Search
Notices

115 A320/ 100 E190

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2005, 02:41 PM
  #1  
jblumindtrick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 115 A320/ 100 E190

Initial thread secured.

Last edited by jblumindtrick; 05-02-2005 at 12:04 PM. Reason: Job Security
 
Old 04-26-2005, 05:45 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 157
Default

Originally Posted by jblumindtrick
The last f10-k says we have 115 A320s and 100 E190s on order up to 2012.

I thought we had upwards of around 200 A320s (with options). Can anyone find past(3-4 years) documentation/plans of what our A320 plans used to be?

It might be my imagination, but it appears that we might already be morphing into a true E190 carrier.

Just curious because THE BUZZ is all about the excitement and expansion of the E190.

4 A320 upgrades a month
Captains flying as FO
Any thoughts......
I use to have the specific numbers, but I can't find them right now. But as I remember it was approx 200 Airbus and 100 emb190s, with options for up to another 100 airbus' The total was to have up to 410 aircraft by the end of 2012 assuming we exercised all options.

As for the 190 roll out. I am extremely disappointed about it. It is my understanding that it will initially only be used to current JB cities to add frequency and to keep it close to JFK and BOS for mx issues. It may be prudent, but it is just crap. The 190 has been sold to us and the public that it will open up lost of new cities and markets, yet for the first year we won't do that. I'd call that false advertising.

Well at least the latest upgrades are 8. It is just an example of poor planning, which by the way comes from above. We try to tell them, but they don't listen to us dumb pilots (even thought most of us have one or more college degrees). Plus we are smart enought to know that getting hit by a baseaball bat hurts. So we try to not let it happen. Not Operations and Crew Services (all though crew services is only playing with what they were given, they are inefficient and don't think ahead, and like to abuse all of us and especially the reserves)

But still look at the reserves, or lack there of. It still means that there are insufficient pilots to support the actual flying we are trying to do. (the CNX of flight early in April due to no crew even though the company call it "weather", no reserves on the weekends). Its all bull. Dave Barger said the magic "I'm Sorry" last summer when there were insufficient reserves and said it would never happen again. Well, now it is not even summer and we already don't have enought reserves. Hanging on to the trailing edge of the wing is no way to run the show, and that is what we are doing right now. Every time there is IROP we go right to the edge and now have started to fall. Hang on.....

On a side note, I am glad to see Crew Services looking for vollenteers to help fill reserve shortages with dedicated lines. I'd like to know where the idea came from (QSO?). If it is working then great, but if it is not, then they should up the credit to 6+ ours per day to really draw in the vollenteers.


Just my opinion....


FNG
FNG320 is offline  
Old 04-27-2005, 03:13 AM
  #3  
Lennon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is what I had saved from a post on flightinfo:

2004: A320 - 69
2005: A320 - 84, E190 - 7
2006: A320 - 101, E190 - 25
2007: A320 - 118, E190 - 43
2008: A320 - 135, E190 - 61
2009: A320 - 153, E190 - 79
2010: A320 - 171, E190 - 97
2011: A320 - 183, E190 - 100

There are no firm orders past 2011

FWIW
 
Old 04-27-2005, 07:07 AM
  #4  
kinetic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello to all of you conspiracy theorists.
Originally Posted by jblumindtrick
FNG,

Are we at the end of the A320 lifespan at 115? That is in addition to.

Why is Live TV "rebranded" and separated from JetBlue? Read yesterdays Bluenote
"JetBlue stink" Thats nice.
Does Live TV pad our CASM/RASM? No
What is our return on investment for our acquisition of Live TV? Why don't we ever discuss the earnings of Live TV since IT IS OUR COMPANY? Just curious. It's all in the annual report
.

Last edited by kinetic; 04-27-2005 at 07:26 AM.
 
Old 04-27-2005, 08:37 AM
  #5  
bluerthanyou
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kinnetic
There are over 80 posts on this forum. I hope that you don't consider every one a conspiracy theory. I've never read a forum that doesn't get a little outside the box but this one seems to have some pretty good info.
Maybe you would care to contribute to some of the less controversial threads.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 11:03 AM
  #6  
banger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Emb-190

I heard today that of 25 new hires contacted, 9 chose the 190 over the 320 even knowing they would have to wait and recieve a lower seniority number.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 11:06 AM
  #7  
Lennon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by banger
I heard today that of 25 new hires contacted, 9 chose the 190 over the 320 even knowing they would have to wait and recieve a lower seniority number.

Pretty sad, isn't it?

I had a bid in for it at a very high percentage number. I deleted the bid because I'm afraid I might get what I ask for.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 08:50 PM
  #8  
jblumindtrick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anyone know what the A320 upgrade time for a newhire is these days? I am just curious as to why people are passing up seniority?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bristol
Hangar Talk
1
05-15-2006 11:37 AM
edik
Major
8
03-03-2006 06:59 AM
Av8tor
JetBlue
7
10-03-2005 03:43 AM
jetblue320
JetBlue
30
06-21-2005 09:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices