Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Regional flow programs-good idea or bad? >

Regional flow programs-good idea or bad?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Regional flow programs-good idea or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2018, 10:18 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
I thought we were talking about mainline training.

If someone is really that big of an idiot, seems like they would have issues with probation at mainline.

I flew with a couple of 30k hour guys at my regional who I wouldn’t trust to dust a lamp shade without starting a house fire somehow.

Those guys are out there, and no matter what experience level, those few never seem to get better.
Those guys are at every company and probably roughly equal distribution from every training back ground. To even imply otherwise is both silly and only serves to muddy the issues.
Fleet Warp is offline  
Old 08-04-2018, 10:30 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Default

I'm amazed at the elitist attitudes many of you have in the pax flying world. Perhaps you should all take a pause and self reflect on your crappy bus driver job, flying a slightly larger regional jet, living the same crappy lifestyle as a regional guy with a few more days off and a bigger paycheck? From where I sit, I have to tell you that your crap also stinks.
Yes, I fly for Kalitta on the 747(save you the time of looking up my post history) and I seriously do not understand where your elitist attitudes come from? Highly selective hiring process? How about you have a strict training program that washes people out left and right instead? Wouldn't that be a more valid way of being selective, rather than who can please the HR clowns?
No Land 3 is offline  
Old 08-04-2018, 10:47 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
I'm amazed at the elitist attitudes many of you have in the pax flying world. Perhaps you should all take a pause and self reflect on your crappy bus driver job, flying a slightly larger regional jet, living the same crappy lifestyle as a regional guy with a few more days off and a bigger paycheck? From where I sit, I have to tell you that your crap also stinks.
Yes, I fly for Kalitta on the 747(save you the time of looking up my post history) and I seriously do not understand where your elitist attitudes come from? Highly selective hiring process? How about you have a strict training program that washes people out left and right instead? Wouldn't that be a more valid way of being selective, rather than who can please the HR clowns?
Might want to re-read your post. You’re coming off very elitist yourself.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 08-04-2018, 11:42 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice View Post
Might want to re-read your post. You’re coming off very elitist yourself.
Damn it, I must be a pilot.
No Land 3 is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 04:14 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One View Post
"Guaranteed job at a major?"

I had a "guaranteed" job at a major when I got hired at Continental Express in 1999. (For $18/hr, not 39, BTW) And we all know what happened there. (I'm not bitter, honest, just providing an example.)

These flow through agreements are nothing more than a carrot on a string. I suppose it's nice to know it's there as an insurance policy of sorts, but don't stop updating your resume elsewhere.
Are you sure you were hired in 1999? Because If you were hired at CalEx in 1999, then you were well outside of the flow through program. That would have been made extremely clear during your calEx interview and was common knowledge of every line pilot.
CALFO is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 05:19 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by Fleet Warp View Post
Those guys are at every company and probably roughly equal distribution from every training back ground. To even imply otherwise is both silly and only serves to muddy the issues.
I’m not so sure.

The two I’m thinking of were real bad, and had loooong histories of doing idiotic stuff in real life. They were both hired at a very early time in the airline. I’m fairly certain neither one would make it through probation (even at any regional) today.

We are talking real idiots. One eventually got fired because he beat up his F.O. Inflight.

And yes. I do believe majors give a little more scrutiny during probation, in general.

Last edited by jcountry; 08-05-2018 at 05:43 AM.
jcountry is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 05:30 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
I’m not so sure.

The two I’m thinking of were real bad, and had loooong histories of doing idiotic stuff in real life. They were both hired at a very early time in the airline. I’m fairly certain neither one would make it through probation (even at any regional) today.

We are talking real idiots. One eventually got fired because he beat up his F.O. Inflight.
hahaha. MH did that. You have to wonder if the fab 5 were always so fabulous...
Fleet Warp is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 05:32 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by Fleet Warp View Post
hahaha. MH did that. You have to wonder if the fab 5 were always so fabulous...
That’s exactly who I’m talking about.

And, God.... What a ****ing retard, on so many levels. Only through the grace of God that he didn’t make a smoking hole somewhere. I remember his dumb ass arguing about how there wasn’t really ice in the clouds. Forget icing criteria, he thought he was smarter than all the engineers. He had this crazy ass theory that ice couldn’t adhere above some TAS, and at certain altitudes. Ice was “fake news” to him anyhow.... “ Never got deiced in the brasilia, because blah and blah and whatever.” Tip of the iceberg with him.

He was crazy as a bedbug. I heard about him breaking up with some chick. They were living together at the time. He took all of her family heirlooms, pics, yearbooks, etc etc and threw them in the basement. Turned on a garden hose, threw it in there and went to work. Destroyed his house to mess up her stuff. What a true idiot! And just as big of a damned fool in the plane.

Can you imagine someone that ****ing stupid making it through probation anywhere? I guess they didn’t have it when he was new.

Last edited by jcountry; 08-05-2018 at 05:49 AM.
jcountry is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 11:19 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 480
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
I'm amazed at the elitist attitudes many of you have in the pax flying world. Perhaps you should all take a pause and self reflect on your crappy bus driver job, flying a slightly larger regional jet, living the same crappy lifestyle as a regional guy with a few more days off and a bigger paycheck? From where I sit, I have to tell you that your crap also stinks.
Yes, I fly for Kalitta on the 747(save you the time of looking up my post history) and I seriously do not understand where your elitist attitudes come from? Highly selective hiring process? How about you have a strict training program that washes people out left and right instead? Wouldn't that be a more valid way of being selective, rather than who can please the HR clowns?
Do you realize the cost of putting everyone through training just to wash them out, versus the cost of just flying them in to interview?
WakeWash is offline  
Old 08-05-2018, 11:24 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

The biggest problem with flow programs is the decline in quality of new hires. Mainline companies have extremely selective standards and hire only top quality candidates. Regionals on the other hand, will take anyone that can fog a mirror and holds a pilot certificate. I actually dread going to work when I see I'm paired up to fly with a new guy because I have no idea what I'm gonna get. Most have been pretty decent, but I've flown with some characters that just ****ing wore me out. I'm by no means a super Sully, but I can wrestle my little RJ around for a few days without setting off a stick shaker or plowing through massive thunderstorm.

A flow may not be bad as long as it has some strict barriers in place such as no one over forty, no more than ten years at a regional, absolutely no training failures or disciplinary issues, etc.
Rahlifer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iFlyRC
Mesa Airlines
6895
10-23-2020 04:15 AM
AirportKid
Flight Schools and Training
70
09-25-2011 06:47 AM
EWRflyr
Major
14
10-10-2010 10:37 AM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
10
01-15-2007 08:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices