FAA bill and single pilot ops
#31
It will happen with newer generation planes eventually, but retrofitting current aircraft to be single pilot will likely be cost prohibitive. And since it takes decades for these things to depreciate to the point it becomes worth it, pretty much everyone employed at the moment will be ok.
#32
I understand what you are saying, but I see this as a first step in the path to single pilot airliners. Everyone who is trying to get something done in Washington cries wolf. I get the looking petty argument, and I don't disagree with you, but I still want ALPA to fight this.
#33
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 128
Wow. Can't believe I just read that on this forum.
Take a look at single pilot vs crew cockpit safety statistics . It's a night and day difference. Two pilots are substantially safer than one, no question.
Secondly, you seriously don't think this is a threat to our jobs? The McDonald by my house has touch screens to order from. No cashier at McDonald's anymore. Last time I checked, airliners used to have 3 guys up front. You don't think it's possible to go to one? It is. It will happen. It will be less safe, but it will be cheaper for the airlines. I expect OUR union to fight this. I expect OUR union to slow the 'progress' of destroying our careers.
Take a look at single pilot vs crew cockpit safety statistics . It's a night and day difference. Two pilots are substantially safer than one, no question.
Secondly, you seriously don't think this is a threat to our jobs? The McDonald by my house has touch screens to order from. No cashier at McDonald's anymore. Last time I checked, airliners used to have 3 guys up front. You don't think it's possible to go to one? It is. It will happen. It will be less safe, but it will be cheaper for the airlines. I expect OUR union to fight this. I expect OUR union to slow the 'progress' of destroying our careers.
But in reference to the comments above about ‘50,000 people being taken out of the economy.’ Well, automation affects every human on the planet, including doctors and financial analysts. There is a hedge fund working on an algorithm to automate management. So in a weird way it’s not a worry because by the time this happens, there will be much larger issues to deal with. Remember, accelerating progress...
#35
The technology is much further along than we have been led to beleive. Email your MEC chairmen about their closed door meeting with various government agencies recently. This is real and it is coming quicker than many have anticipated. We need to draw a very definitive line in the sand.
#37
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,349
I share everyone’s thoughts about how this automation will affect the future of aviation. However, is this something we can stop? While we can prevent funding for reasearch this time, eventually automation will affect us more than it already has.
Even arguments about safety only hold up in the short term. There used to be navigators, radio operators, engineers and pilots on the flight deck in years gone by. Similar arguments about safety were made as technology sequentially rendered those stations obsolete, yet, overall airline safety improved.
So perhaps we ought to change our paradigm? What if we add RPA operators to the rolls of ALPA and Teamsters? If we have contract language to add those guys to our seniority lists we ay do more to protect our futures than fighting to stem the tide of development.
Even arguments about safety only hold up in the short term. There used to be navigators, radio operators, engineers and pilots on the flight deck in years gone by. Similar arguments about safety were made as technology sequentially rendered those stations obsolete, yet, overall airline safety improved.
So perhaps we ought to change our paradigm? What if we add RPA operators to the rolls of ALPA and Teamsters? If we have contract language to add those guys to our seniority lists we ay do more to protect our futures than fighting to stem the tide of development.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Under beer over couch after skool
Posts: 316
Whiskey, Sonic et al,
I completely disagree that studying this isn’t a threat. One study, one rule making NPRM period of 6 months and 18-24 months later all FOs at cargo operators are replaced.
This is coming from from the same group that refused TCAS on cargo planes, avoided 117 rest rules, etc. If you think gutting half the UPS, FedEx, Atlas, ATI pilot list isn’t a significant financial motivator, you are grossly underestimating the potential savings for cargo airlines.
This is absolutely a 3-5 year threat for cargo pilots and probably a 10 year threat for pax carriers. If I’m wrong, then we all wasted 5 minutes trying to avoid it. You’ll waste 10 times that in 2 trips to PHL waiting in a jetway driver.
1500 has less to do with this than the general rise in legacy/cargo compensation. Pilot supply to cargo operators (top tier) is not at risk. Maybe Atlas has difficulty but FedEx and UPS, like United, have no supply or shortage problems.
I completely disagree that studying this isn’t a threat. One study, one rule making NPRM period of 6 months and 18-24 months later all FOs at cargo operators are replaced.
This is coming from from the same group that refused TCAS on cargo planes, avoided 117 rest rules, etc. If you think gutting half the UPS, FedEx, Atlas, ATI pilot list isn’t a significant financial motivator, you are grossly underestimating the potential savings for cargo airlines.
This is absolutely a 3-5 year threat for cargo pilots and probably a 10 year threat for pax carriers. If I’m wrong, then we all wasted 5 minutes trying to avoid it. You’ll waste 10 times that in 2 trips to PHL waiting in a jetway driver.
1500 has less to do with this than the general rise in legacy/cargo compensation. Pilot supply to cargo operators (top tier) is not at risk. Maybe Atlas has difficulty but FedEx and UPS, like United, have no supply or shortage problems.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post