Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AirTran TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2007 | 02:28 PM
  #21  
2Lazy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: A319
Default

come on Ryane946, you cant have that big of Ba**s and only be a CFII? Give us something man?
Reply
Old 06-07-2007 | 03:11 PM
  #22  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
If they are NOT an "RJ", then the jetBlue pilots have no clue either. They are making "RJ" pay flying them.
Not exactly mainline AC either. Even Embraer says so:
"Embraer's family of E-Jets is a new concept in commercial air transport that blurs the line between regional jets and mainline aircraft."
what defines and RJ to you? the distance it flys, because the 145 can fly further than some dc9's. how about size? how big was the dc9-10 that used to be around? why weren't those called regional jets?

I will give it to you that jetBlue pilots have no clue. then again most pilots don't have a clue...
Reply
Old 06-07-2007 | 06:17 PM
  #23  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

They weren't called regional jets, 'cause there was no such beast back then. They were mainline(DC-9,...)! Then Bombardier (sp?). came along with the small 50 seater, called it a "Regional Jet", and the company's jumped on them, screwed with scope, and said "Hey these are "Regional" jets, we won't pay mainline pay... Embraer jumped on board...
Yada, yadda, yadda.
Seemed to have hit a sore spot.
Reply
Old 06-07-2007 | 06:34 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: 737NG Captain
Default

Not to get off the subject here, but if there are any Midwest pilots hanging out on this thread it would be great to hear what they think about the AirTran TA.
Reply
Old 06-07-2007 | 06:36 PM
  #25  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Oppps. Sorry.
Reply
Old 06-09-2007 | 04:35 PM
  #26  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
They weren't called regional jets, 'cause there was no such beast back then. They were mainline(DC-9,...)! Then Bombardier (sp?). came along with the small 50 seater, called it a "Regional Jet", and the company's jumped on them, screwed with scope, and said "Hey these are "Regional" jets, we won't pay mainline pay... Embraer jumped on board...
Yada, yadda, yadda.
Seemed to have hit a sore spot.

not really it just proves again at how stupid pilots are that they would even consider those airplanes "RJ's".

you even know why they called them rj's and yet you want to add larger aircraft to that mix when similar sized airplanes of the past weren't called that. unbelievable...then again not really were talking about pilots here.

so what do you consider rj's?
Reply
Old 06-09-2007 | 06:06 PM
  #27  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
not really it just proves again at how stupid pilots are that they would even consider those airplanes "RJ's".

you even know why they called them rj's and yet you want to add larger aircraft to that mix when similar sized airplanes of the past weren't called that. unbelievable...then again not really were talking about pilots here.

so what do you consider rj's?
Yes, we are stupid, you are right...

RJ's are planes that are to be flown "regional", but they (companies) make them bigger, and more efficient, and pay less...
Again, back to the thread
Reply
Old 06-10-2007 | 02:03 AM
  #28  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
Yes, we are stupid, you are right...

RJ's are planes that are to be flown "regional", but they (companies) make them bigger, and more efficient, and pay less...
Again, back to the thread
got it, so dc9's, 717, 320's and 737's are regional's because they fly "regional".

I hope you don't mean that embraer and bombardier actually have something to do with how much pilots get paid just because they like to give them funny names. if that's the case they might as well start building 400 seaters and call them something like puddle jumpers...

the thread never really drifted. ryan was talking about 86 seat "rj's" in the first post
Reply
Old 06-10-2007 | 08:12 AM
  #29  
G-Dog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 170
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
Yes, we are stupid, you are right...

RJ's are planes that are to be flown "regional", but they (companies) make them bigger, and more efficient, and pay less...
Again, back to the thread
I have to say that Eric is right. I guess SWA is a regional airline. Cause that is their route structure, mostly short hops.

I once heard that a person interviewing at Jet Blue was asked, "why work for us and fly the 190?" The interviewee said, "I would not mind flying the ERJ 190. It would be fun." The interviewer then said, "We do not consider the 190 to be a regional jet, thanks for coming."

Also, Air Canada flies the 190 from Toronto to Ft. Lauderdale. Hardly a regional. And don't give me this crap about X-jet flies to Canada from Houston, cause a 145 does not need to be making those trips. Just cause someone does it does mean they should. Comfort sucks for trips longer than 2 hours. The 170 and 190 are very comfy.

Last edited by G-Dog; 06-10-2007 at 08:15 AM. Reason: more to add
Reply
Old 06-10-2007 | 08:40 AM
  #30  
Sanchez's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: ERJ Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by G-Dog
And don't give me this crap about X-jet flies to Canada from Houston, cause a 145 does not need to be making those trips. Just cause someone does it does mean they should. Comfort sucks for trips longer than 2 hours. The 170 and 190 are very comfy.
Hey easy there Chief, apparently the folks at CAL marketing determined it was a profitable route and that's why it's still going after 4 years. For the record as a passenger I'd take any seat in the 145 before taking a middle seat in a 737.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TRS531
Major
0
05-29-2007 09:48 AM
ToiletDuck
Regional
0
01-11-2007 09:09 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM
Gordon C
Major
0
07-29-2005 01:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices