![]() |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3603110)
Our contract does not allow for that
Hey, at least we'll get 2%. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3603110)
Our contract does not allow for that
|
As long as they are gonna pay us for it and the planes are brought onto our certificate and never allowed to move the other way.
swa/at style. That’s how they did it. im just saying right now the contract doesn’t allow it and we better not allow a work around unless the language is very tight. no dual ops without a plan to bring it all under one roof. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3603152)
As long as they are gonna pay us for it and the planes are brought onto our certificate and never allowed to move the other way.
swa/at style. That’s how they did it. im just saying right now the contract doesn’t allow it and we better not allow a work around unless the language is very tight. no dual ops without a plan to bring it all under one roof. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3603152)
As long as they are gonna pay us for it and the planes are brought onto our certificate and never allowed to move the other way.
swa/at style. That’s how they did it. im just saying right now the contract doesn’t allow it and we better not allow a work around unless the language is very tight. no dual ops without a plan to bring it all under one roof. Company: “We are going to do it anyway.” ALPA: ok, but only for a 2% raise (for a loss to inflation). *sell job sell job sell job because FEAR!!!* ALPA will fold for a crappy LOA because there will be fear of the arbitrator, or fear of force majeure, or some other reason B6ALPA will spew to justify folding like the wet noodle they are, but they will be sure to get them next time. They have as much spine as a jellyfish. |
^^^^^…..gets it
|
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3603134)
When has that ever stopped them? Guarantee you the check is already written to the MEC to fix that little inconvenience. CK will be selling us that flica waiting room and a .01 per diem raise to make that happen.
As long as they promise a Task Farce to look into Profit Sharing….. oh wait. |
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3603175)
CBA 1.0: clearly doesn’t allow focus city to focus city and focus city to international codeshare/JV.
Company: “We are going to do it anyway.” ALPA: ok, but only for a 2% raise (for a loss to inflation). *sell job sell job sell job because FEAR!!!* ALPA will fold for a crappy LOA because there will be fear of the arbitrator, or fear of force majeure, or some other reason B6ALPA will spew to justify folding like the wet noodle they are, but they will be sure to get them next time. They have as much spine as a jellyfish. |
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3603126)
I’m sure that it could be arranged… for a price
Oh good grief our guys would probably just ask for a cut above shirts and it’s a deal |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3603152)
As long as they are gonna pay us for it and the planes are brought onto our certificate and never allowed to move the other way.
swa/at style. That’s how they did it. im just saying right now the contract doesn’t allow it and we better not allow a work around unless the language is very tight. no dual ops without a plan to bring it all under one roof. Ahhh Frank Lorenzo returns. Man if anyone even thinks that dual ops would be ok they need to be shown a history book. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands