Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ICAO/FAA Set to Approve Age 68 Retirement >

ICAO/FAA Set to Approve Age 68 Retirement

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ICAO/FAA Set to Approve Age 68 Retirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2020, 09:43 AM
  #21  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,518
Default

“Kicking the can” in 2007 helped bring the industry to the quote-unquote pilot shortage operators lagging in compensation and QOL are experiencing today.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 10:05 AM
  #22  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,358
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
“Kicking the can” in 2007 helped bring the industry to the quote-unquote pilot shortage operators lagging in compensation and QOL are experiencing today.
I didn't say that it was a good idea, or that it would solve the problem.

I just said they'll do it. It will help with next quarter's earnings report.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 10:10 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Not happening anytime soon (in the US).

But I fully expect that we'll get to 67-68 in the US within ten years or so. I think it will be much harder to go beyond that for 121.

The rationale for age 65 doesn't change too much at age 67, and there will likely be a big political push, especially if airlines struggle to meet demand because of retirements.

Keep in mind that retirement-induced pilot shortages at the big boys probably has more to do with simulator/training capacity than age 65 itself. Creating a new source of ab initio pilots for example may not solve the problem...

If you retire a (typically very senior) guy at age 65 at a multi-fleet airline and replace him with a new guy you generate a LOT of training events across multiple fleets. In addition to sim capacity issues, you just took a bunch of pilots off line for several months. Even with a suitable noob waiting in the wings, you've still probably lost an effective man-year of pilot availability. Keeping the old guy dilutes that problem or at least kicks the can.

The industry will kick the can if they haven't come up with a better solution, and their political cronies will back them up unless there's some good high-profile reason not to.
I think you're right. But if airlines were smart, they'd negotiate a more favorable pilot contract to mitigate their training constraints by throwing money at the problem. Things such as seniority based pay, or more training bypasses, longer seat locks etc.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 10:43 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Unicornpilot View Post
American Airlines' Flight Information Manual, Chapter 18, page 18-42, the new revision created a new section for the scheduling requirements for pilots age 65 and older.

Further reports indicate Delta Air lines will dramatically slow down pilot hiring in 2020 because of the pending increase in the mandatory commercial air transport pilot (CAT) retirement age.
Maybe I don't have the newest version, but I see "Upon reaching age 65, an airman certificate is no longer valid under Part 121"

I also don't see that in the revision highlights section for chapter 18. Was it previously changed?
foumanchu is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 11:51 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TommyDevito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 235
Default

Man, a bucket of chum in the water really started a feeding frenzy...........
TommyDevito is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 01:34 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post

So? What about those who spent an additional 5 yrs in the right seat of the RJ because of age 65?
I was one. Sarcasm much?
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 01:37 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Unicornpilot View Post
Everything I posted is a fact including the ICAO PowerPoint presentations, the reference to the new age limit in American Airlines’ FOM, the new ICAO reg for above age 65 flying, and the New FAA reg, etc.

Yes the medical group contracted in 2017/18 to provide a risk assessment of flying over age 65 recommended to not increase the age limit. However, the regulators and AMEs are moving forward with the age change per the timeline I described from the different PUBLIC sources.

Expect the age change to occur simultaneously around the world in early 2020 with the change attached to a current bill in Congress.
Then how come I haven’t seen one single call to action against this from Alpa?

Secondary barriers but nothing on a retirement age increase. I would think an age increase would be an important issue to members and one that we would collectively be against.

This pilot shortage is overblown. When regionals are paying rj captains $300k and not finding pilots we might have a shortage. Until then it’s just lack of pay. Time to pay up!!!
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 01:58 PM
  #28  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
The slide talks about an increase from age 60 to 65. I see nothing about an increase from 65 to 68.
actually says 60 to 65 for single pilot
and increase for multi pilot
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 02:31 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: NYC FO
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
Then how come I haven’t seen one single call to action against this from Alpa?

Secondary barriers but nothing on a retirement age increase. I would think an age increase would be an important issue to members and one that we would collectively be against.

This pilot shortage is overblown. When regionals are paying rj captains $300k and not finding pilots we might have a shortage. Until then it’s just lack of pay. Time to pay up!!!
This! If ALPA were to be caught this flat-footed on an issue like this - I’d have a host of other questions that would need answers. The fact we haven’t heard a peep makes me skeptical there’s anything to this.
CabbiInbound is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 04:34 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Default

Soooo.... how does all of this square with the rumored single pilot ops within the next decade?
Both an age increase and single pilot ops are future possibilities. However, I suspect that they're mutually exclusive. And I'd expect single pilot ops to win out over an age increase.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/airb...lanes-cto.html

An FAA study got nixed on the last FAA reauthorization bill, but I'd expect it to continue to resurface:
https://www.aircargonews.net/technol...rization-bill/
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brad Mahoney
FedEx
132
03-12-2019 11:16 AM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
Busboy
Cargo
110
09-18-2007 05:41 PM
pdo bump
Cargo
70
05-30-2007 06:01 PM
AAflyer
Major
29
03-16-2007 02:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices