Logging by pairing instead of leg by leg?
03-31-2018 | 09:47 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
I'd have to dig out my logbooks. I don't think I've logged anything for the last decade; maybe longer.
Once you've gone to your final airline and don't fly for pleasure, what's the point of a logbook? Serious question.
Once you've gone to your final airline and don't fly for pleasure, what's the point of a logbook? Serious question.
04-01-2018 | 08:17 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
I'm of the same opinion. The only requirement is that you maintain a record showing you're current and qualified. Most airlines I know of do that for pilots anyways.
04-02-2018 | 01:32 AM
#24
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
04-02-2018 | 03:36 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Because I'm old and have enough sources of non-employment income/savings that if my legacy were to close its doors tomorrow, I'd just go into 'early retirement'.
04-02-2018 | 06:52 AM
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Leg by leg typed in manually from flica paper printouts. It’s a pain in the butt. I grab my stack of flica pairings from my nightstand drawer and put them in logbook pro once every couple months. If logbook pro would go to one price for the mobile app it would make it so much easier but I refuse to pay a subscription like some never ending car payment for the rest of my career. It his company so he can do what he wants but an expensive subscription is bush league imo
The only block you have to fill in is instrument time and approaches if it’s not the default visual approach.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
