![]() |
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 3432828)
thank you for using fewer
|
The coming recession will drive everyone to use ULCCs and the legacies will go bankrupt, just like last time. Lol NOT.
This time the legacies have better pricing power and they will be able to make their money in places ULCCs can't touch. They'll be able to outcompete the ULCCs in contested markets, which is what they were expected to do last time, before everyone realized that overcapacity combined with 2000 era Orbitz style websites totally disarmed them. ULCCs will be forced into mergers and I expect one Frankenstein of a company will be powerful enough to hold on to some vital markets, but the segment as a whole will shrink. |
Originally Posted by fadec
(Post 3433496)
The coming recession will drive everyone to use ULCCs and the legacies will go bankrupt, just like last time. Lol NOT.
This time the legacies have better pricing power and they will be able to make their money in places ULCCs can't touch. They'll be able to outcompete the ULCCs in contested markets, which is what they were expected to do last time, before everyone realized that overcapacity combined with 2000 era Orbitz style websites totally disarmed them. ULCCs will be forced into mergers and I expect one Frankenstein of a company will be powerful enough to hold on to some vital markets, but the segment as a whole will shrink. What exactly will reverse that because there’s been a few recessions and they continue to take market share. |
Originally Posted by DamnThatWasFast
(Post 3432608)
If you look at the AA retirements. Many are retiring before 65, not many want to stay to 65 never mind 67. Plus, to get to 67 you have to stay healthy. Also a challenge. I wouldn't worry about 67 rule, not likely to happen any ways.
|
Originally Posted by DamnThatWasFast
(Post 3432608)
If you look at the AA retirements. Many are retiring before 65, not many want to stay to 65 never mind 67. Plus, to get to 67 you have to stay healthy. Also a challenge. I wouldn't worry about 67 rule, not likely to happen any ways.
|
Originally Posted by Rhdicjkwso
(Post 3433608)
This train is going one direction and it’s gonna take a lot to put the brakes on. ULCC’s have been taking market share from legacies over the past 20 years.
What exactly will reverse that because there’s been a few recessions and they continue to take market share. |
Originally Posted by Rhdicjkwso
(Post 3433608)
This train is going one direction and it’s gonna take a lot to put the brakes on. ULCC’s have been taking market share from legacies over the past 20 years.
What exactly will reverse that because there’s been a few recessions and they continue to take market share. That’s the point of their existence. |
The legacies have responded and have simply decided to hire away ULCC seniority lists and recruits. And will continue to do so for the better part of a decade.
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3434108)
ULCCs have taken market share from Greyhound, not Legacy carriers.
|
Originally Posted by Rhdicjkwso
(Post 3434191)
An average income family is not going to take Greyhound to Orlando. They will fly. But they’re not going to pay more to fly a legacy carrier.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands