219%
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
219%
That's the tariff the Trump Administration is slapping on the C-series jet.
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/n...series-imports
Ouch.
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/n...series-imports
Ouch.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
That's the tariff the Trump Administration is slapping on the C-series jet.
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/n...series-imports
Ouch.
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/n...series-imports
Ouch.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
The decision came after Boeing lodged a formal complaint accusing the Canadian manufacturer of dumping. In its petition, Boeing contends that Bombardier sold seventy-five CS100 jets to US carrier Delta Air Lines (DL, Atlanta Hartsfield Jackson) for USD19.6 million per aircraft, far below their USD33.2 million manufacturing cost, and that the C Series could never have existed without subsidies from the governments of Canada, Quebec and the United Kingdom.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,066
If true, that's kinda BS. Selling something under cost just to secure an order (and lets face it, without DL's order the C Series was in trouble) is wrong from a competitive standpoint. I can see why Boeing would would do this. And that's not to say Boeing doesn't make shady deals but this Bombardier deal is just embarrassing.
Or what about Boeing selling heavily EXIM bank subsidized wide-bodies to countries to compete against US airlines.
And there is the fact that the $200M 787 is being sold at a 50% discount in order to justify the line even being open.
Saying the the Bombardier deal is embarrassing is completely ignoring the fact that Boeing is doing far worse to get rid of a technologically advanced aircraft in a market they aren't even competing in. But hey, they'll sell you used E-190s or a 1950s era -700 at a steep discount.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,807
If true, that's kinda BS. Selling something under cost just to secure an order (and lets face it, without DL's order the C Series was in trouble) is wrong from a competitive standpoint. I can see why Boeing would would do this. And that's not to say Boeing doesn't make shady deals but this Bombardier deal is just embarrassing.
How can Boeing prove that it has been harmed financially when it no longer produces an airplane in that seat category?
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 508
219%
I don't have a strong opinion either way about the C-Series. I will say however, that it I find it a little entertaining and somewhat ironic to watch the DL guys squirm about the situation. Screaming about unjust government subsidies of the ME3, but then are totally ok with it when it benefits them in the C-Series order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,066
I don't have a strong opinion either way about the C-Series. I will say however, that it I find it a little entertaining and somewhat ironic to watch the DL guys squirm about the situation. Screaming about unjust government subsidies of the ME3, but then are totally ok with it when it benefits them in the C-Series order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 508
219%
50% of the airplane is built by US companies. And an airplane that size isn't even made by Boeing. What was Delta supposed to do, by antiquated 737s they didn't need or wait another 50 years until Boeing decided to make a new narrowbody type. ME3 and the C-series are apples to oranges.
I hear you man. Like I said, I don't have a strong opinion either way. I absolutely don't blame DL for jumping on an amazing deal. I just can see both sides of the argument a little. I truly feel that Boeing is spending way too much time making enemies riding a petered out wave opposed to innovating. It'll more than likely bite them in the end.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
You mean like Boeing selling the 737 to United at a 73% discount so they wouldn't order the C-series? Boeing gave United a massive discount - Business Insider
Or what about Boeing selling heavily EXIM bank subsidized wide-bodies to countries to compete against US airlines.
And there is the fact that the $200M 787 is being sold at a 50% discount in order to justify the line even being open.
Saying the the Bombardier deal is embarrassing is completely ignoring the fact that Boeing is doing far worse to get rid of a technologically advanced aircraft in a market they aren't even competing in. But hey, they'll sell you used E-190s or a 1950s era -700 at a steep discount.
Or what about Boeing selling heavily EXIM bank subsidized wide-bodies to countries to compete against US airlines.
And there is the fact that the $200M 787 is being sold at a 50% discount in order to justify the line even being open.
Saying the the Bombardier deal is embarrassing is completely ignoring the fact that Boeing is doing far worse to get rid of a technologically advanced aircraft in a market they aren't even competing in. But hey, they'll sell you used E-190s or a 1950s era -700 at a steep discount.
I had a long SEA overnight so I took a Boeing Everett factory tour. Every single 777 I saw being built there was destined to foreign airlines. When was the last time a US airline ordered a 777? And how many? Can you really blame Boeing for wanting to find business overseas? It's their job to sell the planes. And if US airlines won't order them in droves, then Boeing will find airlines that will. Bombardier is just mimicking Boeing, Canadian based company that has the C-Series being pumped out in Northern Ireland with parts built all over the place. But the difference is unlike Boeing, Bombardier couldn't find anyone to buy their planes. So they took a pretty aggressive step and low-balled the planes to Delta for a massive order that would ensure a launch success of the airplane.