it leave" BS. It's old and the company is not waiting for the pilot group to smarten up. They have time to wait!!! Why pilots continually work against themselves and trust those how are not in their ranks is extremely strange. They must screen for that trait. Drop it! Where did I say “if you don’t like it leave?” I simply said that Moxy is an opportunity for JB drivers to leave if they are unhappy. I’ll admit it was sarcastic but dude...relax. I’m not over here gobbling up blue juice. |
Originally Posted by CafeConLeche
(Post 2888323)
Neelemans magic isn't gonna work this time around. Today's environment favors pilots and good contracts. He's gonna have a hard time finding pilots who are willing to work for peanuts. If he does find those suckers they'er gonna quickly find out they are grossly underpaid in comparison to their peers. And that will be where Neeleman will hit a brick wall. He has never dealt with that reality. Times have changed it is no longer 2001.
|
Originally Posted by localizer
(Post 2888933)
Where did I say “if you don’t like it leave?”
I simply said that Moxy is an opportunity for JB drivers to leave if they are unhappy. I’ll admit it was sarcastic but dude...relax. I’m not over here gobbling up blue juice. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2889057)
You realize tens of thousands of qualified pilots making peanuts at the regionals right? They all have ATP's and type ratings, just like you.
I predict in the next year or two, as the first of the repeated tsunami waves come crashing, the big 6 will be hiring half of the (non-lifer) regional captains every year, repeatedly. Read that again. Let it soak in. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 2889104)
If you add them up, there are 20,000 pilots working at the regionals.
I predict in the next year or two, as the first of the repeated tsunami waves come crashing, the big 6 will be hiring half of the (non-lifer) regional captains every year, repeatedly. Read that again. Let it soak in. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2889057)
You realize tens of thousands of qualified pilots making peanuts at the regionals right? They all have ATP's and type ratings, just like you.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2889133)
You don't think they would rather go to one of the many high paying airlines?
It's harder to get hired at delta than admitted to Harvard. What do you not understand about that? |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 2889104)
If you add them up, there are 20,000 pilots working at the regionals.
I predict in the next year or two, as the first of the repeated tsunami waves come crashing, the big 6 will be hiring half of the (non-lifer) regional captains every year, repeatedly. Read that again. Let it soak in. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2889252)
You don't think they haven't had their apps in for years or decades at those high paying airlines?
It's harder to get hired at delta than admitted to Harvard. What do you not understand about that? |
Originally Posted by full of luv
(Post 2889256)
At least at Harvard you could pay some money, fake a waterpolo pedigree and/or make a substantial donation to tip the scales....
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2889253)
I doubt it. My old flight school in AZ trains 900 pilots a year. One single flight school.
https://www.faa.gov/data_research/av...men-stats.xlsx 2017 and 2018 are the first years that we have seen an increase in pilot training after 14 continuous years of decreases. https://www.faa.gov/data_research/av...men-stats.xlsx We have dug a hole we’ll be 5-10 years getting out of. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2889252)
You don't think they haven't had their apps in for years or decades at those high paying airlines?
It's harder to get hired at delta than admitted to Harvard. What do you not understand about that? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands