Originally Posted by uptpilot
(Post 2139335)
Or maybe this is the fact that the airlines are working to further erode the respectability and pay of the profession. Look at how the VA just today announced they are going to be using more Nurses with the ability to write prescriptions. (as if somehow prescriptions were the solution to every ailment) Doctors disagree with this practice but of course, they are not being listened to by management. A terrible VA is just about to get even worse!
|
My opinion
So the resentment is quite understood, from my understanding JB wants the guys to learn the JB way from get go. Training at most schools is 6-7 months, JB training is 15+mos, then mandated 1500 hrs or 24mos at CAE whichever is LONGER, then class date for next available for FO training so about 5 yrs all together, similar to the regional path just about. If you did training at GA flight school, you'll be in regionals by year 3 then 4-5 yrs to major and that's a very optimistic outlook. This program saves you maybe 3-4 yrs half of which is spent on reserve and hot reserve at regional anyways. With most regionals now having flow thru to major without interview str8 class date, JB is simply gearing up to have a guaranteed pilot supply starting late 2021 and there on, 24 cadets per year and the rest hired from pool, 125k is a very hefty price tag but it's an investment in yourself just like you'd take a student loan for any specialized degree. There are pros and cons to every path and different opinions from different perspectives, I guess in 15 yrs the , now new cadets, would be resentful against cadets whose training would be sponsored by the airline and the, now older generation, cadets paid OOP. But I know this, going forward, this will be the way of training pilots, majors paying, bond signed for employment, pilot employed at regional and flow thru to major in 5 yrs or so. Gotta be !!
|
Originally Posted by grim04
(Post 2106719)
Absolutely the worst thing that is happening. Will it be worth it to spend all that money to never touch the controls of an airline? We are still trying to get this abysmal program shut down. Hopefully with our new CBA it will address this in some way. maybe anyone that comes through the program gets put on a B scale pay wise at 15$ an hour. That should shut it down. So if you want to gamble go ahead but we will know who the specials are.
|
Originally Posted by BlueBlood
(Post 2106704)
You doing it wrong. My 1st class + EKG was $60
I think you screwed it up here and try to BS your way out |
Originally Posted by GuppyPuppy
(Post 2114880)
That's a huge ($125,000.00) gamble. What if JB isn't JB in 4 years? What if you don't make it? Do you get any type of refund at any point along the way if you opt out? Will you get any health benefits during your 4 years of training?
Don't expect any respect from your peers for choosing this path. GP This program it isn't for me as 4-years is a huge period of time. But for those that come thru, I feel they should have nothing but the utmost respect. I don't understand for real your and many other peer's point. |
Originally Posted by eryka
(Post 2763680)
I don't understand why a pilot graduated from this program shouldn't be respected. By any mean is an easy way, at all!
This program it isn't for me as 4-years is a huge period of time. But for those that come thru, I feel they should have nothing but the utmost respect. I don't understand for real your and many other peer's point. |
Originally Posted by eryka
(Post 2763680)
I don't understand why a pilot graduated from this program shouldn't be respected. By any mean is an easy way, at all!
This program it isn't for me as 4-years is a huge period of time. But for those that come thru, I feel they should have nothing but the utmost respect. I don't understand for real your and many other peer's point. |
Originally Posted by eryka
(Post 2763680)
I don't understand why a pilot graduated from this program shouldn't be respected. By any mean is an easy way, at all!
This program it isn't for me as 4-years is a huge period of time. But for those that come thru, I feel they should have nothing but the utmost respect. I don't understand for real your and many other peer's point. |
Dude has got to be a troll.
|
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2763716)
Dude has got to be a troll.
|
Originally Posted by speedbird2263
(Post 2763718)
the trolling in the jetblue forums, on various fronts, has been a-grade lately...
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2763760)
i heard we're merging with nasa!!!!!!
|
These ab initio are a way to dilute the pay over time. Airline execs are grabbing every straw possible to pay people less.
So for you, and the rest of us, remind yourself everyday that you spent between 100k to 200k on a 4 year degree and then paid an additional 125k for flight training and that your first jobs in aviation are going to pay in sandwiches. Make sure when you end up at your "dream job" your pay never falls short of rewarding that type of financial commitment. |
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 2107028)
Some good info in this article however, the suggestion that "socioeconomic pressures" of his job helped pushed Lubitz over the edge is ludicrous. He was a sociopath and murderer that never should have been allowed near a cockpit. If you use him as an example of what can happen if our profession continues to deteriorate, then your argument loses all credibility.
|
Originally Posted by Mobiusixi
(Post 2107212)
Also accepted into this program. I am not trolling, what would be the point?
My confusion lies with the, "You didn't spend 10 years at a regional, so you won't have the experience". In my early days when I was trying to get my private pilots licence right out of high school. I worked as a fueler for United's contractor as I knew it was the best way into the cockpit and talk with pilots. I fueled thousands of United express ERJs and others. I always imagined at the time these pilots had years of experience but I was surprised early on to learn most of them were put behind the controls of these planes with 250 hours or a hair above. My point being I suppose, they didn't get replaced with more experienced pilots when the crosswinds we're gusting at 30 knots or when an engine faluire occured. Why can't I, assuming I pass the course, be the SIC on an E190 at 1500 hours? The devaluing of pilots may hold true, but the expirence thing throws me for a loop. Please understand, I'm not at all trying to be a jerk, I'm trying to understand at least this aspect of the aggression towards this program. |
First solo to jetblue took me 20 years.
|
Originally Posted by WeirdBeard
(Post 2764612)
First solo to jetblue took me 20 years.
|
The ab initio program dilutes pilot pay. We are paid commensurate to experience. We are paid based on what we expect we are worth. A 40 year old believes they are worth a lot more than a 23 year old just happy to sit in a shiny jet. There are plenty of 20 year olds who would PAY to sit in that seat. BIG difference.
Folks with decades of experience also understand the importance of unity in a union (well most anyway). Ab initio is just a way to control pilots from when they are the most naive and ignorant. And also, while some pilots got hired into E145's with around 300 hours, it was never "most". FWIW, I interviewed with JetBlue after 17 years from my first solo and was around mid-level age in my interview group. |
Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
(Post 2764625)
Yep 13 years for me.
And I kinda had it easy. Lots worked harder and longer than me and I respect them. They respect me too for the hard road I followed to get here. So you’ll have to pardon those who have no respect for those trying to shortcut the entire system. Too bad if you don’t like it. |
A lot of these XX years to JB have to do with the aviation environment at the time. We are not in the same Environment today that existed 20+ years ago. Yada yada yada, pilot shortage.
The reason these programs exist is because of the airlines need for pilots and the pilots need for training. If just one of these two factors was gone, this program wouldn't exist. According to the JB Profile on APC, the most junior captain was a Feb 2015 hire. Since zero to Regional FO takes about 2-3 years for a motivated pilot, it's conceivable that even pilots NOT using the ab initio program could potentially be hired within 4 years of their solo flight. That said, I'm not a fan of these programs. Pilots can get flight training MUCH cheaper than 110k/125k using FBOs and Flying Clubs. Goodness knows there are plenty of CFIs looking for hours willing to do work cheap on the side. So you're basically paying for the benefit of skipping the regionals and going direct into JB. I won't lie... that's a pretty big benefit. I just can't justify the 70k-80k additional expense for it. Mostly because I loathe debt. |
Originally Posted by JayMahon
(Post 2764740)
A lot of these XX years to JB have to do with the aviation environment at the time. We are not in the same Environment today that existed 20+ years ago. Yada yada yada, pilot shortage.
The reason these programs exist is because of the airlines need for pilots and the pilots need for training. If just one of these two factors was gone, this program wouldn't exist. According to the JB Profile on APC, the most junior captain was a Feb 2015 hire. Since zero to Regional FO takes about 2-3 years for a motivated pilot, it's conceivable that even pilots NOT using the ab initio program could potentially be hired within 4 years of their solo flight. That said, I'm not a fan of these programs. Pilots can get flight training MUCH cheaper than 110k/125k using FBOs and Flying Clubs. Goodness knows there are plenty of CFIs looking for hours willing to do work cheap on the side. So you're basically paying for the benefit of skipping the regionals and going direct into JB. I won't lie... that's a pretty big benefit. I just can't justify the 70k-80k additional expense for it. Mostly because I loathe debt. |
Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
(Post 2764625)
Yep 13 years for me.
|
Originally Posted by leavemealone
(Post 2763891)
Compared to that person, what do you bring to the table?
|
Originally Posted by blue dude
(Post 2765349)
his check cleared?
Gp |
Meh. I don't have much of a problem with this program, mostly because I know that most people, myself included, would have taken advantage of something like this if it existed 16 years ago. I paid $80,000 in the early 2000s for my commercial, CFIs, etc. According to the Google, that's about $110,000 in today's money. Sure, I instructed, then went to a regional and paid my dues for way way way too long, and I finally got here.
If I could have paid like $90,000 (in 2003 money) and gotten on at a company like JetBlue in 2006 or 2007 instead of 2018...do the math, that would have increased my lifetime earnings by a metric #*#* ton of money. I guess my point is, don't fault a guy for taking advantage of programs that exist now that didn't exist when we were brand new. The industry has changed, and they are simply doing what is best for their careers. It's unfair to expect someone to cost themselves seniority and lifetime earnings simply because we had to struggle more, and we feel like they should have to struggle too. Life ain't fair. |
Not interested in flying with a switch monkey. I'd like for the FO to have some there there, as in actually have flown planes in the real world, made good decisions and bad, and be able to offer up options based on some experience other than sim session 24b.
|
Originally Posted by ProPilotBlue
(Post 2766211)
Meh. I don't have much of a problem with this program, mostly because I know that most people, myself included, would have taken advantage of something like this if it existed 16 years ago. I paid $80,000 in the early 2000s for my commercial, CFIs, etc. According to the Google, that's about $110,000 in today's money. Sure, I instructed, then went to a regional and paid my dues for way way way too long, and I finally got here.
If I could have paid like $90,000 (in 2003 money) and gotten on at a company like JetBlue in 2006 or 2007 instead of 2018...do the math, that would have increased my lifetime earnings by a metric #*#* ton of money. I guess my point is, don't fault a guy for taking advantage of programs that exist now that didn't exist when we were brand new. The industry has changed, and they are simply doing what is best for their careers. It's unfair to expect someone to cost themselves seniority and lifetime earnings simply because we had to struggle more, and we feel like they should have to struggle too. Life ain't fair. That being said, I’ve psychologically come to grips with it is what it is. I spent nearly 3000 hrs doing primary flight instruction. I’ve freight dogged single pilot loaded with ice at 3am over Lake Erie. Done the fracs. The regionals. Twice. Congrats to anyone that gets the career boost. I Just don’t expect someone to look left and whine about having to CFI for 300 hours, or bemoan the fact that after two years they’re not an Airbus CA despite the largest thing flown being a Piper Seneca. Attitude is going to be everything in how this is received. If you’re in this program the learning should (will?) continue for years on the line. |
Originally Posted by Std Deviation
(Post 2766226)
It’s human nature to expect people to pay their dues. Many of us came up in the early 90s in which pay for training (yep, you paid your employer), time building schemes (pay to fly right seat in a Navajo on a revenue flight), and training contracts were the norm. I started flying in 89 so the last 30 years have been quite a ride. There’s a great article in the March issue of Professional Pilot Magazine that lays out where we were and where we are now. More aptly entitled, “Show me the Money” if you ask me.
That being said, I’ve psychologically come to grips with it is what it is. I spent nearly 3000 hrs doing primary flight instruction. I’ve freight dogged single pilot loaded with ice at 3am over Lake Erie. Done the fracs. The regionals. Twice. Congrats to anyone that gets the career boost. I Just don’t expect someone to look left and whine about having to CFI for 300 hours, or bemoan the fact that after two years they’re not an Airbus CA despite the largest thing flown being a Piper Seneca. Attitude is going to be everything in how this is received. If you’re in this program the learning should (will?) continue for years on the line. |
Originally Posted by Blue Dude
(Post 2766216)
Not interested in flying with a switch monkey. I'd like for the FO to have some there there, as in actually have flown planes in the real world, made good decisions and bad, and be able to offer up options based on some experience other than sim session 24b.
Originally Posted by ProPilotBlue
(Post 2766263)
No doubt if any whining starts up, it won't be taken well. But it shouldn't be, in my opinion! Don't whine about how hard reserve is when you're at your first airline, earning $90,000 in your first year. Nobody who flew for years on end making under $25,000 a year is going to listen to that for very long.
Two decades ago: flew with boatloads of 185hr TT time guys. All their training was for straight 121 and they ended up flying for a crappy ACMI in semi controlled airspace, with controllers who spoke little English and not many ILS-s. Best part was, none of them ever complained about anything, all were eager to learn, and after a few months, you really didn't have to hold there hand anymore. At NK now, still would take most of those over the grumpy 10 year regional guys that never got the legacy interview. Definitely would take the shortcut if I could, and so would you. |
I'm not interested in being the instructor to bring those guys up to speed in the real world, when there are thousands of guys who already have experience who also want the job. I did that in the regionals, and while that was OK for the time, I have no desire to fill that role again at a major airline. I don't see why this is a controversial opinion.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2766458)
Two decades ago: flew with boatloads of 185hr TT time guys. All their training was for straight 121 and they ended up flying for a crappy ACMI in semi controlled airspace, with controllers who spoke little English and not many ILS-s. Best part was, none of them ever complained about anything, all were eager to learn, and after a few months, you really didn't have to hold there hand anymore.
At NK now, still would take most of those over the grumpy 10 year regional guys that never got the legacy interview. Definitely would take the shortcut if I could, and so would you. |
Originally Posted by Blue Dude
(Post 2766881)
I'm not interested in being the instructor to bring those guys up to speed in the real world, when there are thousands of guys who already have experience who also want the job. I did that in the regionals, and while that was OK for the time, I have no desire to fill that role again at a major airline. I don't see why this is a controversial opinion.
For YEARS I flew with 250 hour guys at the regionals and most of them were enthusiastic and wanted to learn. After the “1500 hour rule” went into effect there was a Huge improvement in the quality of the FO's I was flying with. I actually didn’t think the rule was going to make a difference but it did. I know some people don’t wanna hear this, but hours and experience matter, no matter how much money you threw at the program. I don’t think it should be done at a “major” or even at jetblew. |
OP: Update? Other Gateway Select Pilots?
OP.... Did you go with Gateway Select? If so, how did it go?
Others in the program... How has it been? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands